| Literature DB >> 34524969 |
Ying Hua1, Jinqiong Fang1, Xiaocong Yao2, Zhongxin Zhu2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity and osteoporosis are major public health issues globally. The prevalence of these two diseases prompts the need to better understand the relationship between them. Previous studies, however, have yielded controversial findings on this issue. Therefore, our aim in this study was to evaluate the independent association between waist circumference (WC), as a marker of obesity, and the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine among middle-aged adults using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).Entities:
Keywords: NHANES; bone health; central obesity; osteoporosis; waist circumference
Year: 2021 PMID: 34524969 PMCID: PMC8558899 DOI: 10.1530/EC-21-0352
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endocr Connect ISSN: 2049-3614 Impact factor: 3.335
Figure 1Flowchart of sample selection.
The weighted characteristics of middle-aged adults from NHANES 2011 to 2018.
| Men ( | Premenopausal women ( | Postmenopausal women ( | Unrecorded menstruation ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 49.3 ± 5.8 | 45.8 ± 4.0 | 52.9 ± 4.8 | 48.6 ± 5.6 | <0.001 |
| Race (%) | <0.001 | ||||
| Non-Hispanic White | 64.1 | 61.1 | 66.1 | 50.7 | |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 10.7 | 12.3 | 13.1 | 13.3 | |
| Mexican American | 9.2 | 10.3 | 6.7 | 8.9 | |
| Other race | 16.0 | 16.3 | 14.0 | 27.1 | |
| Education level (%) | <0.001 | ||||
| Less than high school | 16.1 | 13.3 | 13.2 | 19.3 | |
| High school | 24.3 | 16.0 | 24.5 | 14.6 | |
| More than high school | 59.6 | 70.6 | 62.3 | 66.1 | |
| Income–poverty ratio | 3.2 ± 1.6 | 3.3 ± 1.6 | 3.2 ± 1.6 | 2.8 ± 1.7 | 0.005 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.6 ± 4.4 | 28.6 ± 6.4 | 29.0 ± 5.8 | 28.1 ± 6.2 | 0.072 |
| Smoked at least 100 cigarettes in life (%) | <0.001 | ||||
| Yes | 49.6 | 34.6 | 42.3 | 25.8 | |
| No | 50.4 | 65.4 | 57.7 | 74.2 | |
| Moderate recreational activities (%) | 0.094 | ||||
| Yes | 47.5 | 51.2 | 46.5 | 45.1 | |
| No | 52.5 | 48.8 | 53.5 | 54.9 | |
| Diabetes status (%) | <0.001 | ||||
| Yes | 10.4 | 7.6 | 9.7 | 8.1 | |
| No | 87.4 | 90.4 | 88.0 | 90.4 | |
| Borderline | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 1.5 | |
| Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L) | 5.1 ± 1.6 | 4.1 ± 1.3 | 4.8 ± 1.6 | 4.5 ± 1.5 | <0.001 |
| Total protein (g/L) | 71.1 ± 4.4 | 70.2 ± 4.3 | 70.6 ± 4.4 | 70.9 ± 4.6 | <0.001 |
| Serum uric acid (umol/L) | 354.4 ± 72.1 | 265.3 ± 60.7 | 285.7 ± 68.2 | 263.5 ± 62.3 | <0.001 |
| Serum phosphorus (mmol/L) | 1.16 ± 0.18 | 1.18 ± 0.17 | 1.24 ± 0.16 | 1.20 ± 0.18 | <0.001 |
| Serum calcium (mmol/L) | 2.34 ± 0.08 | 2.30 ± 0.08 | 2.35 ± 0.08 | 2.33 ± 0.09 | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 101.5 ± 11.7 | 94.7 ± 14.0 | 97.4 ± 13.0 | 93.6 ± 14.7 | <0.001 |
| Lumbar bone mineral density (mg/cm2) | 1024.6 ± 159.3 | 1070.7 ± 143.0 | 987.7 ± 155.5 | 1031.6 ± 132.0 | <0.001 |
Mean ± s.d. for continuous variables: P value was calculated by weighted linear regression model. % for categorical variables: P value was calculated by weighted chi-square test.
