Akbar Alipour1,2, Akila N Viswanathan3, Ronald D Watkins4, Hassan Elahi1, Wolfgang Loew5, Eric Meyer1, Marc Morcos3, Henry R Halperin1, Ehud J Schmidt1,3. 1. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop an endovaginal MRI array that provides signal enhancement forward into the posterior parametrium and sideways into the vaginal wall, accelerating multiple-contrast detection of residual tumors that survive external beam radiation. The array's enclosure should form an obturator for cervical cancer brachytherapy, allowing integration with MRI-guided catheter placement, CT, and interstitial radiation dose delivery. METHODS: The endovaginal array consisted of forward-looking and sideways-looking components. The forward-looking element imaged the cervix and posterior endometrium, and the sideways-looking elements imaged the vaginal wall. Electromagnetic simulation was performed to optimize the geometry of a forward-looking coil placed on a conductive-metallic substrate, extending the forward penetration above the coil's tip. Thereafter, an endovaginal array with one forward-looking coil and four sideways-looking elements was constructed and tested at 1.5 Tesla in saline and gel phantoms, and three sexually mature swine. Each coil's tuning, matching, and decoupling were optimized theoretically, implemented with electronic circuits, and validated with network-analyzer measurements. The array enclosure emulates a conventional brachytherapy obturator, allowing use of the internal imaging array together with tandem coils and interstitial catheters, as well as use of the enclosure alone during CT and radiation delivery. To evaluate the receive magnetic field ( B 1 - ) spatial profile, the endovaginal array's specific absorption-rate (SAR) distribution was simulated inside a gel ASTM phantom to determine extreme heating locations in advance of a heating test. Heating tests were then performed during high SAR imaging in a gel phantom at the predetermined locations, testing compliance with MRI safety standards. To assess array imaging performance, signal-to-noise-ratios (SNR) were calculated in a saline phantom and in vivo. Swine images were acquired with the endovaginal array combined with the scanner's body and spine arrays. RESULTS: Simulated B 1 - profiles for the forward-looking lobe pattern, obtained while varying several geometric parameters, disclosed that a forward-looking coil placed on a metal-backed substrate could double the effective forward penetration from approximately 25 to ∼40 mm. An endovaginal array, enclosed in an obturator enclosure was then constructed, with all coils tuned, matched, and decoupled. The ASTM gel-phantom SAR test showed that peak local SAR was 1.2 W/kg in the forward-looking coil and 0.3 W/kg in the sideways-looking elements, well within ASTM/FDA/IEC guidelines. A 15-min 4 W/kg average SAR imaging experiment resulted in less than 2o C temperature increase, also within ASTM/FDA/IEC heating limits. In a saline phantom, the forward-looking coil and sideways-looking array's SNR was four to eight times, over a 20-30 mm field-of-view (FOV), and five to eight times, over a 15-25 mm FOV, relative to the spine array's SNR, respectively. In three sexually mature swine, the forward-looking coil provided a 5 + 0.2 SNR enhancement factor within the cervix and posterior endometrium, and the sideways-looking array provided a 4 + 0.2 SNR gain factor in the vaginal wall, relative to the Siemens spine array, demonstrating that the array could significantly reduce imaging time. CONCLUSIONS: Higher SNR gynecological imaging is supported by forward-looking and sideways-looking coils. A forward-looking endovaginal coil for cervix and parametrium imaging was built with optimized metal backing. Array placement within an obturator enhanced integration with the brachytherapy procedure and accelerated imaging for detecting postexternal-beam residual tumors.
