Literature DB >> 34526920

Time to Evaluate the Clinical Repercussions of Zika Virus Vertical Transmission? A Systematic Review.

Yasmin Notarbartolo di Villarosa do Amaral1, Jocieli Malacarne1, Paloma Glauca Brandão1, Patrícia Brasil2, Karin Nielsen-Saines3, Maria Elisabeth Lopes Moreira1.   

Abstract

Background: Vertical transmission of Zika Virus (ZIKV) can be associated with several clinical features in newborn infants. The goal of the present review was to analyze the current state of knowledge regarding clinical repercussions following perinatal exposure to ZIKV in children up to 3 years of age.
Methods: A systematic review of published studies was carried out, without the restriction of language or date of publication, identified in the databases PubMed, Virtual Health Library (BVS), Scopus, and Web of Science and the catalog for CAPES theses and dissertations. According to the proposed flowchart, the bibliographic search resulted in 1,563 papers. Of these, according to the eligibility criteria, 70 were selected for systematic review; all were published between 2016 and 2021.
Results: Regarding clinical findings, 19 papers evaluated clinical imaging alterations, 21 ophthalmic manifestations, and 39 evaluated the central nervous system; of these, 15 analyzed neuro-psychomotor development. The remainder evaluated audiological (n = 14), nutritional (n = 14), orthopedic (n = 7), cardiorespiratory (n = 5), genitourinary (n = 3) or endocrinological (n = 1) manifestations.
Conclusion: It is critical for studies to continue monitoring children with antenatal ZIKV exposure as they grow, given the unknown long-term repercussions of ZIKV and the recognized postnatal complications of this infection during pregnancy. Broader descriptions of observed clinical findings are also important in order to characterize the entire spectrum of disease in children. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO REGISTER: CRD42020205947.
Copyright © 2021 Amaral, Malacarne, Brandão, Brasil, Nielsen-Saines and Moreira.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical repercussion; neurodevelopment; neurological repercussion; systematic review; zika virus

Year:  2021        PMID: 34526920      PMCID: PMC8435783          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.699115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychiatry        ISSN: 1664-0640            Impact factor:   5.435