Association between waist circumference (cm) and lumbar bone mineral density (mg/cm2) among middle-aged adults from NHANES 2011 to 2018.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waist circumference | −0.3 (−0.6, 0.1) | −0.2 (−0.5, 0.1) | −2.2 (−3.0, −1.4)*** | −2.2 (−3.0, −1.4)*** |
| Stratified by gender | ||||
| Men ( | −0.6 (−1.1, −0.1)* | −0.4 (−1.0, 0.1) | −3.0 (−4.2, −1.8)*** | −2.8 (−4.0, −1.6)*** |
| Premenopausal women ( | −0.1 (−0.7, 0.5) | −0.3 (−0.9, 0.3) | −2.7 (−4.2, −1.3)** | −2.6 (−4.1, −1.1)*** |
| Postmenopausal women ( | 0.8 (0.1, 1.5)* | 0.7 (−0.0, 1.3) | −0.7 (−2.2, 0.8) | −0.7 (−2.2, 0.8) |
| Unrecorded menstruation ( | −0.4 (−1.7, 0.8) | −0.6 (−1.9, 0.6) | −0.7 (−3.8, 2.5) | 0.2 (−3.0, 3.4) |
| Stratified by race | ||||
| Non-Hispanic White ( | −0.6 (−1.1, 0.0) | −0.3 (−0.9, 0.2) | −2.5 (−3.8, −1.1)*** | −2.4 (−3.8, −1.1)*** |
| Non-Hispanic Black ( | −0.3 (−1.0, 0.5) | 0.0 (−0.7, 0.7) | −3.2 (−4.9, −1.5)*** | −3.7 (−5.4, −2.0)*** |
| Mexican American ( | −0.3 (−1.2, 0.5) | −0.1 (−0.9, 0.7) | −1.1 (−3.0, 0.8) | −1.7 (−3.5, 0.2) |
| Other race ( | 0.5 (−0.1, 1.1) | 0.7 (0.0, 1.3)* | 0.4 (−1.1, 2.0) | 0.4 (−1.2, 1.9) |
| Diabetes status | ||||
| Yes ( | 0.8 (−0.2, 1.7) | 0.1 (−0.9, 1.0) | −1.5 (−3.6, 0.5) | −1.2 (−3.2, 0.8) |
| No ( | −0.6 (−0.9, −0.2)** | −0.4 (−0.8, −0.0)* | −2.6 (−3.4, −1.7)*** | −2.4 (−3.2, −1.5)*** |
| Borderline ( | 1.4 (−0.8, 3.5) | 0.7 (−1.6, 2.9) | −1.7 (−6.1, 2.7) | −1.1 (-5.9, 3.7) |
Model 1: no covariates were adjusted. Model 2: age, gender, and race were adjusted. Model 3: model 2 plus BMI were adjusted. Model 4: model 3 plus education level, income–poverty ratio, moderate recreational activities, smoked at least 100 cigarettes in life, diabetes status, blood urea nitrogen, total protein, serum uric acid, serum phosphorus, and serum calcium were adjusted. In the subgroup analysis stratified by gender, race or diabetes status, the model is not adjusted for the stratification variable itself.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Association between waist circumference (cm) and lumbar bone mineral density (mg/cm2) among middle-aged adults from NHANES 2011 to 2018, stratified by BMI.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | ||||
| BMI (< 25 kg/m2) ( | −2.7 (−4.3, −1.0)** | −1.3 (−3.1, 0.4) | −1.6 (−4.1, 0.9) | −2.0 (−4.5, 0.6) |
| BMI (25–29.9 kg/m2) ( | −1.3 (−2.8, 0.2) | −1.6 (−3.1, −0.1)* | −2.5 (−4.5, −0.5)* | −1.8 (−3.8, 0.2) |
| BMI (≥30 kg/m2) ( | −1.3 (−2.8, 0.1) | −1.5 (−2.9, −0.1)* | −4.5 (−6.5, −2.4)*** | −4.1 (−6.3, −2.0)*** |
| Premenopausal women | ||||
| BMI (< 25 kg/m2) ( | −1.2 (−3.9, 1.5) | −0.9 (−3.7, 1.8) | −6.2 (−9.7, −2.7)*** | −5.7 (−9.4, −2.0)** |
| BMI (25–29.9 kg/m2) ( | −0.8 (−3.3, 1.7) | −0.6 (−3.1, 1.8) | −1.5 (−4.3, 1.3) | −0.9 (−3.8, 2.0) |
| BMI (≥30 kg/m2) ( | −0.0 (−1.4, 1.3) | −0.6 (−2.0, 0.7) | −2.1 (−4.1, −0.2)* | −2.1 (−4.2, 0.0) |
| Postmenopausal women | ||||
| BMI (< 25 kg/m2) ( | 1.2 (−1.7, 4.1) | 0.8 (−2.0, 3.5) | −5.9 (−9.7, −2.1)** | −5.6 (−9.7, −1.6)** |
| BMI (25–29.9 kg/m2) ( | 0.2 (−2.1, 2.5) | 0.6 (−1.7, 2.9) | −0.3 (−3.3, 2.6) | −1.4 (−4.4, 1.7) |
| BMI (≥30 kg/m2) ( | 0.2 (−1.3, 1.6) | −0.0 (−1.5, 1.5) | 0.2 (−1.8, 2.1) | 0.5 (−1.5, 2.5) |
Model 1: no covariates were adjusted. Model 2: age and race were adjusted. Model 3: model 2 plus BMI were adjusted. Model 4: model 3 plus education level, income–poverty ratio, moderate recreational activities, smoked at least 100 cigarettes in life, diabetes status, blood urea nitrogen, total protein, serum uric acid, serum phosphorus, and serum calcium were adjusted.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 2Association between waist circumference and lumbar bone mineral density. (A) Each black point represents a sample. (B) Solid rad line represents the smooth curve fit between variables. Blue bands represent the 95% CI from the fit. Age, gender, race, BMI, education level, income–poverty ratio, moderate recreational activities, smoked at least 100 cigarettes in life, diabetes status, blood urea nitrogen, total protein, serum uric acid, serum phosphorus, and serum calcium were adjusted.
Figure 3Association between waist circumference and lumbar bone mineral density, stratified by gender. Age, race, BMI, education level, income–poverty ratio, moderate recreational activities, smoked at least 100 cigarettes in life, diabetes status, blood urea nitrogen, total protein, serum uric acid, serum phosphorus, and serum calcium were adjusted.
Threshold effect analysis of waist circumference (cm) on lumbar bone mineral density (mg/cm2) in premenopausal women using two-piecewise linear regression model.
| Lumbar bone mineral density | Adjusted β (95% CI) |
|---|---|
| Premenopausal women | |
| Fitting by standard linear model | −2.6 (−4.1, −1.1) |
| Fitting by two-piecewise linear model | |
| Inflection point | 80 |
| Waist circumference <80 (cm) | 2.4 (−2.7, 7.4) |
| waist circumference >80 (cm) | −3.1 (4.7, −1.5) |
| Log likelihood ratio | 0.041 |
Age, race, BMI, education level, income–poverty ratio, moderate recreational activities, smoked at least 100 cigarettes in life, diabetes status, blood urea nitrogen, total protein, serum uric acid, serum phosphorus, and serum calcium were adjusted.