Literature DB >> 22965965

Cediranib plus FOLFOX/CAPOX versus placebo plus FOLFOX/CAPOX in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized, double-blind, phase III study (HORIZON II).

Paulo M Hoff1, Andreas Hochhaus, Bernhard C Pestalozzi, Niall C Tebbutt, Jin Li, Tae Won Kim, Krassimir D Koynov, Galina Kurteva, Tamás Pintér, Ying Cheng, Brigitte van Eyll, Laura Pike, Anitra Fielding, Jane D Robertson, Mark P Saunders.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cediranib is a highly potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling with activity against all three VEGF receptors. HORIZON II [Cediranib (AZD2171, RECENTIN) in Addition to Chemotherapy Versus Placebo Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer] assessed infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin/capecitabine and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX/CAPOX) with or without cediranib in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were initially randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive cediranib (20 or 30 mg per day) or placebo plus FOLFOX/CAPOX. In an early analysis of this and two other cediranib studies (HORIZON I [Cediranib Plus FOLFOX6 Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX6 in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer] and HORIZON III [Cediranib Plus FOLFOX6 Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX6 in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer]), the 20-mg dose met the predefined criteria for continuation. Subsequent patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to the cediranib 20 mg or placebo arms. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were coprimary end points.
RESULTS: In all, 860 patients received cediranib 20 mg (n = 502) or placebo (n = 358). The addition of cediranib to FOLFOX/CAPOX resulted in PFS prolongation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98; P = .0121; median PFS, 8.6 months for cediranib v 8.3 months for placebo) but had no impact on OS (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.12; P = .5707; median OS, 19.7 months for cediranib v 18.9 months for placebo). There were no significant differences in the secondary end points of objective response rate, duration of response, or liver resection rate. Median chemotherapy dose-intensity was decreased by approximately 10% in patients treated with cediranib. Adverse events (AEs) associated with cediranib were manageable. CONCLUSION Addition of cediranib 20 mg to FOLFOX/CAPOX resulted in a modest PFS prolongation, but no significant difference in OS. The cediranib AE profile was consistent with those from previous studies. Because of the lack of improvement in OS, cediranib plus an oxaliplatin-based regimen cannot be recommended as a treatment for patients with mCRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22965965     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.6031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  57 in total

Review 1.  New trends in molecular and cellular biomarker discovery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Parisa Aghagolzadeh; Ramin Radpour
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Continuum of care with anti-angiogenic therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Brandon G Smaglo; Jimmy Hwang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-09

3.  Combined MEK and VEGFR inhibition in orthotopic human lung cancer models results in enhanced inhibition of tumor angiogenesis, growth, and metastasis.

Authors:  Osamu Takahashi; Ritsuko Komaki; Paul D Smith; Juliane M Jürgensmeier; Anderson Ryan; B Nebiyou Bekele; Ignacio I Wistuba; Jörg J Jacoby; Maria V Korshunova; Anna Biernacka; Baruch Erez; Keiko Hosho; Roy S Herbst; Michael S O'Reilly
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Atypical reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS) induced by cediranib in a patient with metastatic rectal cancer.

Authors:  Christina A K Kim; Julie Price-Hiller; Quincy S Chu; Keith Tankel; Ron Hennig; Michael B Sawyer; Jennifer L Spratlin
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Novel Therapies in Development for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Michael S Lee; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09

6.  Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zexin Lin; Yilin Yang; Yongliang Huang; Junjie Liang; Fang Lu; Xuejun Lao
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-15

Review 7.  Targeting Angiogenesis in Cancer Therapy: Moving Beyond Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor.

Authors:  Yujie Zhao; Alex A Adjei
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-05-22

Review 8.  Antiangiogenic therapy for refractory colorectal cancer: current options and future strategies.

Authors:  Rachel Riechelmann; Axel Grothey
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 8.168

9.  Gastrointestinal cancer: A promising horizon for cediranib?

Authors:  M Teresa Villanueva
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Targeted approach to metastatic colorectal cancer: what comes beyond epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies and bevacizumab?

Authors:  Teresa Troiani; Erika Martinelli; Floriana Morgillo; Anna Capasso; Anna Nappi; Vincenzo Sforza; Fortunato Ciardiello
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 8.168

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.