Literature DB >> 34533005

Implementation of the new EU IVD regulation - urgent initiatives are needed to avert impending crisis.

Christa Cobbaert1, Ettore D Capoluongo2, Florent J L A Vanstapel3,4, Patrick M M Bossuyt5, Harjit Pal Bhattoa6, Peter Henrik Nissen7, Matthias Orth8,9, Thomas Streichert10, Ian S Young11, Elizabeth Macintyre12, Alan G Fraser13, Michael Neumaier14.   

Abstract

Laboratory medicine in the European Union is at the dawn of a regulatory revolution as it reaches the end of the transition from IVDD 98/79/EC (https://eur-lex.eur-opa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31998L0079&qid=1628781352814) to IVDR 2017/746 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/746. Without amendments and contingency plans, implementation of the IVDR in May 2022 will lead the healthcare sector into uncharted waters due to unpreparedness of the EU regulatory infrastructure. Prospective risk analyses were not made by the European Commission, and if nothing happens it can be anticipated that the consequences will impact all stakeholders of the medical test pipeline, may seriously harm patients and may prevent caregivers from making appropriate clinical decisions due to non-availability of medical tests. Finally, it also may discourage manufacturers and academia from developing specialty tests, thereby hampering innovation in medical diagnostic care. We hereby inform laboratory professionals about the imminent diagnostic collapse using testimonies from representative stakeholders of the diagnostic supply chain and from academia developing innovative in-house tests in domains of unmet clinical needs. Steps taken by the EFLM Task Force on European Regulatory Affairs, under the umbrella of the Biomedical Alliance in Europe, will be highlighted, as well as the search for solutions through dialogue with the European Commission. Although we recognize that the IVDR promotes positive goals such as increased clinical evidence, surveillance, and transparency, we need to ensure that the capabilities of the diagnostic sector are not damaged by infrastructural unpreparedness, while at the same time being forced to submit to a growing bureaucratic and unsupportive structure that will not support its "droit d'exister".
© 2021 Christa Cobbaert et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CE-IVD tests; EU regulatory system for IVDR implementation; European Commission; IVDR 2017/746; competent authorities; expert panel; in-house developed tests; notified bodies

Year:  2021        PMID: 34533005     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  3 in total

Review 1.  Forty Years of Molecular Diagnostics for Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Jonathan E Schmitz; Charles W Stratton; David H Persing; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 11.677

2.  Critical Implications of IVDR for Innovation in Diagnostics: Input From the BioMed Alliance Diagnostics Task Force.

Authors:  Isabel Dombrink; Bart R Lubbers; Loredana Simulescu; Robin Doeswijk; Olga Tkachenko; Elisabeth Dequeker; Alan G Fraser; Jacques J M van Dongen; Christa Cobbaert; Monika Brüggemann; Elizabeth Macintyre
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2022-05-20

3.  Retrospective Evaluation of Various Serological Assays and Multiple Parameters for Optimal Diagnosis of Lyme Neuroborreliosis in a Routine Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Tamara van Gorkom; Willem Voet; Gijs H J van Arkel; Michiel Heron; B J A Hoeve-Bakker; Daan W Notermans; Steven F T Thijsen; Kristin Kremer
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-06-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.