PURPOSE: To develop an endovaginal MRI array that provides signal enhancement forward into the posterior parametrium and sideways into the vaginal wall, accelerating multiple-contrast detection of residual tumors that survive external beam radiation. The array's enclosure should form an obturator for cervical cancer brachytherapy, allowing integration with MRI-guided catheter placement, CT, and interstitial radiation dose delivery. METHODS: The endovaginal array consisted of forward-looking and sideways-looking components. The forward-looking element imaged the cervix and posterior endometrium, and the sideways-looking elements imaged the vaginal wall. Electromagnetic simulation was performed to optimize the geometry of a forward-looking coil placed on a conductive-metallic substrate, extending the forward penetration above the coil's tip. Thereafter, an endovaginal array with one forward-looking coil and four sideways-looking elements was constructed and tested at 1.5 Tesla in saline and gel phantoms, and three sexually mature swine. Each coil's tuning, matching, and decoupling were optimized theoretically, implemented with electronic circuits, and validated with network-analyzer measurements. The array enclosure emulates a conventional brachytherapy obturator, allowing use of the internal imaging array together with tandem coils and interstitial catheters, as well as use of the enclosure alone during CT and radiation delivery. To evaluate the receive magnetic field ( B 1 - ) spatial profile, the endovaginal array's specific absorption-rate (SAR) distribution was simulated inside a gel ASTM phantom to determine extreme heating locations in advance of a heating test. Heating tests were then performed during high SAR imaging in a gel phantom at the predetermined locations, testing compliance with MRI safety standards. To assess array imaging performance, signal-to-noise-ratios (SNR) were calculated in a saline phantom and in vivo. Swine images were acquired with the endovaginal array combined with the scanner's body and spine arrays. RESULTS: Simulated B 1 - profiles for the forward-looking lobe pattern, obtained while varying several geometric parameters, disclosed that a forward-looking coil placed on a metal-backed substrate could double the effective forward penetration from approximately 25 to ∼40 mm. An endovaginal array, enclosed in an obturator enclosure was then constructed, with all coils tuned, matched, and decoupled. The ASTM gel-phantom SAR test showed that peak local SAR was 1.2 W/kg in the forward-looking coil and 0.3 W/kg in the sideways-looking elements, well within ASTM/FDA/IEC guidelines. A 15-min 4 W/kg average SAR imaging experiment resulted in less than 2o C temperature increase, also within ASTM/FDA/IEC heating limits. In a saline phantom, the forward-looking coil and sideways-looking array's SNR was four to eight times, over a 20-30 mm field-of-view (FOV), and five to eight times, over a 15-25 mm FOV, relative to the spine array's SNR, respectively. In three sexually mature swine, the forward-looking coil provided a 5 + 0.2 SNR enhancement factor within the cervix and posterior endometrium, and the sideways-looking array provided a 4 + 0.2 SNR gain factor in the vaginal wall, relative to the Siemens spine array, demonstrating that the array could significantly reduce imaging time. CONCLUSIONS: Higher SNR gynecological imaging is supported by forward-looking and sideways-looking coils. A forward-looking endovaginal coil for cervix and parametrium imaging was built with optimized metal backing. Array placement within an obturator enhanced integration with the brachytherapy procedure and accelerated imaging for detecting postexternal-beam residual tumors.
