| Literature DB >> 34513802 |
Dusty R Miller1, Ethan S McClain1, James N Dodds1,2,3,4,5, Andrzej Balinski1,2,3,4,5, Jody C May1,2,3,4,5, John A McLean1,2,3,4,5, David E Cliffel1,3,5.
Abstract
Despite the significant progress in both scientific understanding and regulations, the safety of agricultural pesticides continues to be called into question. The need for complementary analytics to identify dysregulation events associated with chemical exposure and leverage this information to predict biological responses remains. Here, we present a platform that combines a model organ-on-chip neurovascular unit (NVU) with targeted mass spectrometry (MS) and electrochemical analysis to assess the impact of organophosphate (OP) exposure on blood-brain barrier (BBB) function. Using the NVU to simulate exposure, an escalating dose of the organophosphate chlorpyrifos (CPF) was administered. With up to 10 μM, neither CPF nor its metabolites were detected across the BBB (limit of quantitation 0.1 µM). At 30 µM CPF and above, targeted MS detected the main urinary metabolite, trichloropyridinol (TCP), across the BBB (0.025 µM) and no other metabolites. In the vascular chamber where CPF was directly applied, two primary metabolites of CPF, TCP and diethylthiophosphate (DETP), were both detected (0.1-5.7 µM). In a second experiment, a constant dose of 10 µM CPF was administered to the NVU, and though neither CPF nor its metabolites were detected across the BBB after 24 h, electrochemical analysis detected increases in acetylcholine levels on both sides of the BBB (up to 24.8 ± 3.4 µM) and these levels remained high over the course of treatment. In the vascular chamber where CPF was directly applied, only TCP was detected (ranging from 0.06 μM at 2 h to 0.19 μM at 24 h). These results provide chemical evidence of the substantial disruption induced by this widely used commercial pesticide. This work reinforces previously observed OP metabolism and mechanisms of impact, validates the use of the NVU for OP toxicology testing, and provides a model platform for analyzing these organotypic systems.Entities:
Keywords: electrochemistry; mass spectrometry; organ-on-a-chip; organophosphate; pesticide
Year: 2021 PMID: 34513802 PMCID: PMC8431803 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.622175
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Schematic of acetylcholine and chlorpyrifos biochemistry. (A) Schematic of the mechanism of CPF toxicology at the cholinergic synapse showing normal signaling where acetylcholine is recognized by the acetylcholine receptor on the dendrite’s postsynaptic membrane before being rapidly broken down by acetylcholinesterase into acetic acid and choline. Normally, the free choline is taken back up into the presynaptic neuron where choline acetyltransferase turns it back into acetylcholine before it is packaged into vesicles for subsequent release. The red “X” indicates CPO-induced inhibition of acetylcholinesterase that leads to a buildup of acetylcholine in the synaptic cleft and, eventually, excitotoxicity, neuropathy, and death. (B) The major metabolic pathway for CPF bioactivation, dearylation, and biodegradation showing associated primary metabolites including CPF; chlorpyrifos oxon (CPO); diethylthiophosphate (DETP); and 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCP).
FIGURE 2Effect of CPF on acetylcholine metabolism within the NVU as determined from the electrochemical assay. (A) Bar graph indicating the change in acetylcholine concentration from control (DMSO) in vascular side eluate over time (2, 4, 8, or 24 h treatment), showing elevated acetylcholine levels (24 ± 3 µM) after 2 h of CPF treatment (10 µM CPF, p-value < 0.003). (B) Bar graph indicating a change in acetylcholine concentration in neuronal side eluate over time showing elevated acetylcholine (95 ± 10 µM) 2 h after CPF was administered to the vascular side, a significant increase from the control (p-value < 0.04). Data are represented as the means and standard errors, symbols represent technical replicates, n = 6–9 for samples, and n = 9–12 for controls. Control samples were collected over 24 h and their respective collection time is indicated in the control key.
FIGURE 3Representative microscopy images of endothelial cells within an NVU following 24 h of continuous exposure with either (A) DMSO (vehicle control, panel A) or (B) CPF (10 μM, panel B). The lattice seen at the right of each image is the microfluidic channels of the vascular side of the NVU. (A) A control NVU showing evenly dispersed cells with typical morphology, indicating a healthy BBB. (B) A CPF-treated NVU showing punctate cell morphology (contracted cells), indicating cellular stress in response to the CPF treatment. For these experiments, the NVUs were perfused with neurobasal media on the neuronal side and EBM2 media on the vascular side either with or without CPF. All cultures were maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2.
FIGURE 4Distribution of CPF and its three primary metabolites at and across the BBB with lengthening exposure times. Using targeted MS, CPF and its metabolites were quantified in both the vascular (upper plots) and neuronal (lower plots) eluate media samples. These samples were obtained at lengthening durations of exposure to 10 µM CPF within the NVU. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) was determined from serial dilutions of a TCP standard. An internal standard, DtBP, was used to calibrate instrument response during each sample injection.