Objective: We aimed to evaluate relationships between time-in-range (TIR 63-140 mg/dL), glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, and the glucose management indicator (GMI) in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Research Design and Methods: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from 27 women with type 1 diabetes were collected prospectively throughout pregnancy. Up to 90-days of CGM data were correlated with point-of-care HbA1c levels measured in the clinic at each trimester. GMI levels were calculated using a published regression formula. Liner models were used to compare TIR, HbA1c, and GMI by each trimester. Results: There was a significant negative correlation between TIR and HbA1c; each 10% increase in TIR was associated with a 0.3% reduction in HbA1c. The correlation between TIR and HbA1c was stronger (r = -0.8) during the second and third trimesters than during the first trimester (r = -0.4). There was good correlation between TIR and GMI during each trimester (r = 0.9 for each trimester). The relationship between GMI and HbA1c especially during second (r = 0.8) and third trimesters (r = 0.8) was strong. Conclusion: In the first trimester, the correlation between HbA1c level and TIR was relatively small, while that of TIR and GMI was very strong, thus GMI may better reflect glycemic control than HbA1c in early pregnancy. Each 10% increase in TIR was associated with a 0.3% reduction in HbA1c throughout pregnancy, which was lower than other published studies in nonpregnant populations reporting a 0.5%-0.8% reduction in HbA1c. Further studies are needed to understand the relationship between TIR and GMI and how GMI may affect maternal and fetal complications. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02556554.
Objective: We aimed to evaluate relationships between time-in-range (TIR 63-140 mg/dL), glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, and the glucose management indicator (GMI) in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Research Design and Methods: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from 27 women with type 1 diabetes were collected prospectively throughout pregnancy. Up to 90-days of CGM data were correlated with point-of-care HbA1c levels measured in the clinic at each trimester. GMI levels were calculated using a published regression formula. Liner models were used to compare TIR, HbA1c, and GMI by each trimester. Results: There was a significant negative correlation between TIR and HbA1c; each 10% increase in TIR was associated with a 0.3% reduction in HbA1c. The correlation between TIR and HbA1c was stronger (r = -0.8) during the second and third trimesters than during the first trimester (r = -0.4). There was good correlation between TIR and GMI during each trimester (r = 0.9 for each trimester). The relationship between GMI and HbA1c especially during second (r = 0.8) and third trimesters (r = 0.8) was strong. Conclusion: In the first trimester, the correlation between HbA1c level and TIR was relatively small, while that of TIR and GMI was very strong, thus GMI may better reflect glycemic control than HbA1c in early pregnancy. Each 10% increase in TIR was associated with a 0.3% reduction in HbA1c throughout pregnancy, which was lower than other published studies in nonpregnant populations reporting a 0.5%-0.8% reduction in HbA1c. Further studies are needed to understand the relationship between TIR and GMI and how GMI may affect maternal and fetal complications. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02556554.
Entities:
Keywords:
Continuous glucose monitoring; Glucose management indicator; Pregnancy; Time in range; Type 1 diabetes
Authors: Lene R Nielsen; Pia Ekbom; Peter Damm; Charlotte Glümer; Merete M Frandsen; Dorte M Jensen; Elisabeth R Mathiesen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Zoe A Stewart; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Sara Hartnell; Leanne K O'Neil; Gerry Rayman; Eleanor M Scott; Katharine Barnard; Conor Farrington; Roman Hovorka; Helen R Murphy Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Graham R Law; Mark S Gilthorpe; Anna L Secher; Rosemary Temple; Rudolf Bilous; Elisabeth R Mathiesen; Helen R Murphy; Eleanor M Scott Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Elizabeth O Buschur; Kristen Campbell; Laura Pyle; Rachel Garcetti; Prakriti Joshee; Jamie K Demmitt; Janet K Snell-Bergeon; Sarit Polsky Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2021-11 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Denice S Feig; Lois E Donovan; Rosa Corcoy; Kellie E Murphy; Stephanie A Amiel; Katharine F Hunt; Elizabeth Asztalos; Jon F R Barrett; J Johanna Sanchez; Alberto de Leiva; Moshe Hod; Lois Jovanovic; Erin Keely; Ruth McManus; Eileen K Hutton; Claire L Meek; Zoe A Stewart; Tim Wysocki; Robert O'Brien; Katrina Ruedy; Craig Kollman; George Tomlinson; Helen R Murphy Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ian Blumer; Eran Hadar; David R Hadden; Lois Jovanovič; Jorge H Mestman; M Hassan Murad; Yariv Yogev Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Verónica Perea; Maria José Picón; Ana Megia; Maria Goya; Ana Maria Wägner; Begoña Vega; Nuria Seguí; Maria Dolores Montañez; Irene Vinagre Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 10.460