| Literature DB >> 34511123 |
Chih-Hao Chen1, Hai-Jui Chu1,2, Yi-Ting Hwang3, Yen-Heng Lin4, Chung-Wei Lee5, Sung-Chun Tang6, Jiann-Shing Jeng1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Timely endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) significantly improves outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion type. However, whether certain central nervous system-specific plasma biomarkers correlate with the outcomes is unknown. We evaluated the temporal changes and prognostic roles of the levels of these biomarkers in patients with AIS undergoing EVT.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarkers; Hemorrhage; Ischemic stroke; Outcome; Thrombectomy
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34511123 PMCID: PMC8436486 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-021-02254-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Comparison between favorable and unfavorable outcomes in patients receiving EVT
| All patients | mRS 0–2 ( | mRS 3–6 ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 71.2±11.8 | 68.4±11.3 | 74.4±11.6 | |
| Male sex | 34 (56.7%) | 23 (71.9%) | 11 (39.3%) | |
| Hypertension | 39 (65.0%) | 19 (59.4%) | 20 (71.4%) | 0.33 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 22 (36.7%) | 11 (34.4%) | 11 (39.3%) | 0.69 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 33 (55.0%) | 17 (53.1%) | 16 (57.1%) | 0.76 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 37 (61.7%) | 16 (50.0%) | 21 (75.0%) | |
| tPA administration | 16 (26.7%) | 7 (21.9%) | 9 (32.1%) | 0.37 |
| NIHSS | 16.3±6.9 | 15.1±6.3 | 17.7±7.5 | 0.18 |
| Stroke subtype | 0.59 | |||
| Cardioembolism | 43 (71.7%) | 22 (68.8%) | 21 (75.0%) | |
| Large-artery atherosclerosis | 10 (16.7%) | 5 (15.6%) | 5 (17.9%) | |
| Others | 7 (11.7%) | 5 (15.6%) | 2 (7.1%) | |
| ICA/M1 occlusion | 44 (73.3%) | 23 (71.9%) | 21 (75.0%) | 0.78 |
| Procedure time | ||||
| Onset-to-puncture (min) | 210 (138, 360) | 239 (144, 418) | 203 (134, 278) | 0.30 |
| Onset-to-recanalized (min) | 234 (156, 391) | 259 (159, 439) | 215 (144, 336) | 0.37 |
| mTICI 2c-3 | 43 (71.7%) | 27 (84.4%) | 16 (57.1%) | |
| Neuroimaging | ||||
| ASPECTS | 8 (7, 9) | 9 (7, 9) | 8 (7, 10) | 0.38 |
| Initial core (ml) | 20 (6, 38) | 14 (3, 26) | 26 (12, 47) | 0.03 |
| Penumbra (ml) | 64 (32, 89) | 57 (32, 79) | 65 (43, 102) | 0.40 |
| Final infarct (ml) | 13.9 (3.8, 61.4) | 8.7 (1.7, 22.4) | 24.5 (6.5, 139.1) | |
| Outcome | ||||
| mRS score | 2 (1, 4) | 1 (1, 2) | 5 (4, 5) | |
| Mortality | 4 (6.7%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (14.3%) | |
| Any ICH | 20 (33.3%) | 9 (28.1%) | 11 (39.3%) | 0.36 |
| Hemorrhagic infarct | 14 (23.3%) | 7 (21.9%) | 7 (25.0%) | 0.78 |
| Parenchymal hemorrhage | 6 (10.0%) | 2 (6.3%) | 4 (14.3%) | 0.40 |
The Mann–Whitney U test was used for the continuous variables, whereas the chi-square test was used for the categorical variables. Bold type indicates significant results (P < 0.05)
ASPECTS Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, ICA internal carotid artery, ICH intracerebral hemorrhage, mRS modified Rankin Scale, mTICI modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction, NIHSS National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, tPA tissue-type plasminogen activator
Comparison between the controls and the patients with stroke (at baseline before thrombectomy)
