Gajanan A Rodge1, Mahesh K Goenka1, Usha Goenka2, Shivaraj Afzalpurkar1, Bhavik B Shah1. 1. Institute of Gastrosciences & Liver, Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, 58, Canal Circular Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700054, India. 2. Department of Clinical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, 58, Canal Circular Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700054, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-estimated proton density fat fraction (PDFF) has emerged to be a promising tool in quantification of liver fat. Aim of this study was to quantify liver fat using MRI-PDFF in patients with suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and to correlate it with the presence of metabolic syndrome (MetS), ultrasonography (USG) and liver function test (LFT). METHODS: We included 111 consecutive patients who were suspected to have NAFLD on the basis of clinical, laboratory or USG findings. A 3 Tesla Phillips MRI machine was used with a software named "mDixon Quant" for quantification of the liver fat. RESULTS: MRI-PDFF revealed hepatic steatosis grading as Grade 0 in 31 patients (28%), Grade I in 40 (36%), Grade II in 19 (17.1%) and Grade III in 21 patients (18.9%). MetS patients had higher proportion of advanced steatosis (Grades II and III) as compared to those without MetS (P < 0.001). ALT (alanine transaminase) was found to be significantly elevated (>1.5 times) in the patients with advanced steatosis as compared to patients with Grades I and 0 fatty liver on MRI-PDFF (P < 0.001). The Kappa measure of agreement between USG and MRI-PDFF was found to be 0.2, which suggests a low level of agreement between the two tests. CONCLUSION: MetS patients have higher proportion of advanced steatosis (Grades II and III) at MRI-PDFF as compared to those without MetS. Patients with advanced steatosis at MRI-PDFF had higher proportion of abnormal LFTs as compared to those with Grades 0 and I hepatic steatosis. There was a dis-correlation between MRI-PDFF and USG in the evaluation of NAFLD.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-estimated proton density fat fraction (PDFF) has emerged to be a promising tool in quantification of liver fat. Aim of this study was to quantify liver fat using MRI-PDFF in patients with suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and to correlate it with the presence of metabolic syndrome (MetS), ultrasonography (USG) and liver function test (LFT). METHODS: We included 111 consecutive patients who were suspected to have NAFLD on the basis of clinical, laboratory or USG findings. A 3 Tesla Phillips MRI machine was used with a software named "mDixon Quant" for quantification of the liver fat. RESULTS: MRI-PDFF revealed hepatic steatosis grading as Grade 0 in 31 patients (28%), Grade I in 40 (36%), Grade II in 19 (17.1%) and Grade III in 21 patients (18.9%). MetS patients had higher proportion of advanced steatosis (Grades II and III) as compared to those without MetS (P < 0.001). ALT (alanine transaminase) was found to be significantly elevated (>1.5 times) in the patients with advanced steatosis as compared to patients with Grades I and 0 fatty liver on MRI-PDFF (P < 0.001). The Kappa measure of agreement between USG and MRI-PDFF was found to be 0.2, which suggests a low level of agreement between the two tests. CONCLUSION: MetS patients have higher proportion of advanced steatosis (Grades II and III) at MRI-PDFF as compared to those without MetS. Patients with advanced steatosis at MRI-PDFF had higher proportion of abnormal LFTs as compared to those with Grades 0 and I hepatic steatosis. There was a dis-correlation between MRI-PDFF and USG in the evaluation of NAFLD.
Authors: Anneloes E Bohte; Bart G P Koot; Olga H van der Baan-Slootweg; Jochem R van Werven; Shandra Bipat; Aart J Nederveen; Peter L M Jansen; Marc A Benninga; Jaap Stoker Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-11-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Z Permutt; T-A Le; M R Peterson; E Seki; D A Brenner; C Sirlin; R Loomba Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Veeral Ajmera; Charlie C Park; Cyrielle Caussy; Seema Singh; Carolyn Hernandez; Ricki Bettencourt; Jonathan Hooker; Ethan Sy; Cynthia Behling; Ronghui Xu; Michael S Middleton; Mark A Valasek; Claire Faulkner; Emily Rizo; Lisa Richards; Claude B Sirlin; Rohit Loomba Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Alexandre Losekann; Antonio C Weston; Angelo A de Mattos; Cristiane V Tovo; Luis A de Carli; Marilia B Espindola; Sergio R Pioner; Gabriela P Coral Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 5.923