| Literature DB >> 34513326 |
Zhiqiao Zhao1, Xulong Wu2, Hong Chen3, Yuntao Liu3, Yirong Xiao4, Hui Chen1, Zizhong Tang1, Qingfeng Li1, Huipeng Yao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Functional fermented beverages are popular worldwide due to their potential to promote health. Starter culture is the main determinant of the final quality and flavor of fermented beverages. The co-cultivation of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and yeast makes a significant contribution to the safe flavor of fermented beverages. However, the research on the potential of antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-biofilm formation of strawberry fermented beverage obtained by combining the LAB and yeast as starter cultures has not been well explored.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-biofilm formation; Antioxidant Capacity; Fermentation; Fluorescence microscopy; Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis; Fruit fermented beverage; Pathogenic bacteria; Probiotics; Sensory analysis; Strawberry
Year: 2021 PMID: 34513326 PMCID: PMC8388556 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Flow diagram.
Figure 2Fourier transform infrared spectra for the strawberry juice (A) and fermented beverage (B) and second-order derivative spectra with strawberry juice (C) and fermented beverage (D).
Analysis of antioxidants in the strawberry fermented beverage.
| Parameter | Non-fermented | Fermented |
|---|---|---|
| Total phenolic(mg/mL) | 3.47 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.03 |
| Total flavonoids(mg/mL) | 0.40 ± 0.05 | 0.01 ± 0.001 |
| T-SOD(U/mL) | 80.99 ± 1.95 | 121.47 ± 1.02 |
Notes.
Values are expressed as mean (n = 3) ±SD; Independent-sample t-test used to evaluate the significant difference among various treatments. Differences were considered to be significant at p < 0.01 (**).
Non-fermented corresponds to strawberry juice; Fermented corresponds to fermented beverages. The following occurrences all mean the same thing.
Figure 3Evaluation of scavenging free radical capacity.
DPPH radical-scavenging activity assay (A); Hydroxyl free radical scavenging activity assay (B); Superoxide anion radical-scavenging activity assay (C); ABTS radical-scavenging activity assay (D).
Figure 4Evaluation of T-AOC.
Means that do not share the same letter are significantly different at p < 0.05.
The diameter of the inhibition zone of the strawberry fermented beverage prepared by lactic acid bacteria and yeast on pathogenic microorganisms.
| Microorganisms | Inhibition zone diameter(mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 mg/mL ampicillin | Sterile water | Non-fermented | Fermented | |
| 24.50 ± 1.114 | 0 | 0 | 28.30 ± 1.80 | |
| 24.03 ± 0.61 | 0 | 0 | 26.60 ± 1.65 | |
| 22.53 ± 0.25 | 0 | 0 | 23.13 ± 1.42 | |
| 9.80 ± 0.36 | 0 | 0 | 23.87 ± 2.11 | |
Notes.
Values are expressed as mean (n = 3) ±SD; Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the significant difference among various treatments, with the criterion of p < 0.05.
Means that do not share the same letter are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 5Effects of fermented beverage on growth curve of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (A) and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 (B).
Figure 6Fluorescence microscopy with biofilm coverslips.
Biofilms were stained with acridine orange. Barequals 100 µm. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 biofilm (A), control coverslip; Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 biofilm treated with 0.15 mL/mL fermented beverage (B); Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 biofilm (C), control coverslip; Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 biofilm treated with 0.15 mL/mL fermented beverage (D).
Figure 7Sensory evaluation of color, appearance, flavor, taste and over impression of strawberry juice and fermented beverage.