Korhan Buyukturkoglu1, Christopher Vergara2, Valentina Fuentealba2, Ceren Tozlu3, Jacob B Dahan1, Britta E Carroll1, Amy Kuceyeski3, Claire S Riley4, James F Sumowski5, Carlos Guevara Oliva6, Ranganatha Sitaram7, Pamela Guevara2, Victoria M Leavitt1. 1. Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. 2. Electrical Engineering Department, Universidad de Concepción, Santiago, Chile. 3. Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. 5. Corinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA. 6. Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 7. Diagnostic Imaging Department, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aims todetermine the sensitivity of superficial white matter (SWM) integrity as a metric to distinguish early multiple sclerosis (MS) patients from healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity (MD) values from SWM bundles across the cortex and major deep white matter (DWM) tracts were extracted from 29 early MS patients and 31 age- and sex-matched HC. Thickness of 68 cortical regions and resting-state functional-connectivity (RSFC) among them were calculated. The distribution of structural and functional metrics between groups were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Utilizing a machine learning method (adaptive boosting), 6 models were built based on: 1-SWM, 2-DWM, 3-SWM and DWM, 4-cortical thickness, or 5-RSFC measures. In model 6, all features from previous models were incorporated. The models were trained with nested 5-folds cross-validation. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCroc ) values were calculated to evaluate classification performance of each model. Permutation tests were used to compare the AUCroc values. RESULTS: Patients had higher MD in SWM bundles including insula, inferior frontal, orbitofrontal, superior and medial temporal, and pre- and post-central cortices (p < .05). No group differences were found for any other MRI metric. The model incorporating SWM and DWM features provided the best classification (AUCroc = 0.75). The SWM model provided higher AUCroc (0.74), compared to DWM (0.63), cortical thickness (0.67), RSFC (0.63), and all-features (0.68) models (p < .001 for all). CONCLUSION: Our results reveal a non-random pattern of SWM abnormalities at early stages of MS even before pronounced structural and functional alterations emerge.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aims todetermine the sensitivity of superficial white matter (SWM) integrity as a metric to distinguish early multiple sclerosis (MS) patients from healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity (MD) values from SWM bundles across the cortex and major deep white matter (DWM) tracts were extracted from 29 early MS patients and 31 age- and sex-matched HC. Thickness of 68 cortical regions and resting-state functional-connectivity (RSFC) among them were calculated. The distribution of structural and functional metrics between groups were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Utilizing a machine learning method (adaptive boosting), 6 models were built based on: 1-SWM, 2-DWM, 3-SWM and DWM, 4-cortical thickness, or 5-RSFC measures. In model 6, all features from previous models were incorporated. The models were trained with nested 5-folds cross-validation. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCroc ) values were calculated to evaluate classification performance of each model. Permutation tests were used to compare the AUCroc values. RESULTS: Patients had higher MD in SWM bundles including insula, inferior frontal, orbitofrontal, superior and medial temporal, and pre- and post-central cortices (p < .05). No group differences were found for any other MRI metric. The model incorporating SWM and DWM features provided the best classification (AUCroc = 0.75). The SWM model provided higher AUCroc (0.74), compared to DWM (0.63), cortical thickness (0.67), RSFC (0.63), and all-features (0.68) models (p < .001 for all). CONCLUSION: Our results reveal a non-random pattern of SWM abnormalities at early stages of MS even before pronounced structural and functional alterations emerge.
Authors: Victoria M Leavitt; Rachel Brandstadter; Michelle Fabian; Ilana Katz Sand; Sylvia Klineova; Stephen Krieger; Christina Lewis; Fred Lublin; Aaron Miller; Gabrielle Pelle; Korhan Buyukturkoglu; Phillip L De Jager; Peipei Li; Claire S Riley; Angeliki Tsapanou; James F Sumowski Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Arash Nazeri; M Mallar Chakravarty; Tarek K Rajji; Daniel Felsky; David J Rotenberg; Mikko Mason; Li N Xu; Nancy J Lobaugh; Benoit H Mulsant; Aristotle N Voineskos Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Olga Ciccarelli; Frederik Barkhof; Benedetta Bodini; Nicola De Stefano; Xavier Golay; Klaas Nicolay; Daniel Pelletier; Petra J W Pouwels; Seth A Smith; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott; Bruno Stankoff; Tarek Yousry; David H Miller Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-07-06 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Arash Nazeri; M Mallar Chakravarty; Daniel Felsky; Nancy J Lobaugh; Tarek K Rajji; Benoit H Mulsant; Aristotle N Voineskos Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Owen R Phillips; Kristi A Clark; Eileen Luders; Ramin Azhir; Shantanu H Joshi; Roger P Woods; John C Mazziotta; Arthur W Toga; Katherine L Narr Journal: Brain Connect Date: 2013
Authors: Anastasia Yendiki; Patricia Panneck; Priti Srinivasan; Allison Stevens; Lilla Zöllei; Jean Augustinack; Ruopeng Wang; David Salat; Stefan Ehrlich; Tim Behrens; Saad Jbabdi; Randy Gollub; Bruce Fischl Journal: Front Neuroinform Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 4.081
Authors: Owen R Phillips; Shantanu H Joshi; Ferdinando Squitieri; Cristina Sanchez-Castaneda; Katherine Narr; David W Shattuck; Carlo Caltagirone; Umberto Sabatini; Margherita Di Paola Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Fang-Cheng Yeh; Timothy D Verstynen; Yibao Wang; Juan C Fernández-Miranda; Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 3.240