Background

Zika virus (ZIKV) was first reported in East Africa in the 1950 s. In 2007, global attention emerged following an outbreak in Micronesia, and in the following decade, on the island of Yap, in the French Polynesia. The virus spread widely in other Pacific islands over the years, before emerging as a widespread epidemic throughout Latin America (1, 2). In 2015, with the arrival of ZIKV in Brazil, the first studies reported descriptions of women with fever and rash during pregnancy and a possible relationship with congenital microcephaly (3–5). The hypothetical relationship between ZIKV infection in pregnancy and subsequent abnormal newborn findings arose after a very large increase in microcephaly cases was observed in Brazil a few months after ZIKV circulation was identified in the country. Due to its catastrophic repercussions to newbor infants, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared Zika virus a Public Health Emergency in 2016. Gradually over 2017, ZIKV cases declined consistently across the world, although certain tropical areas of the globe became endemic for ZIKV infection, including Central and South America, the Caribbean, and southern Asia. Outbreaks were reported in 2018 in India and Angola, and in France, a locally acquired infection was reported in 2019. One of the driving forces behind the rapid ZIKV epidemic spread was global warming and population mobility which greatly contributed to an increase in the environmental span of Aedes sp. mosquitoes. The possibility of new outbreaks lingers, particularly since arboviral outbreaks are notoriously cyclical. In addition, ZIKV, unlike other arboviral infections, can be transmitted by sexual contact. Therefore, pregnant women may be infected by partners who traveled to endemic areas. Therefore, travel histories should include not only the pregnant patient but their partners as well. Since the virus can persist for extended periods of time in semen, pregnant women could be at risk for infection weeks to months following partner travel to endemic areas. The fact that ZIKV has a very similar genomic structure to dengue viruses 1–4, has important diagnostic implications. Arboviral flaviviruses in the same family as ZIKV include yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis, and West Nile viruses. Hepatitis C virus, another flavivirus, also shares some genomic similarities with ZIKV, which carries potential antiviral treatment implications. Over time ZIKV evolved from the African lineage to the Asian lineage (there is 90% homology between strains), and potentially acquired higher teratogenic potential during the process. The Asian strain of ZIKV was responsible for the recent pandemic. Although ZIKV infection is generally asymptomatic, 20% of patients develop mild symptoms. The clinical features resemble that of rubella virus infection. If symptoms occur, they are present 7–10 days following exposure. Most prominent findings are a maculopapular pruritic rash, arthralgia and conjunctival erythema. Fever is rare and, if present, low grade. Rash, pruritus, conjunctival hyperemia, no fever, no petechiae and no anorexia are used as a ZIKV case definition in endemic settings, where dengue and chikungunya are also prevalent. ZIKV infection is typically self-limited with resolution of symptoms within 1 week. Most patients recover without complications, including pregnant women.The absence of clinical symptoms of ZIKV during pregnancy, however, does not indicate no risk of clinical repercussions to infants. Women with asymptomatic disease can deliver infants with microcephaly. Virus load during maternal infection, disease severity and frequency of symptoms, as well as prior dengue immunity have not been predictive of infant outcomes at birth. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) coined the term Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS) which refers to infants most severely affected by antenatal ZIKV exposure. Nevertheless, many studies demonstrated a spectrum of clinical manifestations in children ranging from absent findings to severe microcephaly. CZS is defined as a constellation of findings at birth including: (1) severe microcephaly (>3 SD below the mean for gestational age and gender); (2) brain abnormalities (subcortical calcifications, ventriculomegaly, cortical thinning, gyral pattern anomalies, hypoplasia of the cerebellum, or corpus callosum anomalies); (3) ocular findings; (4) congenital contractures, also known as arthrogryposis; and (5) neurologic impairment. Microcephaly rates range from 3 to 7% in prospective studies. Most common abnormalities include cerebral calcifications, cortical developmental malformations (lissencephaly, pachygyria, agyria), ventriculomegaly due to brain atrophy, posterior fossa alterations including brainstem or cerebellar hypoplasia, corpus callosum abnormalities, enlarged extra-axial cerebrospinal fluid spaces, and enlarged cisterna magna. Ophthalmologic and sensorineural hearing loss have been reported in 7 and 12% of infants, respectively, followed since the time of maternal infection. They prevail in children with other CNS findings but can also be an isolated finding. Eye manifestations include abnormalities of the retinal pigment epithelium of the macula, optic nerve hypoplasia, chorioretinal atrophy; other abnormalities are colobomas and microphthalmia. Abnormal visual function is identifiable in early infancy among affected children. Eye abnormalities do not tend to progress. Another interesting observation, which highlights some similarities with congenital rubella syndrome is that 10% of children with in utero ZIKV exposure had congenital heart defects in prospective studies. Longer term outcome studies demonstrated that 15% of children may have severe neurodevelopmental problems and sensorineural abnormalities by 3 years of age. Conversely, not all children with abnormalities at birth have later neurodevelopmental repercussions. In the same way, infants found to be normal at birth following maternal infection during pregnancy might have abnormal developmental outcomes years later. Studies demonstrated that close to 1/3 of infants with antenatal ZIKV exposure have below average neurodevelopment or abnormal eye or hearing findings, Secondary microcephaly, which is microcephaly occurring after birth, as well as a higher rate of ASD have been noted in children exposed to antenatal ZIKV, underscoring that long term follow-up is necessary. ZIKV has been shown to cross the placenta and infect placental macrophages. This disrupts neural progenitor cell evolution, leading to microcephaly in animal models. Maternal infection earlier in pregnancy leads to more severe fetal outcomes. CNS malformations are more common with first and second trimesters infections. Late term fetal demise can occur due to placental vascular involvement with focal necrotic vasculitis and placental failure. In summary, adverse outcomes due to ZIKV infection have been described across all trimesters of pregnancy. Miscarriages and fetal growth restriction have also been described. The virus can induce CNS calcifications and bone fusion; craniosynostosis may be present in congenital ZIKV infection. Congenital ZIKV infection has become widely recognized since its original description. Microcephaly is defined as a head circumference of <2 or more standard deviations from the benchmark for gender, age, or gestational age, per the Brazilian Ministry of Health (6). The spectrum of congenital disabilities linked to ZIKV besides microcephaly, such as eye alterations, craniofacial disproportion, and joint and limb deformities, characterize Congenital ZIKV Syndrome (CZS) (7). As previously discussed, clinical alterations and subsequent developmental delays are widely described in babies born without microcephaly, in some cases infants with no stigmata of CZS (8–12). However, there is very little information about future clinical implications of antenatal ZIKV infection in the long term, and this is the target of several studies.

Methods

A systematic review was undertaken to analyze the current state of knowledge regarding repercussions of vertical exposure to ZIKV on child health. The search for pertinent studies was carried out using databases of the Virtual Health Library (BVS), MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus via Capes journals portal, CAPES thesis, and dissertation catalogs. This comprehensive review was undertaken to address the following question: “What is the impact of vertical exposure to ZIKV on clinical, nutritional, and neurodevelopmental aspects in children up to 3 years of age?” This question was formulated per the PICO acronym. The description of this systematic review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines (13). Thus, the following steps were developed: identification of the research question, literature search, data evaluation, analysis of results, and presentation of the review (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Inclusion flowchart (PRISMA).

