Joleen M Hubbard1, Jun Yin2, Erin L Schenk1,3, Rui Qin2, Joel M Reid4, Carrie Strand2, Jack Fiskum2, Michael Menefee5, Grace Lin6, L Austin Doyle7, Percy Ivy7, Charles Erlichman1, Alex Adjei1, Paul Haluska1,8, Brian A Costello9. 1. Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. 2. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. 3. Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. 4. Division of Oncology Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. 5. VA Medical Center, Washington, DC, 20422, USA. 6. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. 7. Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of fHealth, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. 8. Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, 08648, USA. 9. Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. costello.brian@mayo.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway improves progression free survival in multiple advanced malignancies but durable responses are uncommon. Inhibition of the VEGF pathway at multiple levels of signal transduction may improve clinical outcomes. Preclinical data with cediranib, an inhibitor of all 3 VEGF receptors, in combination with selumetinib, an inhibitor of MEK 1/2, demonstrated improved tumor control experimentally. This phase I trial was designed to test the two agents in combination to evaluate the tolerability, safety and assess disease response. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were enrolled into this phase I trial. Cediranib and selumetinib were dosed using a toxicity-adaptive isotonic design for the dose escalation/de-escalation of each agent. Both cediranib and selumetinib were administered daily and continuously. Cycles were 28 days in length. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled. At all dose levels, dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed, which limited dose escalation and further evaluation. The maximum tolerated dose of cediranib and selumetinib in combination could not be determined. The best response of stable disease was observed in eight patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cediranib and selumetinib in combination on a continuous schedule was not tolerable, with patients experiencing cardiovascular and other DLTs. Intermittent schedules may be needed to establish a safe and tolerable combination of cediranib and selumetinib.
PURPOSE: Targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway improves progression free survival in multiple advanced malignancies but durable responses are uncommon. Inhibition of the VEGF pathway at multiple levels of signal transduction may improve clinical outcomes. Preclinical data with cediranib, an inhibitor of all 3 VEGF receptors, in combination with selumetinib, an inhibitor of MEK 1/2, demonstrated improved tumor control experimentally. This phase I trial was designed to test the two agents in combination to evaluate the tolerability, safety and assess disease response. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were enrolled into this phase I trial. Cediranib and selumetinib were dosed using a toxicity-adaptive isotonic design for the dose escalation/de-escalation of each agent. Both cediranib and selumetinib were administered daily and continuously. Cycles were 28 days in length. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled. At all dose levels, dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed, which limited dose escalation and further evaluation. The maximum tolerated dose of cediranib and selumetinib in combination could not be determined. The best response of stable disease was observed in eight patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cediranib and selumetinib in combination on a continuous schedule was not tolerable, with patients experiencing cardiovascular and other DLTs. Intermittent schedules may be needed to establish a safe and tolerable combination of cediranib and selumetinib.
Authors: Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Mitch A Phelps; Xiaobai Li; Motoyasu Saji; Laura Goff; John Sae Wook Kauh; Bert H O'Neil; Stephanie Balsom; Catherine Balint; Ryan Liersemann; Vasily V Vasko; Mark Bloomston; William Marsh; L Austin Doyle; Gilian Ellison; Michael Grever; Matthew D Ringel; Miguel A Villalona-Calero Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-04-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Linda L Garland; Kari Chansky; Antoinette J Wozniak; Anne S Tsao; Shirish M Gadgeel; Claire F Verschraegen; Marco A Dasilva; Mary Redman; David R Gandara Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: David Bender; Michael W Sill; Heather A Lankes; Henry D Reyes; Christopher J Darus; James E Delmore; Jacob Rotmensch; Heidi J Gray; Robert S Mannel; Jeanne M Schilder; Mark I Hunter; Carolyn K McCourt; Megan I Samuelson; Kimberly K Leslie Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Paulo M Hoff; Andreas Hochhaus; Bernhard C Pestalozzi; Niall C Tebbutt; Jin Li; Tae Won Kim; Krassimir D Koynov; Galina Kurteva; Tamás Pintér; Ying Cheng; Brigitte van Eyll; Laura Pike; Anitra Fielding; Jane D Robertson; Mark P Saunders Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-09-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Ursula A Matulonis; Suzanne Berlin; Percy Ivy; Karin Tyburski; Carolyn Krasner; Corrine Zarwan; Anna Berkenblit; Susana Campos; Neil Horowitz; Stephen A Cannistra; Hang Lee; Julie Lee; Maria Roche; Margaret Hill; Christin Whalen; Laura Sullivan; Chau Tran; Benjamin D Humphreys; Richard T Penson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hester van Cruijsen; Emile E Voest; Cornelis J A Punt; Klaas Hoekman; Petronella O Witteveen; Martijn R Meijerink; Thomas A Puchalski; Jane Robertson; Owain Saunders; Juliane M Jürgensmeier; Carla M L van Herpen; Giuseppe Giaccone Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Tracy T Batchelor; Paul Mulholland; Bart Neyns; L Burt Nabors; Mario Campone; Antje Wick; Warren Mason; Tom Mikkelsen; Surasak Phuphanich; Lynn S Ashby; John Degroot; Rao Gattamaneni; Lawrence Cher; Mark Rosenthal; Franz Payer; Juliane M Jürgensmeier; Rakesh K Jain; A Gregory Sorensen; John Xu; Qi Liu; Martin van den Bent Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-08-12 Impact factor: 44.544