Literature DB >> 34534179

Consensus agreement to rename burning mouth syndrome and improve International Classification of Diseases-11 disease criteria: an international Delphi study.

Milda Chmieliauskaite1, Elisabeth A Stelson2, Joel B Epstein3, Gary D Klasser4, Arwa Farag5, Barbara Carey6, Rui Albuquerque6, Lina Mejia7, Anura Ariyawardana8,9, Cibele Nasri-Heir10, Andrea Sardella11, Charles Carlson12, Craig S Miller13.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) proposes revisions in the nomenclature, disease definition, and diagnostic criteria for "burning mouth syndrome" (BMS). This process could benefit from additional systematically collected expert input. Thus, the purpose of this study was to use the Delphi method to (1) determine whether revision in nomenclature and alternative names for "BMS" are warranted and (2) identify areas of consensus among experts for changes to the disease description and proposed diagnostic criteria of "BMS," as described in the ICD-11 (World Health Organization). From 31 international invited experts, 23 who expressed interest were sent the survey. The study used 4 iterative surveys, each with a response rate of ≥82%. Consensus was predefined as 70% of participants in agreement. Data were summarized using both descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis. Consensus indicated that BMS should not be classified as a syndrome and recommended instead renaming to "burning mouth disorder." Consensus included deletion of 2 diagnostic criteria: (1) emotional distress or functional disability and (2) the number of hours symptoms occur per day. Additional items that reached consensus clarified the disease definition and proposed more separate diagnostic criteria, including a list of local and systemic factors to evaluate as potential secondary causes of oral burning. Experts in this study recommended and came to consensus on select revisions to the proposed ICD-11 BMS nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and disease definition. The revisions recommended have the potential to improve clarity, consistency, and accuracy of diagnosis for this disorder.
Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34534179      PMCID: PMC8449012          DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  37 in total

1.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 2.  Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome.

Authors:  Roddy McMillan; Heli Forssell; John Ag Buchanan; Anne-Marie Glenny; Jo C Weldon; Joanna M Zakrzewska
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-18

3.  Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.292

4.  Effect of a 2% topical chamomile application for treating burning mouth syndrome: a controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Sara Valenzuela; Alvaro Pons-Fuster; Pia López-Jornet
Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.253

5.  Burning mouth syndrome (BMS): controlled open trial of the efficacy of alpha-lipoic acid (thioctic acid) on symptomatology.

Authors:  F Femiano; F Gombos; C Scully; M Busciolano; P De Luca
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.511

Review 6.  Burning mouth syndrome.

Authors:  Satu K Jääskeläinen; Alain Woda
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 6.292

7.  A population-based study of the incidence of burning mouth syndrome.

Authors:  John J Kohorst; Alison J Bruce; Rochelle R Torgerson; Louis A Schenck; Mark D P Davis
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 8.  The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic primary pain.

Authors:  Michael Nicholas; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Winfried Rief; Antonia Barke; Qasim Aziz; Rafael Benoliel; Milton Cohen; Stefan Evers; Maria Adele Giamberardino; Andreas Goebel; Beatrice Korwisi; Serge Perrot; Peter Svensson; Shuu-Jiun Wang; Rolf-Detlef Treede
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 9.  Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11).

Authors:  Rolf-Detlef Treede; Winfried Rief; Antonia Barke; Qasim Aziz; Michael I Bennett; Rafael Benoliel; Milton Cohen; Stefan Evers; Nanna B Finnerup; Michael B First; Maria Adele Giamberardino; Stein Kaasa; Beatrice Korwisi; Eva Kosek; Patricia Lavand'homme; Michael Nicholas; Serge Perrot; Joachim Scholz; Stephan Schug; Blair H Smith; Peter Svensson; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Shuu-Jiun Wang
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  A Delphi study to build consensus on the definition and use of big data in obesity research.

Authors:  Christina Vogel; Stephen Zwolinsky; Claire Griffiths; Matthew Hobbs; Emily Henderson; Emma Wilkins
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 5.095

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reply to Currie et al.

Authors:  Milda Chmieliauskaite; Elisabeth A Stelson; Joel B Epstein; Gary D Klasser; Arwa Farag; Barbara Carey; Rui Albuquerque; Lina Mejia; Anura Ariyawardana; Cibele Nasri-Heir; Andrea Sardella; Charles Carlson; Craig S Miller
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 7.926

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.