Inclusion flowchart (PRISMA). The following descriptors were used for the search strategy: “Zika Virus,” “Zika Virus Infection” as search terms, along with “Zika Virus Infection/complications” or the specific clinical outcome designations: “neurogenic bladder,” “urinary bladder,” “Nutritional status,” “nutrition,” “Anthropometry,” “Hearing,” “Orthopedics,” “arthrogryposis,” “vision,” “Neurologic disease,” “Neurologic Manifestations,” “Gastrointestinal Diseases,” “Cardiovascular disease,” “Cardiovascular Abnormalities,” “neurodevelopment.” Boolean operators AND, OR, and NOT were used to relate the blocks to each other, to add at least one word from each block. This systematic review was registered and approved by the PROSPERO systematic review protocol registry database under registration number CRD42020205947. Two independent researchers carried out the search process, which ended in January 2021, with no limits for the period of publication or language restrictions. The bibliographic search resulted in 1,563 papers. Of these, 159 were selected for full-text reading because they evaluated clinical manifestations in cohorts of children with antenatal ZIKV exposure. After extensive selection, 89 papers were excluded because they addressed topics that were not relevant to the present work, leaving 70 studies eligible for this paper, as seen in Figure 1. Eligibility criteria for manuscript selection included full text studies that reported clinical findings/outcomes in cohorts of children with documented antenatal ZIKV exposure. As such, incomplete manuscripts/abstracts, review papers, studies in fetuses, animal studies, in vitro studies, studies in adults only, and qualitative studies were excluded. In addition, manuscripts referenced in papers selected for this study were also investigated, however no further papers were identified. The selected publications were compared in regards to the following parameters: year of publication, study location, sample size, mean age of participants, design type, eligibility criteria, exposure period, presence of a control group, symptoms, controlled confounders in the analysis, study limitations, and main results.

Results

Seventy papers published from 2016 to 2021 were selected following the search. Of these, most were conducted in Brazil (n = 58), followed by Colombia (n = 4), the U.S. (n = 3), Spain (n = 2), French Guiana (n = 1), Mexico (n = 1), and the French Polynesia (n = 1) (Figure 2). The sample size ranged from 1 to 5,673 participants. The population studied ranged in age from 0 days to 48 months, with 9 studies not reporting the participant age range (Table 1).
Figure 2

Zika studies reviewed by year of publication and country of origin.

Table 1

Year of publication, origin, sample size and age of participants of selected studies, 2016–2021.

References Country Sample size (n) Age of follow-up
Almeida et al. (14)Brazil100Not provided
Alves et al. (15)Brazil2419.9 (18– 24 months)
Aragao et al. (16)Brazil12135 days
Bertolli et al. (17)Brazil12024 months
Brasil et al. (5)Brazil207Birth
Carvalho et al. (18)Brazil8213, 2 months
Carvalho et al. (19)Brazil372, 6 (1–5 months)
Carvalho-Sauer et al. (20)Brazil393Birth
Contreras-Capetillo et al. (21)Mexico3Newborns
Costa Monteiro et al. (22)Brazil6913 months
Costa Monteiro et al. (23)Brazil229 months
Cranston et al. (24)Brazil2960 −48 months
de Fatima Vasco Aragao et al. (25)Brazil231 month
de Paula Freitas et al. (26)Brazil291–6 months
de Paula Guimarães et al. (27)Brazil69Not provided
dos Santos et al. (28)Brazil21Not provided
dos Santos et al. (29)Brazil6515 months
Fandiño-Cárdenas et al. (30)Colombia66Exposed: 3.5 months; Control: 3 months
Felix et al. (31)French Guiana22–4 months
Ferreira et al. (32)Brazil3421 months
França et al. (33)Brazil2420.5 months
Jucá et al. (34)Brazil115Not provided
Kanda et al. (35)Brazil238.3 months
C Lage et al. (36)Brazil1024.1 months
Leal et al. (37)Brazil700–10 months
Leal et al. (38)Brazil94 (2–7 months)
Leal et al. (39)Brazil1Birth−1 month
Leal et al. (40)Brazil5722.9 months
Leite et al. (41)Brazil4510 months
Linden et al. (42)Brazil37–19 months
Marques Abramov et al. (43)Brazil19Not provided
Melo et al. (44)Brazil5914.7 months
Meneses et al. (45)Brazil87Birth
Lopes Moreira et al. (10)Brazil1042–18 months
Moura da Silva et al. (46)Brazil481–8 months
Mulkey et al. (47)Colombia70Birth−18 months
Nielsen-Saines et al. (11)Brazil21618 months
Oliveira-Filho et al. (48)Brazil27101 days
Orofino et al. (49)Brazil18697 (1–376 days)
Ospina et al. (50)Colombia5,673Birth
Pacheco et al. (51)Colombia6020–30 months
Peçanha et al. (52)Brazil841st Moment: 9.7 months 2nd Moment: 15.3 months
Petribu et al. (53)Brazil371st Moment: 1 to 138 days (median of 11.5 days)2nd Moment: 105 to 509 days (median of 415 days)
Pinato et al. (54)Brazil1365–24 months
Pone (55)Brazil106Not provided
Pool et al. (56)Brazil110Newborn period
Rajapakse et al. (57)United States43–10 days of life; 1–86 days
Rice et al. (58)United States1,450≥12 months
Rocha et al. (59)Brazil1749 months
Roma et al. (60)Brazil20Newborns
Santana et al. (61)Brazil1821.5 months
Satterfield-Nash et al. (62)Brazil1922 months
Soares et al. (63)Brazil115Birth – 3 months
Soriano-Arandes et al. (64)Spain1431, 4, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months
Subissi et al. (65)French Polynesia12323 months
Sulleiro et al. (66)Spain124 months
Trigueiro et al. (67)Brazil20Not provided
Tsui et al. (68)Brazil22444 days (12–99 days)
van der Linden et al. (69)Brazil2116–30 months (mean 16 months at the time of the last examination)
van der Linden et al. (70)Brazil1305–12 months
van der Linden et al. (71)Brazil7Not provided
de Vasconcelos et al. (72)Brazil2236 months
Ventura et al. (73)Brazil402.2 months
Ventura et al. (73)Brazil325.7 (4–7 months)
Ventura et al. (74)Brazil204Exposed: 8.5 months (6–13 months)Controls: 8.4 months (5–12 months)
Veras Gonçalves et al. (75)Brazil3041 months
Verçosa et al. (76)Brazil703 months
Walker et al. (77)United States95Newborn period
Zin et al. (12)Brazil112Not provided
Zin et al. (78)Brazil1733–6 months
Zika studies reviewed by year of publication and country of origin. Year of publication, origin, sample size and age of participants of selected studies, 2016–2021. Most studies were (n = 37) descriptive in design, such as case series or case reports, followed by cross-sectional studies (n = 17), cohort studies (n = 14), and case-control studies (n = 2). Information on study limitations was described in 40 studies; the most prevalent limitation was the limited sample size, lack of a control group, type or lack of laboratory confirmation for ZIKV, loss to follow-up, and use of secondary data for analysis. Details on duration of follow-up, sample size and study design are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3

