Literature DB >> 34519770

Safety and Antibody Response After 1 and 2 Doses of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant.

Amandine Le Bourgeois1, Marianne Coste-Burel2, Thierry Guillaume1,3, Pierre Peterlin1, Alice Garnier1, Marie C Béné3,4, Patrice Chevallier1,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34519770      PMCID: PMC8441592          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

COVID-19, which is due to infection with SARS-CoV-2, results in poor outcomes in patients with hematologic cancers (approximately 40% mortality rate).[1,2] The efficacy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines has been successfully demonstrated in healthy populations[3] and also has been reported in immunocompromised patients. Recently, we showed that a first injection of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine induced an antibody response in 55% of 112 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.[4] Here, we document the antibody response to a second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in an extended cohort of 117 patients.

Methods

This single-center cohort study enrolled allogeneic HSCT recipients with no clinical history of COVID-19 and no active graft-vs-host disease more than 3 months after transplant. Vaccination was performed in our department between January 20 and April 17, 2021. All participants provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by Nantes University Hospital review board. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Previous asymptomatic COVID-19 infection was investigated before the first vaccine injection by testing for antinucleocapsid antibodies (anti–SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay; Roche Elecsys). Antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor–binding domain (Elecsys anti–SARS-CoV-2-S) were tested twice, at the time of the second injection and approximately 1 month after the second injection. As recommended by the manufacturer, titers greater than or equal to 0.8 U/mL were considered positive, with the highest value being greater than 250 U/mL. Associations between clinical characteristics and antibody responses were investigated using 1-sided χ2 and Wilcoxon tests with R statistical software version 4.0.2 (R Project for Statistical Computing) via BiostaTGV. P < .05 was considered significant.

Results

Previous asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was documented in 4 of 121 enrolled patients, who were, therefore, excluded from the study. They were vaccinated twice, and all reached specific IgG titers greater than 250 U/mL after the second dose. Characteristics of the 117 allogeneic HSCT recipients retained (median [range] age, 57 [20-75] years; 70 men [60%]) are provided in the Table. The median (range) interval between the first and the second dose was 22 (16-37) days. At the time of the second injection, 63 patients (54%) had a positive anti-spike antibody response. The median IgG titer for responders was 15.8 U/mL and ranged from 0.9 U/mL to more than 250 U/mL, with the latter occurring in 4 patients (3%). The second antibody testing was performed at a median (range) interval of 35 (18-77) days after the second dose and was positive in 97 patients (83%), with IgG titers ranging from 0.9 U/mL to greater than 250 U/mL; 72 (62%) patients reached the highest IgG titer. Factors associated with the absence of response were a haplotransplant, recent (<1 year) HSCT (Figure), lymphopenia (<1000 cells/μL; to convert lymphocyte count to cells × 109/L, multiply by 0.001), and receipt of immunosuppressive treatment or chemotherapy at the time of vaccination (Table).
Table.

Patient Characteristics and Results of Serological Tests After Dose 1 and Dose 2

CharacteristicsTotal, participants, No. (%) (N = 117)Antibody response after 1 dose, No. (%) (n = 63)P valueAntibody response after 2 doses, No. (%) (n = 97)P value
Age, y
Median (range)57 (20-75)NA.30NA.47
<4017 (14)11 (65)16 (94)
40-5950 (43)29 (58)41 (82)
≥6050 (43)23 (46)40 (80)
Sex
Male70 (60)34 (49).2256 (80).44
Female47 (40)29 (62)41 (87)
Time from transplant to vaccination, mo
Median (range), d654 (91-6198)NANA
<1229 (25)4 (14).00115 (52)<.001
12-2436 (31)18 (50)32 (89)
>2452 (44)41 (79)50 (96)
Underlying diseasea
Myeloid77 (68)40 (52).8773 (95).93
Lymphoid36 (32)20 (55)30 (83)
Donor type
Genoidentical30 (25.5)16 (53).4626 (87).03
Matched unrelated donor49 (42)28 (57)44 (90)
Haploidentical36 (31)17 (47)25 (69)
Mismatched unrelated donor (9/10 human leukocyte antigens)2 (2)2 (100)2 (100)
Conditioning
Myeloablative23 (20)15 (65).4422 (96).36
Reduced intensity87 (74)44 (56)70 (80)
Sequential7 (6)4 (57)5 (71)
Previous graft-vs-host disease
Yes62 (53)32 (51).7451 (82).87
No55 (47)31 (57)46 (84)
Ongoing treatmentb
No85 (73)53 (62).00577 (915)<.001c
Yes32 (27)10 (31)20 (63)
Corticosteroidsd13NANANANA
Ruxolitinib3NANA
Ciclosporin A10NANA
Chemotherapy6NANA
Lymphocyte count at vaccination
Median (range), cells/μL1400 (150-9880)NA<.001NA<.001
<1000 cell/μL (n = 36)36 (31)9 (25)23 (64)
≥1000 cells/μL (n = 81)81 (69)54 (67)74 (91)

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

SI conversion factor: To convert lymphocyte count to cells × 109/L, multiply by 0.001.

