Svetlana Turcan1, Liudmila Tofan-Scutaru1, Viorel Istrate2, Vitalie Tirbu3. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Moldova. 2. Department of Surgery 4, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Moldova. 3. Synevo Laboratory, Chisinau, Moldova.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whipple's disease (WD) is a rare chronic systemic disease caused by the Gram-positive bacillus Tropheryma whipplei. Despite over 100 years of observation and study history of this disease, it still remains a difficult diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. CLINICAL CASE PRESENTATION: Authors report the case of a 38-year-old man with long-time PPIs treatment because of GERD and no other clinical and paraclinical symptoms. Endoscopic slightly enlarged villi, accumulation of whitish matter at the tip of the villi of distal duodenal mucosa and periodic acid-Schiff staining positive inclusions in the stromal tissue may be typical signs of Whipple's disease. In discussion the possible explication of this case are presented. CONCLUSIONS: It is still a challenge to diagnose Whipple's disease. Histological findings may confirm the diagnosis in patients with a combination of typical clinical manifestations, but histological signs alone are not pathognomic, and are not enough for a definitive diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: Whipple's disease (WD) is a rare chronic systemic disease caused by the Gram-positive bacillus Tropheryma whipplei. Despite over 100 years of observation and study history of this disease, it still remains a difficult diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. CLINICAL CASE PRESENTATION: Authors report the case of a 38-year-old man with long-time PPIs treatment because of GERD and no other clinical and paraclinical symptoms. Endoscopic slightly enlarged villi, accumulation of whitish matter at the tip of the villi of distal duodenal mucosa and periodic acid-Schiff staining positive inclusions in the stromal tissue may be typical signs of Whipple's disease. In discussion the possible explication of this case are presented. CONCLUSIONS: It is still a challenge to diagnose Whipple's disease. Histological findings may confirm the diagnosis in patients with a combination of typical clinical manifestations, but histological signs alone are not pathognomic, and are not enough for a definitive diagnosis.
Entities:
Keywords:
PAS positive inclusions; Whipple’s disease diagnosis
Authors: Isabel A Hujoel; David H Johnson; Benjamin Lebwohl; Daniel Leffler; Sonia Kupfer; Tsung-Teh Wu; Joseph A Murray; Alberto Rubio-Tapia Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: F Biagi; D Balduzzi; P Delvino; A Schiepatti; C Klersy; G R Corazza Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 3.267