Description of studies reviewed by duration of follow-up (A), number of participants (B) and study design (C).

Description of studies reviewed by duration of follow-up (A), number of participants (B) and study design (C). Concerning clinical findings, 19 papers evaluated clinical imaging alterations, 21 ophthalmic manifestations, 39 the central nervous system, including 15 which evaluated neuro-psychomotor development. Additional studies included audiological (n = 14), nutritional (n = 14), orthopedic (n = 7), cardiorespiratory (n = 5), genitourinary (n = 3) or endocrinological (n = 1) manifestations. It is noteworthy that some articles described more than one organ system and multiple clinical findings (Table 2).
Table 2

Study design, clinical abnormalities and development screening test, 2016–2021.

References Study design Clinical abnormalities Developmental screening test
Almeida et al. (14)Case seriesHearing abnormalities; Eye abnormalities
Alves et al. (15)Case seriesNeurodevelopmental delaysDenver Development Screening Test II
Aragao et al. (16)Case seriesJoint and limb deformities
Bertolli et al. (17)CohortNeurodevelopmental delaysASQ 3
Brasil et al. (5)CohortCerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)
Carvalho et al. (18)Case seriesNeurological abnormalities; Neurodevelopmental delays; Cerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)
Carvalho et al. (19)Case seriesNeurological abnormalities
Carvalho-Sauer et al. (20)Cross-sectionalGrowth and nutrition
Contreras-Capetillo et al. (21)Case seriesJoint and limb deformities; Growth and nutrition; Cerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)
Costa Monteiro et al. (22)Case seriesGenito-urinary abnormalities (Criptorquidia, Neurogenic bladder)
Costa Monteiro et al. (23)Case seriesGenito-urinary abnormalities (Criptorquidia, Neurogenic bladder)
Cranston et al. (24)CohortCardiological abnormalities; Hearing abnormalities; Eye abnormalities; Neurological abnormalities; Growth and nutrition; Neurodevelopmental delaysBayley III
de Fatima Vasco Aragao et al. (25)Retrospective case seriesCerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)
de Paula Freitas et al. (26)Case seriesEye abnormalities
de Paula Guimarães et al. (27)Case seriesHearing abnormalities; Eye abnormalities; Neurological abnormalities
dos Santos et al. (28)Descriptive Longitudinal StudyGrowth and nutrition
dos Santos et al. (29)Descriptive Longitudinal StudyGrowth and nutrition
Fandiño-Cárdenas et al. (30)CohortHearing abnormalities
Felix et al. (31)Case reportNeurological abnormalities
Ferreira et al. (32)Cross-sectionalNeurodevelopmental delaysCommon Brief ICF Core Set for CP
França et al. (33)Cross-sectionalGrowth and nutrition; Neurodevelopmental delaysBayley III
Jucá et al. (34)Case seriesCerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)
Kanda et al. (35)Cross-sectionalNeurological abnormalities
C Lage et al. (36)Cross-sectionalJoint and limb deformities; Hearing abnormalities; Eye abnormalities; Neurological abnormalities
Leal et al. (37)Case seriesHearing abnormalities
Leal et al. (38)Case seriesGastrointestinal/pulmonary abnormalities
Leal et al. (39)Case reportHearing abnormalities
Leal et al. (40)Cross-sectional study nested in a cohortAdenoid hypertroph
Leite et al. (41)Cross-sectionalHearing abnormalities
Linden et al. (42)Case seriesJoint and limb deformities; Neurological abnormalities
Marques Abramov et al. (43)Cross-sectionalHearing abnormalities
Melo et al. (44)Cross-sectionalNeurodevelopmental delaysNot provided
Meneses et al. (45)Case seriesEye abnormalities; Neurological abnormalities; Cerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations); Gastrointestinal/pulmonary abnormalities
Lopes Moreira et al. (10)CohortNeurodevelopmental delaysBayley III
Moura da Silva et al. (46)Case seriesGastrointestinal/pulmonary abnormalities; Joint and limb deformities; Neurological abnormalities; Cerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)
Mulkey et al. (47)CohortNeurodevelopmental delaysWarner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functio-l Skills (WIDEA) and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS)
Nielsen-Saines et al. (11)CohortHearing abnormalities; Neurodevelopmental delaysBayley III
Oliveira-Filho et al. (48)CohortGastrointestinal/pulmonary abnormalities; Neurological abnormalities; Growth and nutrition; Cerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)
Orofino et al. (49)Cross-sectionalCardiological abnormalities
Ospina et al. (50)Retrospective cohortEye abnormalities; Growth and nutrition; Cerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)
Pacheco et al. (51)Descriptive studyHearing abnormalities; Eye abnormalities; Neurological abnormalities
Peçanha et al. (52)Case seriesNeurodevelopmental delaysBayley III
Petribu et al. (53)Case seriesCerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)
Pinato et al. (54)Cross-sectionalNeurological abnormalities
Pone (55)Cross-sectionalCerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)
Pool et al. (56)Retrospective cohortHearing abnormalities; Eye abnormalities; Neurological abnormalities; Cerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)
Rajapakse et al. (57)Case seriesJoint and limb deformities; Gastrointestinal/pulmonary abnormalities
