Literature DB >> 34521225

Prospective evaluation of optical coherence tomography for disease detection in the Casey mobile eye clinic.

Ou Tan1, Aiyin Chen1, Yan Li1, Steven Bailey1, Thomas S Hwang1, Andreas K Lauer1, Michael F Chiang1, David Huang1.   

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate iVue Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) effectiveness in screening for eye disease compared to clinical examination. Subjects were recruited from the Casey Eye Community Outreach Program Mobile Clinic during its routinely scheduled outreach clinics to indigent, underserved populations throughout Oregon. Macular optical coherence tomography interpretation and automated optical coherence tomography analysis were compared to the clinical examination, with specific attention to findings indicative of retinal abnormalities, risks for glaucoma, and narrow angles. As a result, a total of 114 subjects were included in this study. In diabetics, optical coherence tomography and clinical exam were in fair agreement (kappa = 0.39), with 22% of eyes having abnormal findings on macular optical coherence tomography and 26% of eyes having diabetic retinopathy or diabetic macular edema on fundus exam. In non-diabetics, optical coherence tomography and clinical exam were in fair agreement (kappa = 0.28), with 11% of eyes having abnormal findings on macular optical coherence tomography and 9% on fundus exam. Using optical coherence tomography ganglion cell complex and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis, 18% of eyes were found to be glaucoma suspects, whereas clinical exam of cup-to-disc ratio detected 8% and intraocular pressure 5%. Agreements between optical coherence tomography and other methods were poor (kappa < 0.11) for glaucoma suspect. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography of the angle found 8% of eyes to have occludable angles, whereas slit lamp and gonioscopy found 5% of eyes to have narrow angles, with moderate agreement (kappa = 0.57). In summary, optical coherence tomography detected additional retinal abnormalities, glaucoma suspects, and narrow angles compared to clinical exam alone and may serve as a useful adjunct to the clinical exam in screening for eye disease in a low-risk, medically underserved, ethnically diverse population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Screen; diabetes; glaucoma; narrow angle; optical coherence tomography; retinopathy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34521225      PMCID: PMC8718254          DOI: 10.1177/15353702211037262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)        ISSN: 1535-3699


  28 in total

1.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Three-dimensional eye motion correction by Lissajous scan optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yiwei Chen; Young-Joo Hong; Shuichi Makita; Yoshiaki Yasuno
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Evaluation of artifact reduction in optical coherence tomography angiography with real-time tracking and motion correction technology.

Authors:  Acner Camino; Miao Zhang; Simon S Gao; Thomas S Hwang; Utkarsh Sharma; David J Wilson; David Huang; Yali Jia
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Anterior chamber angle measurements using Schwalbe's line with high-resolution fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Bing Qin; Brian A Francis; Yan Li; Maolong Tang; Xinbo Zhang; Chunhui Jiang; Catherine Cleary; David Huang
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Spectral-Domain OCT: Helping the Clinician Diagnose Glaucoma: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors:  Teresa C Chen; Ambika Hoguet; Anna K Junk; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Sunita Radhakrishnan; Hana L Takusagawa; Philip P Chen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Are we making good use of our public resources? The false-positive rate of screening by fundus photography for diabetic macular oedema.

Authors:  R Lm Wong; C W Tsang; D Sh Wong; S McGhee; C H Lam; J Lian; J Wy Lee; J Sm Lai; V Chong; I Yh Wong
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.227

7.  Visual Impairment and Blindness in Adults in the United States: Demographic and Geographic Variations From 2015 to 2050.

Authors:  Rohit Varma; Thasarat S Vajaranant; Bruce Burkemper; Shuang Wu; Mina Torres; Chunyi Hsu; Farzana Choudhury; Roberta McKean-Cowdin
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Technologies for Glaucoma Case-Finding in a Community Setting.

Authors:  Priya L Dabasia; Bruno R Fidalgo; David F Edgar; David F Garway-Heath; John G Lawrenson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Use of Optical Coherence Tomography by Nonexpert Personnel as a Screening Approach for Glaucoma.

Authors:  Melissa M Liu; Chris Cho; Joan L Jefferys; Harry A Quigley; Adrienne W Scott
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Motion correction in optical coherence tomography volumes on a per A-scan basis using orthogonal scan patterns.

Authors:  Martin F Kraus; Benjamin Potsaid; Markus A Mayer; Ruediger Bock; Bernhard Baumann; Jonathan J Liu; Joachim Hornegger; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  1 in total

1.  Emerging imaging developments in experimental vision sciences and ophthalmology.

Authors:  Shuliang Jiao; Yali Jia; Xincheng Yao
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2021-08-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.