| Literature DB >> 34518228 |
Tom Scheidt1, Jacqueline A Carozza1, Carl C Kolbe1, Francesco A Aprile1, Olga Tkachenko2, Mathias M J Bellaiche1, Georg Meisl1, Quentin A E Peter1, Therese W Herling1, Samuel Ness1, Marta Castellana-Cruz1, Justin L P Benesch2, Michele Vendruscolo1, Christopher M Dobson1, Paolo Arosio3,4, Tuomas P J Knowles3,5.
Abstract
Molecular chaperones are key components of the cellular proteostasis network whose role includes the suppression of the formation and proliferation of pathogenic aggregates associated with neurodegenerative diseases. The molecular principles that allow chaperones to recognize misfolded and aggregated proteins remain, however, incompletely understood. To address this challenge, here we probe the thermodynamics and kinetics of the interactions between chaperones and protein aggregates under native solution conditions using a microfluidic platform. We focus on the binding between amyloid fibrils of α-synuclein, associated with Parkinson's disease, to the small heat-shock protein αB-crystallin, a chaperone widely involved in the cellular stress response. We find that αB-crystallin binds to α-synuclein fibrils with high nanomolar affinity and that the binding is driven by entropy rather than enthalpy. Measurements of the change in heat capacity indicate significant entropic gain originates from the disassembly of the oligomeric chaperones that function as an entropic buffer system. These results shed light on the functional roles of chaperone oligomerization and show that chaperones are stored as inactive complexes which are capable of releasing active subunits to target aberrant misfolded species.Entities:
Keywords: aggregation; chaperones; kinetic analysis; microfluidics; thermodynamic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34518228 PMCID: PMC8463877 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2108790118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 12.779
Fig. 1.(A) Image of the microfluidic diffusion device on an epifluorescence microscope. Pipette tips hold the analyte and buffer, and flow is controlled by applying negative pressure at the outlet. (B) Schematic of the device. The analyte is focused between two buffer streams, and diffusion profiles are recorded at discrete detection points along the channel. Reproduced with permission from ref. 24 (Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society). (C) Experimental profiles of three chaperone-fibril samples exhibit different extent of binding: 0 (purple), about 50 (blue), and 100 (black) of total chaperones bound to fibrils. Normalized profiles are shown for three channel positions. The sample with 0 bound chaperone diffuses the most, whereas the sample with 100 bound chaperone stays most localized in the center of the channel. Partially bound samples exhibit superposition of two peak shapes: diffuse (corresponding to free chaperone) and localized (corresponding to bound chaperone). (D) Experimental profiles of B-c (1 μM) binding to -syn fibrils (10 μM) at C at 12 diffusion positions along the channel and the simulated profiles for the 50 bound sample. (E) The fitting of the model simulations to the experimental data provides a direct measure of the fraction of particles in each size bin.
Fig. 2.Kinetic data of B-c (1 μM) binding to -syn fibrils (10 μM) reveal kinetic parameters of binding. Kinetic traces at different temperatures were fit to a second-order rate equation to obtain the association () and dissociation () rate constants, from which an apparent dissociation constant was calculated. Different binding ratios of B-c equivalents (eq) to -syn fibril mass eq with (A) 1:5.4, (B) 1:10, (C) 1:20, and (D) 1:50 were simulated. The resulting values are plotted against the corresponding binding ratios as an inset in D. The optimal fit (A) is given with a stoichiometry of 1:5.4 with a lower boundary for the stoichiometry at 1:8 given by the SD.
Fig. 3.Thermodynamic parameters of B-c (1 μM) binding to -syn fibrils (10 μM) derived from the kinetic parameters of binding. (A) The enthalpic () and entropic () contribution together with the change in heat capacity () involved in the formation of the activated state of the binding partners were estimated using a model which combines polymer theory and Kramer’s problem of escape from a metastable state. Therefore, the free energy barrier of binding is . The large barrier suggests the binding is a highly activated process. (B) Values of were plotted according to the van’t Hoff equation to obtain the binding enthalpy () and entropy () together with the change in heat capacity (). The binding is enthalpically unfavorable and entropically favorable. Value at 37 °C was not included in analysis and is only given as an upper bound. The dashed red lines in A and B show similar fits with , indicating that the change in heat capacity is positive. (C) The reaction diagram shows the fraction of the individual thermodynamic parameters and shows that the overall chaperone–fibril binding is spontaneous with a free energy of .
Fig. 4.Binding mechanisms of B-c to -syn fibrils. The gain of entropy during the binding reaction of B-c to -syn fibrils can be explained either by (A) a solvent-mediated interaction through release of water molecules or (B) a conformational change of the binding partners. The observed positive change in heat capacity () supports the latter explanation.