Rice et al. (58)Descriptive studyNeurodevelopmental delaysNot provided
Rocha et al. (59)Case-controlCerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)
Roma et al. (60)Case seriesHearing abnormalities; Eye abnormalities; Cerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)
Santana et al. (61)Case seriesGastrointestinal/pulmonary abnormalities; Cardiological abnormalities; Eye abnormalities; Neurological abnormalities; Neurodevelopmental delays; Cerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)Not provided
Satterfield-Nash et al. (62)Case seriesHearing abnormalities; Neurological abnormalities; Neurodevelopmental delaysASQ 3
Soares et al. (63)CohortGrowth and nutrition
Soriano-Arandes et al. (64)CohortHearing abnormalities; Neurological abnormalities
Subissi et al. (65)Case-controlNeurodevelopmental delaysNot provided
Sulleiro et al. (66)Case reportNeurological abnormalities; Growth and nutrition
Trigueiro et al. (67)Cross-sectionalEye abnormalities
Tsui et al. (68)Case seriesEye abnormalities
van der Linden et al. (69)Descriptive studyNeurological abnormalities
van der Linden et al. (70)Case seriesNeurological abnormalities; Cerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)
van der Linden et al. (71)CohortNeurological abnormalities
de Vasconcelos et al. (72)Case seriesGenito-urinary abnormalities (Cryptorchidism/Neurogenic bladder)
Ventura et al. (73)Cross-sectionalEye abnormalities
Ventura et al. (73)Cross-sectionalEye abnormalities
Ventura et al. (74)Cross-sectionalEye abnormalities; Neurological abnormalities
Veras Gonçalves et al. (75)Case seriesEye abnormalities; Endocrine disfunction
Verçosa et al. (76)Case seriesEye abnormalities
Walker et al. (77)Retrospective cohortEye abnormalities; Neurological abnormalities; Cerebral abnormalities (Microcephaly, Calcification, Hydrocephaly, Cerebral atrophy, Cerebellar alterations)
Zin et al. (12)Case seriesJoint and limb deformities; Eye abnormalities; Neurological abnormalities
Zin et al. (78)Cross-sectionalHearing abnormalities
Study design, clinical abnormalities and development screening test, 2016–2021. The most prevalent clinical imaging abnormalities of the central nervous system included microcephaly, ventriculomegaly, cortical malformations, mega cisterna magna, hydrocephalus, cerebellum or brain stem hypoplasia, and cerebral calcifications, especially at the junction between the cortical and subcortical white matter (16, 18, 21, 25, 34, 45, 46, 48, 50, 53, 56, 59–61, 75, 77). One manuscript also reported a decline in head circumference growth (70). Regarding abdominal imaging, there were no characteristic abnormalities identified in ZIKV exposed children that differed from descriptions in the general population. Imaging results were normal in 95.3% of 106 children who underwent abdominal ultrasound (55). Of five patients with abnormal abdominal ultrasounds, one (16.6%) had a splenic cyst, one (16.6%) had a diaphragmatic eventration, one (16.6%) had biliary lithiasis, one (16.6%) had multi-cystic dysplastic kidney, and two (33.4%) had a dilated renal pelvis. The prevalence of these alterations was 1.9% for renal pelvis dilatation and 0.9% for other abnormalities (55). All the papers that evaluated the central nervous system found neurological alterations, and the main ones were seizure, epilepsy, irritability, pyramidal syndrome, sleep disorders, and hyperexcitability (5, 12, 18, 19, 27, 31, 35, 36, 42, 45, 46, 48, 50, 51, 54, 56, 61, 62, 66, 69–71, 74, 77). Regarding neuro-psychomotor development, all 15 papers reported motor, cognitive, or language delay (10, 11, 15, 17, 18, 24, 32, 33, 44, 47, 52, 58, 61, 62, 65). Noteworthy is that, in one paper, the authors reported autism spectrum disorder in three previously healthy children in the second year of life (11). All studies that performed ophthalmological evaluations exposed some alteration, such as microphthalmia, fundoscopic alterations, macular atrophy, optic nerve abnormalities, strabismus and visual acuity defects (12, 14, 27, 36, 45, 50, 51, 56, 60, 61, 67, 68, 73–79). Twelve of 14 papers that evaluated audiological manifestations in children reported hearing disorders (11, 14, 27, 36, 37, 39, 43, 51, 56, 60, 62, 64) and two did not observe any abnormalities (30, 41). Two papers reported unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis (45, 57), and another two found echocardiographic abnormalities (49, 61). These abnormalities were characterized by dilatation of the right atrium and the right ventricle, demonstrating an overload of the right heart chambers. In a study of children with Zika-related microcephaly, adenoid hypertrophy and symptoms of respiratory obstruction were reported (40). Regarding genitourinary characteristics, studies reported neurogenic bladder and cryptorchidism (22, 23, 72). The most common orthopedic alteration was arthrogryposis (12, 16, 21, 36, 42, 46, 57). All papers that evaluated gastrointestinal manifestations reported dysphagia (38, 46, 48, 61). Regarding the nutritional status of children exposed to antenatal ZIKV, nine papers found anthropometric alterations such as low birth weight and growth retardation (14, 20, 21, 28, 29, 33, 48, 50, 63, 66) and one study observed endocrine dysfunctions in children with Zika-related microcephaly (75).