Includes acute myeloblastic leukemia (37 patients), myelodysplastic syndrome (22 patients), myelofibrosis (8 patients), myelodysplastic syndrome and myelofibrosis (5 patients), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (4 patients), blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (1 patient), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (20 patients), Hodgkin lymphoma (4 patients), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (11 patients), multiple myeloma (1 patient), nonlymphoid and nonmyeloid aplastic anemia (3 patients), and porphyria (1 patient).

Includes immunosuppressive drugs or chemotherapy for relapse or relapse prevention.

P value compares genoidentical, matched unrelated, and haploidentical donors.

Refers to corticosteroids used alone or in combination (ruxolitinib, cyclosporin A, and mycophenolate mofetyl).

Figure.

Anti–SARS-CoV-2 Titers After the First and Second Vaccine Injections

Box plots show anti–SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor titers after the first and the second vaccine injections. Lines within boxes denote medians, error bars denote 95% CIs, circles denote data for individual patients. Comparisons are between patients for whom follow-up after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant was less than 1 year vs between 1 and 2 years vs more than 2 years.

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable. SI conversion factor: To convert lymphocyte count to cells × 109/L, multiply by 0.001. Includes acute myeloblastic leukemia (37 patients), myelodysplastic syndrome (22 patients), myelofibrosis (8 patients), myelodysplastic syndrome and myelofibrosis (5 patients), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (4 patients), blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (1 patient), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (20 patients), Hodgkin lymphoma (4 patients), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (11 patients), multiple myeloma (1 patient), nonlymphoid and nonmyeloid aplastic anemia (3 patients), and porphyria (1 patient). Includes immunosuppressive drugs or chemotherapy for relapse or relapse prevention. P value compares genoidentical, matched unrelated, and haploidentical donors. Refers to corticosteroids used alone or in combination (ruxolitinib, cyclosporin A, and mycophenolate mofetyl).

Anti–SARS-CoV-2 Titers After the First and Second Vaccine Injections

Box plots show anti–SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor titers after the first and the second vaccine injections. Lines within boxes denote medians, error bars denote 95% CIs, circles denote data for individual patients. Comparisons are between patients for whom follow-up after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant was less than 1 year vs between 1 and 2 years vs more than 2 years. Patients were requested to answer questionnaires for 7 days following dose 1 and dose 2. The responses showed that the 2 vaccine injections were very safe. Only grade 1 or 2 adverse reactions occurred in 51 of 106 patients (48%) after dose 1 and 34 of 87 patients (39%) after dose 2. These rates were comparable to those for a healthy vaccinated population of 25 caregivers from the hematology department of Nantes University Hospital, who all achieved the highest IgG titer after the second dose. Finally, at a median (range) follow-up of 58 (39-98) days, no COVID-19 infection was documented.

Discussion

Despite the limitations inherent to an observational analysis and the fact that the cohort was small and from a single center, this study found a high response rate of 83% in this cohort of allogeneic HSCT recipients after 2 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine. Of note, 62% of the patients achieved the highest IgG titer also reached by a concomitant healthy cohort. This is much more than the 54% rate of seroconversion that has been reported after 2 doses in solid-organ transplant recipients[5] and compares favorably with data obtained in patients treated for solid tumors, for whom a 95% of response rate was obtained after the second dose.[6] This humoral response is, however, only 1 marker of immunity, and allogeneic HSCT recipients will likely have differences in T cell reactivity that should be explored.
  6 in total

1.  Antibody Response to 2-Dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Series in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Brian J Boyarsky; William A Werbel; Robin K Avery; Aaron A R Tobian; Allan B Massie; Dorry L Segev; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Risk factors for a severe form of COVID-19 after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a Société Francophone de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie cellulaire (SFGM-TC) multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Alienor Xhaard; Constance Xhaard; Maud D'Aveni; Helene Salvator; Marie-Laure Chabi; Ana Berceanu; Tereza Coman; Yves Beguin; Yves Chalandon; Xavier Poiré; Michaël Loschi; Catherine Paillard; Benedicte Bruno; Patrice Ceballos; Jean-Hugues Dalle; Karin Bilger; Jacques-Olivier Bay; Marie Robin; Stephanie N'Guyen-Quoc; Marie-Therese Rubio
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  Impaired immunogenicity of BNT162b2 anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients treated for solid tumors.

Authors:  J Barrière; E Chamorey; Z Adjtoutah; O Castelnau; A Mahamat; S Marco; E Petit; A Leysalle; V Raimondi; M Carles
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Safety and immunogenicity of a first dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cells recipients.

