Background: Lay health workers (LHWs) engaging African Americans in conversations about advance care planning (ACP) often have felt unprepared for the challenges of communicating with patients as they approach the end of life. We developed a church-based training curriculum, LIGHT (Listening, Identifying, Guiding, Helping, Translating), in response to this need. Objectives: To evaluate the LIGHT Curriculum by assessing its impact on knowledge, beliefs and attitudes, and self-efficacy of the learners; describing their assessment of the classroom component of the training; and describing their visit activities, and perceptions derived during client visits. Design: prospective, descriptive, pre- and post-training evaluation. Settings/Subjects: Thirty-seven LHWs (Comfort Care Supporters [CCSs]) from three African American Churches (United States). Measurements: knowledge, beliefs and attitudes, assessment of classroom training, self-efficacy, visit activities, and perceptions. Results: Pre-to-post knowledge scores (range 0-26) increased by a mean of 5.23, p < 0.0001. Agreement with favorable beliefs about palliative and hospice care (HC) did not change significantly post-training. Disagreement with unfavorable beliefs about hospice increased, most notably, the belief that hospice means a place where people go to die (43% to 87%, p = 0.003) and HC means giving up (77% to 93%, p = 0.03). Post-training, 94% of the CCSs felt prepared to function in their roles. The CCSs who visited clients demonstrated the ability to engage clients and families in conversations about issues important to ACP, end-of-life decision making and care, and the ability to identify relevant benefits and challenges of their roles. Conclusions: LHWs, trained using the LIGHT Curriculum, can acquire the knowledge and self-efficacy necessary to support African American clients with ACP, end-of-life decision making, and end-of-life care.
Background: Lay health workers (LHWs) engaging African Americans in conversations about advance care planning (ACP) often have felt unprepared for the challenges of communicating with patients as they approach the end of life. We developed a church-based training curriculum, LIGHT (Listening, Identifying, Guiding, Helping, Translating), in response to this need. Objectives: To evaluate the LIGHT Curriculum by assessing its impact on knowledge, beliefs and attitudes, and self-efficacy of the learners; describing their assessment of the classroom component of the training; and describing their visit activities, and perceptions derived during client visits. Design: prospective, descriptive, pre- and post-training evaluation. Settings/Subjects: Thirty-seven LHWs (Comfort Care Supporters [CCSs]) from three African American Churches (United States). Measurements: knowledge, beliefs and attitudes, assessment of classroom training, self-efficacy, visit activities, and perceptions. Results: Pre-to-post knowledge scores (range 0-26) increased by a mean of 5.23, p < 0.0001. Agreement with favorable beliefs about palliative and hospice care (HC) did not change significantly post-training. Disagreement with unfavorable beliefs about hospice increased, most notably, the belief that hospice means a place where people go to die (43% to 87%, p = 0.003) and HC means giving up (77% to 93%, p = 0.03). Post-training, 94% of the CCSs felt prepared to function in their roles. The CCSs who visited clients demonstrated the ability to engage clients and families in conversations about issues important to ACP, end-of-life decision making and care, and the ability to identify relevant benefits and challenges of their roles. Conclusions: LHWs, trained using the LIGHT Curriculum, can acquire the knowledge and self-efficacy necessary to support African American clients with ACP, end-of-life decision making, and end-of-life care.
Entities:
Keywords:
African American Church; LIGHT Curriculum; end-of-life; evaluation; lay health workers; palliative care
Authors: Gabrielle B Rocque; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Chao-Hui Sylvia Huang; Soumya J Niranjan; Courtney P Williams; Bradford E Jackson; Karina I Halilova; Kelly M Kenzik; Kerri S Bevis; Audrey S Wallace; Nedra Lisovicz; Richard A Taylor; Maria Pisu; Edward E Partridge; Thomas W Butler; Linda A Briggs; Elizabeth A Kvale Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Soumya J Niranjan; Chao-Hui S Huang; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Karina I Halilova; Maria Pisu; Patricia Drentea; Elizabeth A Kvale; Kerri S Bevis; Thomas W Butler; Edward E Partridge; Gabrielle B Rocque Journal: J Palliat Care Date: 2018-02-12 Impact factor: 2.250
Authors: Debra K Litzelman; Thomas S Inui; Kathleen M Schmitt-Wendholt; Anthony Perkins; Wilma J Griffin; Ann H Cottingham; Steven S Ivy Journal: J Community Health Date: 2017-10
Authors: Regina M Fink; Danielle M Kline; F Amos Bailey; Daniel L Handel; Sarah R Jordan; Hillary D Lum; Stacy M Fischer Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2020-01-16 Impact factor: 2.947