Discussion

In this section we discuss the main results of manuscripts selected for this systematic review to assess the main potential clinical alterations described in antenatally ZIKV-exposed children to date.

Neurologic, Neuroimaging and Neurodevelopmental Findings

Concerning clinical imaging alterations, (16, 34, 53, 59), severe brain damage was reported in CNS imaging studies in most children with antenatal exposure to ZIKV. The most common features identified were brain calcifications at the junction between cortical and subcortical white matter; these were associated with malformations of cortical development, usually with a simplified gyrus pattern and a predominance of pachygyria or polymicrogyria in the frontal lobes. Studies also identified an increased/dilated cisterna magna, corpus callosum abnormalities (which could be either hypoplasia or hypogenesis), ventriculomegaly, delayed myelination, and hypoplasia of the brain stem and/or cerebellum. Petribu et al. (53) observed an interesting finding in that brain calcifications in children with confirmed or presumed CZS tended to decrease over time. This implies that brain calcifications should not be considered essential for diagnosis of CZS in children who present late to medical attention. Decrease in brain calcifications over time, however, was not associated with clinical improvement. Santana et al. (61) reported that all children in their cohort had microcephaly, spasticity, and delayed neurological development. Epilepsy was found in 15 of 18 cases (83%). In a case series, Van Der Linden et al. (70) observed dystonic postures and other frequent and potentially disabling extrapyramidal signs. The study emphasized that early identification of extrapyramidal findings may help recognize neurodevelopmental problems and assist with implementation of rehabilitation, potentially influencing better strategies for rehabilitative interventions. When analyzing sleep disorders in their cross-sectional study, Pinato et al. (54) showed that the CZS group of children had a shorter total sleep time and night sleep duration than the control group. However, no correlation was found between age and sleep patterns. In a series of cases that assessed infants exposed to congenital ZIKV who were asymptomatic at birth, neurodevelopmental delay was identified through the use of the Bayley-III scale assessment tool (52). The abnormalities occurred mainly in the language domain during the first two years of life. The Z-score of the head circumference was significantly lower in the group with developmental delay, with the simultaneous presence of neurological abnormalities, which indicates a possible action of ZIKV infection in the developing brain (24). Nielsen-Saines et al. (11) observed that, among the children evaluated by Bayley-III, 12% scored below two standard deviations (i.e., a score <70; a score of 100 ± 2 SD is the variation) in at least one functional domain; 28% of children scored between −1 and −2 SD in any domain (scores <85–70). Language function was most affected, with 35% of 146 children being below average. The authors described that neurodevelopmental outcomes were improved in female children, term babies, children with normal eye exames, and whose mothers were infected with ZIKV later in pregnancy. Mulkey et al. (47) found that infants with in utero ZIKV exposure without features of CZS were also at risk for abnormal neurodevelopment in the first 18 months of life.

Eye Findings

Regarding ophthalmological findings, studies (12, 26, 67, 68, 73, 74, 76, 78–80) found an association between congenital infection due to presumed exposure to ZIKV and macular lesions, macular circumscribed chorio-retinal atrophy, focal-spotted retinal pigment epithelium, optic nerve pallor, early-onset strabismus, nystagmus, and low visual acuity. Also, ocular involvement (macular and eye fundus abnormalities) in babies with presumed congenital ZIKV infection was most frequently observed in babies with a smaller head circumference at the time of birth and whose mothers were infected in the first trimester of pregnancy (73).

