Literature DB >> 34524020

Relationship Between Time-in-Range, HbA1c, and the Glucose Management Indicator in Pregnancies Complicated by Type 1 Diabetes.

Viral N Shah1, Janet K Snell-Bergeon1, Jamie K Demmitt1, Prakriti Joshee1, Rachel Garcetti1, Laura Pyle1,2, Sarit Polsky1.   

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate relationships between time-in-range (TIR 63-140 mg/dL), glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, and the glucose management indicator (GMI) in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Research Design and
Methods: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from 27 women with type 1 diabetes were collected prospectively throughout pregnancy. Up to 90-days of CGM data were correlated with point-of-care HbA1c levels measured in the clinic at each trimester. GMI levels were calculated using a published regression formula. Liner models were used to compare TIR, HbA1c, and GMI by each trimester.
Results: There was a significant negative correlation between TIR and HbA1c; each 10% increase in TIR was associated with a 0.3% reduction in HbA1c. The correlation between TIR and HbA1c was stronger (r = -0.8) during the second and third trimesters than during the first trimester (r = -0.4). There was good correlation between TIR and GMI during each trimester (r = 0.9 for each trimester). The relationship between GMI and HbA1c especially during second (r = 0.8) and third trimesters (r = 0.8) was strong.
Conclusion: In the first trimester, the correlation between HbA1c level and TIR was relatively small, while that of TIR and GMI was very strong, thus GMI may better reflect glycemic control than HbA1c in early pregnancy. Each 10% increase in TIR was associated with a 0.3% reduction in HbA1c throughout pregnancy, which was lower than other published studies in nonpregnant populations reporting a 0.5%-0.8% reduction in HbA1c. Further studies are needed to understand the relationship between TIR and GMI and how GMI may affect maternal and fetal complications. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02556554.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous glucose monitoring; Glucose management indicator; Pregnancy; Time in range; Type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34524020      PMCID: PMC9009593          DOI: 10.1089/dia.2021.0093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  29 in total

1.  HbA1c levels are significantly lower in early and late pregnancy.

Authors:  Lene R Nielsen; Pia Ekbom; Peter Damm; Charlotte Glümer; Merete M Frandsen; Dorte M Jensen; Elisabeth R Mathiesen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Non-glycemic-dependent reduction of late pregnancy A1C levels in women with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Lucrecia Herranz; Lourdes Saez-de-Ibarra; Cristina Grande; Luis F Pallardo
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Day-and-Night Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in a Broad Population of Pregnant Women With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Zoe A Stewart; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Sara Hartnell; Leanne K O'Neil; Gerry Rayman; Eleanor M Scott; Katharine Barnard; Conor Farrington; Roman Hovorka; Helen R Murphy
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 4.  14. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Translating HbA1c measurements into estimated average glucose values in pregnant women with diabetes.

Authors:  Graham R Law; Mark S Gilthorpe; Anna L Secher; Rosemary Temple; Rudolf Bilous; Elisabeth R Mathiesen; Helen R Murphy; Eleanor M Scott
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Exploratory Analysis of Glycemic Control and Variability Over Gestation Among Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Elizabeth O Buschur; Kristen Campbell; Laura Pyle; Rachel Garcetti; Prakriti Joshee; Jamie K Demmitt; Janet K Snell-Bergeon; Sarit Polsky
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Selecting an A1C Point-of-Care Instrument.

Authors:  Heather P Whitley; Ee Vonn Yong; Casey Rasinen
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2015-08

8.  Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT): a multicentre international randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Denice S Feig; Lois E Donovan; Rosa Corcoy; Kellie E Murphy; Stephanie A Amiel; Katharine F Hunt; Elizabeth Asztalos; Jon F R Barrett; J Johanna Sanchez; Alberto de Leiva; Moshe Hod; Lois Jovanovic; Erin Keely; Ruth McManus; Eileen K Hutton; Claire L Meek; Zoe A Stewart; Tim Wysocki; Robert O'Brien; Katrina Ruedy; Craig Kollman; George Tomlinson; Helen R Murphy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Continuous glucose monitor use with and without remote monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: A pilot study.

Authors:  Sarit Polsky; Rachel Garcetti; Laura Pyle; Prakriti Joshee; Jamie K Demmitt; Janet K Snell-Bergeon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Diabetes and pregnancy: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Ian Blumer; Eran Hadar; David R Hadden; Lois Jovanovič; Jorge H Mestman; M Hassan Murad; Yariv Yogev
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  1 in total

1.  Addition of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring to standard care in a cohort of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: effect on glycaemic control and pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Verónica Perea; Maria José Picón; Ana Megia; Maria Goya; Ana Maria Wägner; Begoña Vega; Nuria Seguí; Maria Dolores Montañez; Irene Vinagre
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 10.460

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.