Authors: Jian Z Wang; Nina A Mayr; Dongqing Zhang; Kaile Li; John C Grecula; Joseph F Montebello; Simon S Lo; William T C Yuh Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Roberta Anderson; Elwood Armour; Courtney Beeckler; Valerie Briner; Amanda Choflet; Andrea Cox; Amanda N Fader; Marie N Hannah; Robert Hobbs; Ellen Huang; Marilyn Kiely; Junghoon Lee; Marc Morcos; Paige E McMillan; Dave Miller; Sook Kien Ng; Rashmi Prasad; Annette Souranis; Robert Thomsen; Theodore L DeWeese; Akila N Viswanathan Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Philip M Robson; Aaron K Grant; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Riccardo Lattanzi; Daniel K Sodickson; Charles A McKenzie Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Junzo Chino; Christina M Annunziata; Sushil Beriwal; Lisa Bradfield; Beth A Erickson; Emma C Fields; KathrynJane Fitch; Matthew M Harkenrider; Christine H Holschneider; Mitchell Kamrava; Eric Leung; Lilie L Lin; Jyoti S Mayadev; Marc Morcos; Chika Nwachukwu; Daniel Petereit; Akila N Viswanathan Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-05-18
Authors: Christina Fitzmaurice; Tomi F Akinyemiju; Faris Hasan Al Lami; Tahiya Alam; Reza Alizadeh-Navaei; Christine Allen; Ubai Alsharif; Nelson Alvis-Guzman; Erfan Amini; Benjamin O Anderson; Olatunde Aremu; Al Artaman; Solomon Weldegebreal Asgedom; Reza Assadi; Tesfay Mehari Atey; Leticia Avila-Burgos; Ashish Awasthi; Huda Omer Ba Saleem; Aleksandra Barac; James R Bennett; Isabela M Bensenor; Nickhill Bhakta; Hermann Brenner; Lucero Cahuana-Hurtado; Carlos A Castañeda-Orjuela; Ferrán Catalá-López; Jee-Young Jasmine Choi; Devasahayam Jesudas Christopher; Sheng-Chia Chung; Maria Paula Curado; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; José das Neves; Subhojit Dey; Samath D Dharmaratne; David Teye Doku; Tim R Driscoll; Manisha Dubey; Hedyeh Ebrahimi; Dumessa Edessa; Ziad El-Khatib; Aman Yesuf Endries; Florian Fischer; Lisa M Force; Kyle J Foreman; Solomon Weldemariam Gebrehiwot; Sameer Vali Gopalani; Giuseppe Grosso; Rahul Gupta; Bishal Gyawali; Randah Ribhi Hamadeh; Samer Hamidi; James Harvey; Hamid Yimam Hassen; Roderick J Hay; Simon I Hay; Behzad Heibati; Molla Kahssay Hiluf; Nobuyuki Horita; H Dean Hosgood; Olayinka S Ilesanmi; Kaire Innos; Farhad Islami; Mihajlo B Jakovljevic; Sarah Charlotte Johnson; Jost B Jonas; Amir Kasaeian; Tesfaye Dessale Kassa; Yousef Saleh Khader; Ejaz Ahmad Khan; Gulfaraz Khan; Young-Ho Khang; Mohammad Hossein Khosravi; Jagdish Khubchandani; Jacek A Kopec; G Anil Kumar; Michael Kutz; Deepesh Pravinkumar Lad; Alessandra Lafranconi; Qing Lan; Yirga Legesse; James Leigh; Shai Linn; Raimundas Lunevicius; Azeem Majeed; Reza Malekzadeh; Deborah Carvalho Malta; Lorenzo G Mantovani; Brian J McMahon; Toni Meier; Yohannes Adama Melaku; Mulugeta Melku; Peter Memiah; Walter Mendoza; Tuomo J Meretoja; Haftay Berhane Mezgebe; Ted R Miller; Shafiu Mohammed; Ali H Mokdad; Mahmood Moosazadeh; Paula Moraga; Seyyed Meysam Mousavi; Vinay Nangia; Cuong Tat Nguyen; Vuong Minh Nong; Felix Akpojene Ogbo; Andrew Toyin Olagunju; Mahesh Pa; Eun-Kee Park; Tejas Patel; David M Pereira; Farhad Pishgar; Maarten J Postma; Farshad Pourmalek; Mostafa Qorbani; Anwar Rafay; Salman Rawaf; David Laith Rawaf; Gholamreza Roshandel; Saeid Safiri; Hamideh Salimzadeh; Juan Ramon Sanabria; Milena M Santric Milicevic; Benn Sartorius; Maheswar Satpathy; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Katya Anne Shackelford; Masood Ali Shaikh; Mahdi Sharif-Alhoseini; Jun She; Min-Jeong Shin; Ivy Shiue; Mark G Shrime; Abiy Hiruye Sinke; Mekonnen Sisay; Amber Sligar; Muawiyyah Babale Sufiyan; Bryan L Sykes; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Gizachew Assefa Tessema; Roman Topor-Madry; Tung Thanh Tran; Bach Xuan Tran; Kingsley Nnanna Ukwaja; Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov; Stein Emil Vollset; Elisabete Weiderpass; Hywel C Williams; Nigus Bililign Yimer; Naohiro Yonemoto; Mustafa Z Younis; Christopher J L Murray; Mohsen Naghavi Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: David S Wishart; Leo L Cheng; Valérie Copié; Arthur S Edison; Hamid R Eghbalnia; Jeffrey C Hoch; Goncalo J Gouveia; Wimal Pathmasiri; Robert Powers; Tracey B Schock; Lloyd W Sumner; Mario Uchimiya Journal: Metabolites Date: 2022-07-23