Hearing Deficits

Of the papers that assessed audiological function, the main findings were a statistically significant increase in latencies of waves I and III, compared to wave V, absence of otoacoustic emissions, and sensorineural hearing loss (37, 43). In most hearing loss cases associated with congenital infections, damage to the auditory system is due to cochlear involvement (81). Similar injuries are likely to be responsible for hearing loss in children with congenital ZIKV infection, although histological studies need to confirm this (39). In a cross-sectional study, when evaluating 45 children with a mean age of 10 months, Leite et al. (41) found no association between exposure to ZIKV during pregnancy and audiological alterations. Similarly, when comparing children exposed and not exposed to ZIKV, Fandiño-Cárdenas et al. (30), in their cohort study of 66 exposed children did not observe hearing loss in the first two years of life. In conclusion, hearing loss due to congenital ZIKV can be sensorineural, neural, conductive, isolated, or mixed. Therefore, a complete hearing assessment should be performed on all ZIKV-infected patients to rule out auditory neuropathy syndrome and sensorineural hearing loss (82).

Cardiac Findings/Congenital Heart Disease

When analyzing the cardiovascular system of ZIKV-exposed children, Santana et al. (61) found echocardiographic abnormalities suggesting tropism of ZIKV to tissue beyond the central nervous system. Corroborating this finding, Orofino et al. (49) found a higher frequency of cardiac alterations in ZIKV-exposed babies than in the general population. However, none of these defects were severe. Therefore, the authors suggested that recommendations for performance of fetal echocardiograms in women with ZIKV infection during pregnancy and recommendations for postnatal infant echocardiogram should follow general infant population guidelines.

Genito-Urinary Findings

All studies concerning genitourinary characteristics were performed in Brazil, two in the state of Rio de Janeiro and one in Pernambuco. Costa Monteiro et al. (22, 23) found that more than 90% of children with microcephaly in their series had neurogenic bladder, a health condition known to cause kidney damage when left untreated. On this theme, de Vasconcelos et al. (72) published a case series describing cryptorchidism in 3-year-old children with ZIKV-related microcephaly.

Nutrition, Gastro-Intestinal Findings and Feeding Difficulties

Regarding the nutritional status of children exposed to ZIKV, nine papers described anthropometric changes such as low birth weight and growth restriction (20, 21, 28, 29, 33, 48, 50, 66). In a cohort study, Soares et al. (63) found differences in arm and arm muscle circumference and fat-free mass in children from 1 to 3 months of age. Weight and length at 3 months of age were lower in ZIKV-exposed infants. Similarly, Carvalho-Sauer et al. (20) concluded that low birth weight in children with CZS was 4-fold greater as compared to children without CZS. Furthermore, prematurity and cesarean delivery were associated with low birth weight in exposed children. It should also be noted that most children with CZS were born to mothers of African heritage, single, and with less years of education, suggesting CZS disproportionately affected disenfranchised populations (28, 63). Leal et al. (38) described a delay in the initial pharyngeal phase of swallowing. This combined with significant oral dysfunction, increases the risk of oral aspiration, predominantly with liquid foods. Also, Santana et al. (61) reported that four of 18 patients who had swallowing impairment were fed by gastrostomy. In addition, Leal et al. (40) in a cross-sectional study nested in a cohort study, found a high prevalence of adenoid hypertrophy in children with Zika-related microcephaly, with consequent upper airway obstruction leading to chronic upper airway obstructive disorder, secretory otitis media and subsequent dysphagia (40). Abdominal imaging studies on the other hand showed no characteristic findings that were higher than those observed in the general population (55).

Musculo-Skeletal Findings

Regarding orthopedic abnormalities, all seven papers described the presence of arthrogryposis in children with congenital zika, often present in both upper and lower extremities. A study by Aragão et al. (16) found that 75% of children with microcephaly and 100% of those with arthrogryposis had reduced thickness of the thoracic spinal cord. However, the latter group had evidence of narrowing of the entire spinal cord, with severely reduced spinal cord anterior roots. The authors concluded that it is crucial to consider Zika virus infection in the differential diagnosis of congenital diseases of the spinal cord and anterior nerve root if mother-infant pair have any risk factors for ZIKV antenatal exposure. This is especially relevant in mild cases where microcephaly is absent, and the only clinical manifestation is, for example, abnormal joints. On the other hand, health professionals should pay close attention when monitoring children from an epidemic area with mild or no clinical signs of spinal cord and anterior nerve root lesions, as they may have future problems with neuro-psychomotor development.

Endocrinologic Findings

Regarding the endocrine system, the most prevalent and clinically relevant problems were pubertal dysfunctions, thyroid disease, growth faltering and obesity. These conditions require careful monitoring and highlight the need for endocrine evaluations in children with CZS, particularly those with microcephaly. Early diagnosis and referral to appropriate treatment in this situation may often be necessary (75).

Need for Long Term Follow-Up

The repercussions of maternal infection during pregnancy on child development have been extensively described in the literature in regards to classic teratogenic pathogens responsible for TORCH syndromes (26). Fetal infection often triggers a systemic inflammatory response which may persist after birth, compounding further damage to the brain. This is one of the prevailing hypotheses on the pathogenesis of brain injury (26). Lesions associated with deep gray matter injury, vascular compromise and neural progenitor cell dysfunction have also been described (83–85). Saad et al. (86) made the same recommendation in reviewing the most frequent clinical findings in children born to women with confirmed ZIKV infection during pregnancy. They described a broad spectrum of abnormalities resulting from an inflammatory reaction to the virus or a direct effect of the virus itself, causing damage to the CNS and neurological abnormalities which potentially manifest over time. These published results describing developmental delay and other neuro-sensory deficits which may manifest later in life point to the need for continued monitoring of children with antenatal ZIKV exposure to assess risks of learning and behavioral disorders in the long term (85).

