Literature DB >> 34532811

What is the reality in outpatient vs inpatient groin hernia repair? An analysis from the Herniamed Registry.

F Köckerling1, R Lorenz2, W Reinpold3, K Zarras4, J Conze5, A Kuthe6, B Lammers7,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, B Stechemesser8, F Mayer9, R Fortelny10, H Hoffmann11,12, J Kukleta13, D Weyhe14.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Groin hernia repair is performed increasingly more often as an outpatient procedure across the world. However, the rates are extremely different and vary between below 10% and above 90%. The outpatient procedure appears to negatively impact the proportion of laparo-endoscopic repairs. To date, only very few studies have compared inpatient vs outpatient groin hernia repair.
METHODS: All outpatient and inpatient primary elective unilateral groin hernia repairs performed between 2010 and 2019 were identified in the Herniamed Registry and their treatment and outcomes compared.
RESULTS: The 737 participating hospitals/surgeons performed a total of 342,072 primary elective unilateral groin hernia repairs from 2010 to 2019. The proportion of outpatient repairs was 20.2% in 2013 and 14.3% in 2019. Whereas the proportion of laparo-endoscopic repairs among the inpatient cases was 71.9% in 2019, the last year for which data are available, it was only 34.3%.for outpatient repairs. In outpatient groin hernia repairs, the rates of patients aged ≥ 60 years, with ASA score III and IV and risk factors were highly significantly lower. Given this rigorous patient selection for outpatient groin hernia repair, a more favorable perioperative outcome was achieved. At 1-year follow-up there were no significant differences in the pain and recurrence rates.
CONCLUSION: With an appropriate patient selection, outpatient primary elective unilateral groin hernia repair can be performed with acceptable risks and good outcomes. Since to date no studies have compared inpatient vs outpatient groin hernia repair, the impact of a higher rate of outpatient groin hernia repair cannot currently be evaluated.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Inguinal hernia repair; Outcomes; Outpatient

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34532811     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02494-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   2.920


  14 in total

1.  Herniamed: an internet-based registry for outcome research in hernia surgery.

Authors:  B Stechemesser; D A Jacob; C Schug-Paß; F Köckerling
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Life-threatening hemorrhage from the corona mortis after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: Report of a case.

Authors:  Tomohiko Yasuda; Akihisa Matsuda; Masao Miyashita; Satoshi Matsumoto; Nobuyuki Sakurazawa; Youichi Kawano; Kumiko Sekiguchi; Fumihiko Ando; Takeshi Matsutani; Eiji Uchida
Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg       Date:  2017-08-30

3.  [(section sign) 115 b SGB V threatens outpatient treatment for inguinal hernia. Analysis of outcome and economics].

Authors:  D Weyhe; C Winnemöller; A Hellwig; K Meurer; H Plugge; K Kasoly; H Laubenthal; K-H Bauer; W Uhl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Costs and outcomes of inpatient versus outpatient hernia repair.

Authors:  J B Mitchell; B Harrow
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  [Inguinal hernia repair in TAPP technique in a day-case surgery setting - at what price?]

Authors:  U Wirth; M-L Saller; T von Ahnen; F Köckerling; H M Schardey; S Schopf
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  What is the reality in outpatient vs inpatient groin hernia repair? An analysis from the Herniamed Registry.

Authors:  F Köckerling; R Lorenz; W Reinpold; K Zarras; J Conze; A Kuthe; B Lammers; B Stechemesser; F Mayer; R Fortelny; H Hoffmann; J Kukleta; D Weyhe
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 2.920

7.  [The quality of patient care under the German DRG system using as example the inguinal hernia repair].

Authors:  C Rudroff; M Schweins; M M Heiss
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.942

8.  Rare Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications After Transabdominal Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: Results from the Multicenter Wall Hernia Group Registry.

Authors:  Alberto Sartori; Maurizio De Luca; Giulia Noaro; Giacomo Piatto; Giusto Pignata; Alberto Di Leo; Enrico Lauro; Jacopo Andreuccetti
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 9.  Comparison of hernia registries: the CORE project.

Authors:  I Kyle-Leinhase; F Köckerling; L N Jørgensen; A Montgomery; J F Gillion; J A P Rodriguez; W Hope; F Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 10.  The reality of general surgery training and increased complexity of abdominal wall hernia surgery.

Authors:  F Köckerling; A J Sheen; F Berrevoet; G Campanelli; D Cuccurullo; R Fortelny; H Friis-Andersen; J F Gillion; J Gorjanc; D Kopelman; M Lopez-Cano; S Morales-Conde; J Österberg; W Reinpold; R K J Simmermacher; M Smietanski; D Weyhe; M P Simons
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.739

View more
  2 in total

1.  What is the reality in outpatient vs inpatient groin hernia repair? An analysis from the Herniamed Registry.

Authors:  F Köckerling; R Lorenz; W Reinpold; K Zarras; J Conze; A Kuthe; B Lammers; B Stechemesser; F Mayer; R Fortelny; H Hoffmann; J Kukleta; D Weyhe
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 2.920

2.  Nationwide analysis of laparoscopic groin hernia repair in Italy from 2015 to 2020.

Authors:  Monica Ortenzi; Emanuele Botteri; Andrea Balla; Mauro Podda; Mario Guerrieri; Alberto Sartori
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-09-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.