Robert Koucheki1,2,3, Martin Koyle1,4, George M Ibrahim1,5, Jeremie Nallet3, David E Lebel6,7. 1. Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. 4. Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. 5. Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. 6. Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. david.lebel@sickkids.ca. 7. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. david.lebel@sickkids.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The objective of this meta-analysis and systematic review is to compare the methodology and evaluate the efficacy of Enhanced recovery after Spine Surgery (ERAS) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to compare the outcomes with traditional discharge (TD) pathways. METHODS: Using major databases, a systematic search was performed. Studies comparing the implementation of ERAS or ERAS-like and TD pathways in patients with AIS were identified. Data regarding methodology and outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (n = 2456) were included, comprising 1081 TD and 1375 ERAS or ERAS-like patients. Average age of patients was 14.6 ± 0.4 years. Surgical duration was on average 35.6 min shorter for the ERAS group compared to TD cohort ([2.8, 68.3], p = 0.03), and blood loss was 112.3 milliliters less ([102.4, 122.2], p < 0.00001). ERAS group reached first ambulation 29.6 h earlier ([11.2, 48.0], p-0.002), patient-controlled-analgesia (PCA) discontinuation 0.53 day earlier ([0.4, 0.6], p < 0.00001), urinary catheter discontinuation 0.5 day earlier ([0.4, 0.6], p < 0.00001), and length-of-stay (LOS) was 1.6 days shorter ([1.4, 1.8], p < 0.00001). Rates of complications and 30-day-readmission-to-hospital were similar between both groups. Pain scores were significantly lower for ERAS group on days 0 through 2 post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: Use of ERAS after AIS is safe and effective, decreasing surgical duration and blood loss. ERAS methodology effectively focused on reducing time to first ambulation, PCA discontinuation, and urinary catheter removal. Outcomes showed significantly decreased LOS without a significant increase in complications. There should be efforts to incorporate ERAS in AIS surgery. Further studies are necessary to assess patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies.
PURPOSE: The objective of this meta-analysis and systematic review is to compare the methodology and evaluate the efficacy of Enhanced recovery after Spine Surgery (ERAS) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to compare the outcomes with traditional discharge (TD) pathways. METHODS: Using major databases, a systematic search was performed. Studies comparing the implementation of ERAS or ERAS-like and TD pathways in patients with AIS were identified. Data regarding methodology and outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (n = 2456) were included, comprising 1081 TD and 1375 ERAS or ERAS-like patients. Average age of patients was 14.6 ± 0.4 years. Surgical duration was on average 35.6 min shorter for the ERAS group compared to TD cohort ([2.8, 68.3], p = 0.03), and blood loss was 112.3 milliliters less ([102.4, 122.2], p < 0.00001). ERAS group reached first ambulation 29.6 h earlier ([11.2, 48.0], p-0.002), patient-controlled-analgesia (PCA) discontinuation 0.53 day earlier ([0.4, 0.6], p < 0.00001), urinary catheter discontinuation 0.5 day earlier ([0.4, 0.6], p < 0.00001), and length-of-stay (LOS) was 1.6 days shorter ([1.4, 1.8], p < 0.00001). Rates of complications and 30-day-readmission-to-hospital were similar between both groups. Pain scores were significantly lower for ERAS group on days 0 through 2 post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: Use of ERAS after AIS is safe and effective, decreasing surgical duration and blood loss. ERAS methodology effectively focused on reducing time to first ambulation, PCA discontinuation, and urinary catheter removal. Outcomes showed significantly decreased LOS without a significant increase in complications. There should be efforts to incorporate ERAS in AIS surgery. Further studies are necessary to assess patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies.
Authors: Massimiliano Greco; Giovanni Capretti; Luigi Beretta; Marco Gemma; Nicolò Pecorelli; Marco Braga Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Nicholas D Fletcher; Lindsay M Andras; David E Lazarus; Robert J Owen; Benjamin J Geddes; Jessica Cao; David L Skaggs; Timothy S Oswald; Robert W Bruce Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.324
Authors: Matthew J Page; Joanne E McKenzie; Patrick M Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Tammy C Hoffmann; Cynthia D Mulrow; Larissa Shamseer; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Elie A Akl; Sue E Brennan; Roger Chou; Julie Glanville; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Manoj M Lalu; Tianjing Li; Elizabeth W Loder; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Steve McDonald; Luke A McGuinness; Lesley A Stewart; James Thomas; Andrea C Tricco; Vivian A Welch; Penny Whiting; David Moher Journal: BMJ Date: 2021-03-29
Authors: Robert Young; Ethan Cottrill; Zach Pennington; Jeff Ehresman; A Karim Ahmed; Timothy Kim; Bowen Jiang; Daniel Lubelski; Alex M Zhu; Katherine S Wright; Donna Gavin; Alyson Russo; Marie N Hanna; Ali Bydon; Timothy F Witham; Corinna Zygourakis; Nicholas Theodore Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2020-12-25
Authors: Nicholas D Fletcher; Nader Shourbaji; Phillip M Mitchell; Timothy S Oswald; Dennis P Devito; Robert W Bruce Journal: J Child Orthop Date: 2014-04-27 Impact factor: 1.548