Conclusion

In this systematic review, the most relevant findings were injuries to the infant central nervous system. CZS is a neurotropic disease with several associated abnormalities. Although the majority of published studies were from Brazil, there were no regional differences across the country and also in comparison to other countries in Latin America. Another important finding which the studies underscored is the later delay in development that may subsequently occur in an apparently normal infant at the time of birth. Finally, due to the vulnerability of women and children and the severe repercussions of ZIKV infection in pregnancy, studies should continue to monitor these children as they age. Broader descriptions of clinical findings are also important to further characterize the spectrum of disease in children. Prospective studies evaluating infants and children with antenatal ZIKV exposure may be able to describe the actual prevalence of adverse pregnancy, infant and childhood outcomes in this population. Prompt recognition of clinical abnormalities allows for implementation of early interventions which can improve later neurodevelopmental pathways in children born to mothers with gestational ZIKV infection.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author Contributions

YA, JM, and PGB did the manuscript search, reviewed all the literature and drafted the paper, and approved the final text. PB, KN-S, and MM formulated the research question, performed the analysis and draft of the paper, and approved the final text. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor declared to have joint publications with the authors PB, KN-S, and MM.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  84 in total

1.  Visual impairment evaluation in 119 children with congenital Zika syndrome.

Authors:  Liana O Ventura; Camila V Ventura; Natália de C Dias; Isabelle G Vilar; Adriana L Gois; Tiago E Arantes; Luciene C Fernandes; Michael F Chiang; Marilyn T Miller; Linda Lawrence
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  Sleep EEG patterns in infants with congenital Zika virus syndrome.

Authors:  Maria Durce Costa Gomes Carvalho; Demócrito de Barros Miranda-Filho; Vanessa van der Linden; Paula Fabiana Sobral; Regina Coeli Ferreira Ramos; Maria Ângela Wanderley Rocha; Marli Tenório Cordeiro; Sarah Pinheiro de Alencar; Magda Lahorgue Nunes
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Auditory brainstem function in microcephaly related to Zika virus infection.

Authors:  Dimitri Marques Abramov; Tania Saad; Saint-Clair Gomes-Junior; Daniel de Souza E Silva; Izabel Araújo; Maria Elizabeth Lopes Moreira; Vladimir V Lazarev
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Visual function in infants with antenatal Zika virus exposure.

Authors:  Andrea A Zin; Irena Tsui; Julia D Rossetto; Stephanie L Gaw; Luiza M Neves; Olivia A Zin; Lorena Haefeli; Joel Carlos Barros Silveira Filho; Kristina Adachi; Marcos Vinicius da Silva Pone; Sheila Moura Pone; Natalia Molleri; Jose Paulo Pereira; Rubens Belfort; Vaithilingaraja Arumugaswami; Zilton Vasconcelos; Patricia Brasil; Karin Nielsen-Saines; Maria Elisabeth Lopes Moreira
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  Hydrocephalus associated to congenital Zika syndrome: does shunting improve clinical features?

Authors:  Eduardo Jucá; André Pessoa; Erlane Ribeiro; Rafaela Menezes; Saile Kerbage; Thayse Lopes; Luciano Pamplona Cavalcanti
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 1.532

6.  Neurogenic bladder findings in patients with Congenital Zika Syndrome: A novel condition.

Authors:  Lucia Maria Costa Monteiro; Glaura Nisya de Oliveira Cruz; Juliana Marin Fontes; Tania Regina Dias Saad Salles; Marcia Cristina Bastos Boechat; Ana Carolina Monteiro; Maria Elizabeth Lopes Moreira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Infants with microcephaly due to ZIKA virus exposure: nutritional status and food practices.

Authors:  Samira Fernandes Morais Dos Santos; Fernanda Valente Mendes Soares; Andrea Dunshee de Abranches; Ana Carolina Carioca da Costa; Maria Elisabeth Lopes Moreira; Vania de Matos Fonseca
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Cryptorchidism in Children with Zika-Related Microcephaly.

Authors:  Rômulo A L de Vasconcelos; Ricardo A A Ximenes; Adriano A Calado; Celina M T Martelli; Andreia V Gonçalves; Elizabeth B Brickley; Thalia V B de Araújo; Maria Angela Wanderley Rocha; Demócrito de B Miranda-Filho
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.345

10.  Unilateral Phrenic Nerve Palsy in Infants with Congenital Zika Syndrome.

Authors:  Nipunie S Rajapakse; Kevin Ellsworth; Rachael M Liesman; Mai Lan Ho; Nancy Henry; Elitza S Theel; Adam Wallace; Ana Catarina Ishigami Alvino; Luisa Medeiros de Mello; Jucille Meneses
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.