| Literature DB >> 34532362 |
Hiroaki Kuroda1, Yusuke Takahashi1,2, Suguru Shirai1, Hirotomo Takahara1, Takeo Nakada1, Noriaki Sakakura1, Hirokazu Matsushita2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Selected patients in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) responded to the treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have the survival benefit for advanced stages or metastatic status.Entities:
Keywords: C-reactive protein (CRP); Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI); non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); prognostic nutritional index
Year: 2021 PMID: 34532362 PMCID: PMC8421933 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-1492
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839
Figure 1Patient flowchart.
Clinicopathological characteristics of the included patients (N=35)
| Characteristics | Value |
|---|---|
| Age (years), median [range] | 67 [46–79] |
| Sex, male (%) | 21 (60.0) |
| Smoking history, n (%), pack-years (mean ± SD, range) | 28 (80.0), 51.9±25.5 (42.0–61.8) |
| Histology | |
| Adenocarcinoma/squamous/other (n) | 21/7/7 |
| Type of procedures | |
| Pneumonectomy/lobectomy/sublobar (n) | 2/30/3 |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy, n (%) | 19 (54.3) |
| Pathological stage (n) | |
| IA1/IA2/IA3/IB | 2/3/0/3 |
| IIA/IIB | 2/16 |
| IIIA/IIIB | 8/1 |
| Genomic mutations, n (%) | |
| | 7 (20.0) |
| | 6 (17.1) |
| | 1 (2.9) |
| No mutations | 21 (80.0) |
| Treatment, n (%) | |
| Nivolumab (anti-PD-1) | 23 (65.7) |
| Pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) | 9 (25.7) |
| Atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) | 2 (5.7) |
| Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) | 1 (2.9) |
| Performance status (0/1/2) | 10/22/3 |
| Line of ICI treatment (n) (1st/2nd/≥3rd) | 4/15/16 |
SD, standard deviation; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; KRAS, v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; PDL1, program death-ligand 1; CTLA, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4.
Figure 2Clinical outcomes in patients with recurrence after completely pulmonary resection. (A) Progression-free survival after immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy. And (B) overall survival after diagnosis of recurrence.
Univariate and multivariate analyses according to the Cox proportional hazard model for the impact of ICI response on progression-free survival
| Univariate model | Multivariate model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | P | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P | ||
| Male | Female | 0.51 | ||||
| Age (≥70) | <70 | 0.62 | ||||
| Smoker | Never | 0.72 | ||||
| DFI (≤1 year) | >1 year | 0.27 | ||||
| p-IIA/IIB/IIIA/IIIB | pIA or IB | 0.87 | ||||
| Adjuvant (yes) | No | 0.50 | ||||
| No mutation | 0.09 | 1.32 | 0.53–3.29 | 0.55 | ||
| Distant metastasis | No metastasis | 0.27 | ||||
| Treatment line (1 or 2) | ≥3 | 0.88 | ||||
| DCR | No | 0.03 | 2.95 | 1.07–8.14 | 0.04 | |
DFI, disease-free intervals; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; DCR, disease control rate; CI, confidence intervals.
Relationship of laboratory parameters with the disease control rate to ICI monotherapy
| Variables | Value | HR | 95% CI | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre- to post-operation | ||||
| CRP | Increase | 1.65 | 0.26–10.3 | 0.61 |
| Increase +1.0 mg/dL | 1.63 | 0.41–6.39 | 0.49 | |
| Increase +2.0 mg/dL | 2.06 | 0.39–11.0 | 0.40 | |
| LDH | Increase + upper limit of normal | – | – | 0.99 |
| PNI | Decrease +<50 | 2.75 | 0.65–11.6 | 0.17 |
| NLR | Increase +>3 | 1.56 | 0.38–2.63 | 0.64 |
| Post-operation to initiation of ICI | ||||
| CRP | Increase | 11.0 | 2.3–53.6 | <0.01* |
| Increase +1.0 mg/dL | 0.71 | 0.08–0.65 | 0.02* | |
| Increase +2.0 mg/dL | 0.13 | 0.02–1.23 | 0.08 | |
| LDH | Increase + upper limit of normal | 1.09 | 0.24–5.03 | 0.91 |
| PNI | Decrease +<50 | 0.12 | 0.26–0.56 | <0.01* |
| NLR | Increase +>3 | 0.33 | 0.08–1.35 | 0.12 |
| Pre- to post-operation and post-operation to initiation of ICI | ||||
| CRP | Both increase | 0.10 | 0.02–0.58 | 0.01* |
| LDH | Both increase | 0.87 | 0.13–6.00 | 0.89 |
| PNI | Both decrease | 0.10 | 0.02–0.58 | 0.01* |
| NLR | Both increase | 0.69 | 0.14–3.35 | 0.64 |
*P<0.05. CRP, C-reactive protein; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence intervals.
Figure 3PET findings. (A) Representative maximum accumulation (red arrow). (Right) mediastinal lymph node; (central) abdominal lymph node; and (left) left adrenal. (B) Standard uptake value (SUVmax) based on disease control rate (DCR). And (C) tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG).