Literature DB >> 34539129

Factors Associated with Reoperation after Pyrocarbon Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty for the Arthritic Joint: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Bo J W Notermans1, Jonathan Lans1, Ryan P Ponton1, Jesse B Jupiter1, Neal C Chen1.   

Abstract

Introduction  The rate of reoperation after pyrocarbon proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty ranges from 5.9 to 37% and complications such as radiographic loosening, deformity, dislocation, and stiffness are common. Because of the limited amount of knowledge around these problems, we evaluated factors associated with reoperation after pyrocarbon PIP arthroplasty. Materials and Methods  We retrospectively included all adult patients that underwent primary PIP pyrocarbon implant arthroplasty between 2002 and 2016 at one institutional system. A total of 45 patients, with a mean age of 55 (standard deviation: 14), underwent 66 PIP arthroplasties. To address for within individual correlations, we only included fingers treated at patients' initial surgery ( n = 54) in our statistical analysis. These patients were predominantly diagnosed with noninflammatory arthritis 73% ( n = 33). Arthroplasty was performed upon 10 index, 22 middle, 20 ring, and 2 small fingers. Results  The reoperation rate after pyrocarbon PIP arthroplasty was 30% over a median follow-up of 25 months (interquartile range: 8.7-54). Indications for reoperation consisted of subluxation ( n = 6), stiffness ( n = 5), swan-neck deformity ( n = 3), and soft tissue complications ( n = 2). Younger age ( p = 0.025), male sex ( p = 0.017), and noninflammatory arthritis ( p = 0.038) were associated with a higher reoperation rate. Conclusion  In this study, our reoperation rate after pyrocarbon PIP arthroplasty was 30%. This study suggested that younger patients, males, and patients with noninflammatory arthritis are at higher risk of reoperation. We recommend considering these factors when selecting candidates for pyrocarbon arthroplasty. Future studies should focus on prospectively researching these factors in comparison with other implants. Society of Indian Hand & Microsurgeons. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical and Scientific.

Entities:  

Keywords:  finger arthroplasty; proximal interphalangeal arthroplasty; pyrocarbon arthroplasty

Year:  2020        PMID: 34539129      PMCID: PMC8440050          DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Microsurg        ISSN: 0974-3227


  28 in total

1.  Ten years' experience with a pyrocarbon prosthesis replacing the proximal interphalangeal joint. A prospective clinical and radiographic follow-up.

Authors:  M Tägil; M Geijer; A Abramo; P Kopylov
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2013-03-05

2.  Pyrolytic carbon proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: results with minimum two-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  César J Bravo; Marco Rizzo; Kirsten B Hormel; Robert D Beckenbaugh
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Pyrocarbon proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: minimum two-year follow-up.

Authors:  A C Watts; A J Hearnden; I A Trail; M J Hayton; D Nuttall; J K Stanley
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Pyrolytic carbon proximal interphalangeal joint resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Harrison G Tuttle; Peter J Stern
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 5.  Implant Arthroplasty for Proximal Interphalangeal, Metacarpophalangeal, and Trapeziometacarpal Joint Degeneration.

Authors:  Jason J Srnec; Eric R Wagner; Marco Rizzo
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Long-term results of Swanson silicone arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Joshua G Bales; Lindley B Wall; Peter J Stern
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Prosthetic Arthroplasty of Proximal Interphalangeal Joints for Treatment of Osteoarthritis and Posttraumatic Arthritis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Three Ulnar Digits With the Index Finger.

Authors:  Michael T Milone; Christopher S Klifto; Jacques H Hacquebord
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-08-02

8.  Outcomes of proximal interphalangeal joint pyrocarbon implants.

Authors:  Ulrika Wijk; Margareta Wollmark; Philippe Kopylov; Magnus Tägil
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Cemented versus uncemented surface replacement arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint with a mean 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Bruce R Johnstone; Megan Fitzgerald; Katherine R Smith; Lachlan J Currie
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Factors Associated With Reoperation After Silicone Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan Lans; Bo J W Notermans; Lazin Germawi; Hang Lee; Jesse B Jupiter; Neal C Chen
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.