Authors:  Patrice Chevallier; Marianne Coste-Burel; Amandine Le Bourgeois; Pierre Peterlin; Alice Garnier; Marie C Béné; Berthe-Marie Imbert; Thomas Drumel; Steven Le Gouill; Philippe Moreau; Beatrice Mahe; Viviane Dubruille; Nicolas Blin; Anne Lok; Cyrille Touzeau; Thomas Gastinne; Maxime Jullien; Sophie Vanthygem; Thierry Guillaume
Journal:  EJHaem       Date:  2021-06-01

5.  Safety and Immunogenicity of Two RNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccine Candidates.

Authors:  Edward E Walsh; Robert W Frenck; Ann R Falsey; Nicholas Kitchin; Judith Absalon; Alejandra Gurtman; Stephen Lockhart; Kathleen Neuzil; Mark J Mulligan; Ruth Bailey; Kena A Swanson; Ping Li; Kenneth Koury; Warren Kalina; David Cooper; Camila Fontes-Garfias; Pei-Yong Shi; Özlem Türeci; Kristin R Tompkins; Kirsten E Lyke; Vanessa Raabe; Philip R Dormitzer; Kathrin U Jansen; Uğur Şahin; William C Gruber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

  6 in total
  22 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of immune response against first and second doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in adult patients with hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Maryam Noori; Shadi Azizi; Farhan Abbasi Varaki; Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi; Davood Bashash
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 5.714

Review 2.  Management of Hematologic Malignancies in the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic: Pathogenetic Mechanisms, Impact of Obesity, Perspectives, and Challenges.

Authors:  Dimitrios Tsilingiris; Narjes Nasiri-Ansari; Nikolaos Spyrou; Faidon Magkos; Maria Dalamaga
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 in Hematological Patients.

Authors:  Niccolò Riccardi; Marco Falcone; Dafna Yahav
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.068

Review 4.  COVID-19 in the Immunocompromised Host, Including People with Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

Authors:  Niyati Jakharia; Aruna K Subramanian; Adrienne E Shapiro
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.905

Review 5.  Coronavirus disease 2019 in immunocompromised patients: a comprehensive review of coronavirus disease 2019 in hematopoietic stem cell recipients.

Authors:  Antoine Lafarge; Asma Mabrouki; Elise Yvin; Swann Bredin; Yannick Binois; Raphael Clere-Jehl; Elie Azoulay
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.687

6.  Interest of a third dose of BNT162b2 anti-SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccine after allotransplant.

Authors:  Amandine Le Bourgeois; Marianne Coste-Burel; Thierry Guillaume; Pierre Peterlin; Alice Garnier; Berthe-Marie Imbert; Thomas Drumel; Beatrice Mahé; Viviane Dubruille; Nicolas Blin; Anne Lok; Cyrille Touzeau; Thomas Gastinne; Benoît Tessoulin; Maxime Jullien; Sophie Vantyghem; Philippe Moreau; Steven Le Gouill; Marie C Béné; Patrice Chevallier
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 8.615

7.  Repeated vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust polyfunctional T cell response in allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipients.

Authors:  Patrick Harrington; Katie J Doores; Chandan Saha; Jamie Saunders; Fiona Child; Richard Dillon; Sukran Saglam; Kavita Raj; Donal McLornan; Daniele Avenoso; Shahram Kordasti; Amy O'Reilly; Andreas Espehana; Thomas Lechmere; Hataf Khan; Michael H Malim; Claire Harrison; Varun Mehra; Hugues de Lavallade
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  B Cell Aplasia Is the Most Powerful Predictive Marker for Poor Humoral Response after BNT162b2 mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Maxime Jullien; Amandine Le Bourgeois; Marianne Coste-Burel; Pierre Peterlin; Alice Garnier; Marie Rimbert; Berthe-Marie Imbert; Steven Le Gouill; Philippe Moreau; Beatrice Mahe; Viviane Dubruille; Nicolas Blin; Anne Lok; Cyrille Touzeau; Thomas Gastinne; Benoit Tessoulin; Sophie Vantyghem; Marie C Béné; Thierry Guillaume; Patrice Chevallier
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2022-02-24

9.  SARS-CoV-2 T-Cell Responses in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Recipients following Two Doses of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine.

Authors:  Béatrice Clémenceau; Thierry Guillaume; Marianne Coste-Burel; Pierre Peterlin; Alice Garnier; Amandine Le Bourgeois; Maxime Jullien; Jocelyn Ollier; Audrey Grain; Marie C Béné; Henri Vié; Patrice Chevallier
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-14

10.  Two Doses of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine in Patients after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Humoral Response and Serological Conversion Predictors.

Authors:  Maciej Majcherek; Agnieszka Matkowska-Kocjan; Donata Szymczak; Magdalena Karasek; Agnieszka Szeremet; Aleksandra Kiraga; Aneta Milanowska; Edwin Kuznik; Krzysztof Kujawa; Tomasz Wrobel; Leszek Szenborn; Anna Czyz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.