Literature DB >> 34518914

Carotid Doppler Ultrasonography for Hemodynamic Assessment in Critically Ill Children.

Aline Junqueira Rubio1, Luiza Lobo de Souza1, Roberto J N Nogueira1,2, Marcelo B Brandão1, Tiago H de Souza3.   

Abstract

An accurate assessment of cardiovascular performance is essential to predict and evaluate hemodynamic response to interventions. The objective of this prospective study was to assess whether point-of-care ultrasonography of the common carotid artery (CCA) can estimate the stroke volume (SV) and cardiac index (Ci) of critically ill children. Participants underwent Doppler ultrasonography of the left CCA and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Variables measured by TTE were SV and Ci. Carotid blood flow (CBF) was calculated based on both systolic velocity-time integral (CBF(s)) and total velocity-time integral (CBF(t)). Carotid corrected flow time(CFT)was also determined. A total of 50 children were enrolled. The median age and weight of participants were 36.0 months and 14.2 kg, respectively. Both CBF(s) and CBF(t) correlated very strongly with SV (ρ = 0.98 and 0.97, respectively) and Ci (ρ = 0.96 and 0.92, respectively). Agreement analysis showed low biases and clinically acceptable percentage errors between variables measured by TTE (SV and Ci) and those estimated by Doppler ultrasonography. Linear regression analysis revealed that the Ci of mechanically ventilated children can be estimated by the following equation: [Formula: see text]. CFT did not significantly correlate with SV or Ci (ρ = 0.27 and 0.05, respectively). Doppler ultrasonography of the left CCA is able to estimate the SV and Ci of critically ill children. Therefore, the CDU may be considered as an alternative for estimating Ci in critically ill children when TTE is not feasible or available.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac output; Child, infant; Common carotid artery; Doppler ultrasonography; Hemodynamic monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34518914     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-021-02732-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  17 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 2.  Accuracy and repeatability of pediatric cardiac output measurement using Doppler: 20-year review of the literature.

Authors:  Michelle S Chew; Jan Poelaert
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance: Clinical assessment compared with a noninvasive objective measurement in children with shock.

Authors:  Asma Razavi; Christopher J L Newth; Robinder G Khemani; Fernando Beltramo; Patrick A Ross
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 4.  Accuracy and precision of minimally-invasive cardiac output monitoring in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Koichi Suehiro; Alexandre Joosten; Linda Suk-Ling Murphy; Olivier Desebbe; Brenton Alexander; Sang-Hyun Kim; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Common Carotid Artery Sonography Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Cardiac Output Measurements in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Authors:  Qian-Yi Peng; Li-Na Zhang; Mei-Lin Ai; Li Li; Cheng-Huan Hu; Yan-Xin Zhang; Wei Liu; Qing Feng; Yu Zou; Yu-Hang Ai
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 6.  Predicting fluid responsiveness in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Heng Gan; Maxime Cannesson; John R Chandler; J Mark Ansermino
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Association Between Fluid Balance and Outcomes in Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rashid Alobaidi; Catherine Morgan; Rajit K Basu; Erin Stenson; Robin Featherstone; Sumit R Majumdar; Sean M Bagshaw
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 16.193

8.  Ultrasound Guidance for Pediatric Central Venous Catheterization: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tiago Henrique de Souza; Marcelo Barciela Brandão; José Antonio Hersan Nadal; Roberto José Negrão Nogueira
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Focused cardiac ultrasound: a training course for pediatric intensivists and emergency physicians.

Authors:  Heloisa A Gaspar; Samira S Morhy; Alessandro C Lianza; Werther B de Carvalho; Jose L Andrade; Rogério R do Prado; Cláudio Schvartsman; Artur F Delgado
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 10.  Clinical review: Does it matter which hemodynamic monitoring system is used?

Authors:  Davinder Ramsingh; Brenton Alexander; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.