| Control ( | Stroke ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 66.0±1.41 | 71.2±11.8 | 0.001 |
| Male sex | 8 (57.1%) | 34 (56.7%) | 0.97 |
| Hypertension | 12 (85.7) | 39 (65.0%) | 0.20 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 5 (35.7%) | 22 (36.7%) | 0.95 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 10 (71.4%) | 33 (55.0%) | 0.37 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 5 (35.7%) | 37 (61.7%) | 0.13 |
| NfL pg/ml | 9.44 (7.73, 13.0) | 33.3 (19.6, 88.9) | 0.046 |
| GFAP pg/mL | 82.9 (55.3, 114.0) | 238.8 (146.0, 330.5) | 0.015 |
| Tau pg/mL | 1.62 (1.12, 2.00) | 1.71 (0.97, 2.87) | 0.26 |
| UCHL1 pg/mL | 7.30 (4.13, 13.5) | 83.6 (64.8, 107.6) | <0.001 |
| Log NfL | 2.33±0.37 | 3.74±1.17 | <0.001 |
| Log GFAP | 4.35±0.50 | 5.63±0.97 | <0.001 |
| Log Tau | 0.31±0.75 | 0.38±1.12 | 0.61 |
| Log UCHL1 | 1.95±0.91 | 4.41±0.40 | <0.001 |
The count and continuous variables are expressed as numbers (percentages) and as mean ± standard deviations, respectively, except for the raw biomarker data, which are presented as medians (first quartile, third quartile) because of their nonnormal distributions. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for the raw biomarker data, a t test was used for the natural log–transformed biomarkers, and the P values for biomarkers were adjusted for age
Fig. 1Comparison of biomarkers levels between patients and controls
Changes in biomarker levels according to different outcomes
| Time points | Overall ( | TICI 2c–3 ( | TICI 0–2b ( | mRS 0–2 ( | mRS 3–6 ( | No ICH ( | HI ( | PH ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NfL | T1 | 3.74±1.17 | 3.80±1.19 | 3.58±1.13 | 3.55±1.27 | 3.95±1.03 | 3.86±1.19 | 3.42±0.71 | 3.66±1.84 |
| T2 | 3.70±1.23 | 3.76±1.26 | 3.55±1.16 | 3.48±1.33 | 3.95±1.62 | 3.83±1.25 | 3.36±0.76 | 3.65±1.91 | |
| T3 | 4.30±1.15 | 4.35±1.13 | 4.14±1.22 | 3.95±1.09 | 4.79±1.06 | 4.35±1.22 | 3.91±0.55 | 4.69±1.37 | |
| GFAP | T1 | 5.63±0.97 | 5.56±0.85 | 5.82±1.25 | 5.50±0.99 | 5.78±0.96 | 5.64±0.96 | 5.64±1.00 | 5.55±1.16 |
| T2 | 5.76±0.99 | 5.66±0.87 | 6.02±1.23 | 5.60±0.98 | 5.95±0.98 | 5.73±0.98 | 5.77±1.02 | 5.94±1.16 | |
| T3 | 7.81±1.79 | 7.83±1.77 | 7.76±1.95 | 7.50±1.64 | 8.25±1.94 | 7.44±1.60 | 8.08±1.98 | 9.99±1.32 | |
| Tau | T1 | 0.38±1.12 | 0.44±1.15 | 0.23±1.06 | 0.39±1.28 | 0.37±0.93 | 0.55±1.10 | 0.21±0.98 | −0.37±1.39 |
| T2 | 0.76±0.90 | 0.83±0.83 | 0.58±1.07 | 0.83±0.89 | 0.68±0.92 | 0.89±0.90 | 0.48±0.73 | 0.51±1.20 | |
| T3 | 1.43±1.35 | 1.36±1.48 | 1.69±0.67 | 1.30±1.18 | 1.61±1.57 | 1.51±1.48 | 1.04±1.03 | 1.60±0.70 | |
| UCHL1 | T1 | 4.41±0.40 | 4.41±0.42 | 4.40±0.37 | 4.39±0.39 | 4.42±0.42 | 4.41±0.41 | 4.49±0.40 | 4.18±0.35 |
| T2 | 4.41±0.41 | 4.39±0.44 | 4.46±0.32 | 4.32±0.42 | 4.51±0.37 | 4.40±0.40 | 4.46±0.47 | 4.33±0.39 | |
| T3 | 4.83±0.69 | 4.81±0.67 | 4.89±0.79 | 4.65±0.54 | 5.08±0.81 | 4.71±0.62 | 4.87±0.69 | 5.61±0.81 | |
P, P, P = overall group difference, P= whether groups diverged differently over time. ICH intracerebral hemorrhage, HI hemorrhagic infarction, PH parenchymal hemorrhage
Fig. 2Changes in biomarkers levels in patients with successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] score 2c or 3) versus unsuccessful recanalization (mTICI score 0–2b)
Fig. 3Changes in biomarkers levels in patients with death or disability (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 3–6) versus functional independency (mRS score 0–2) at 90 days after stroke
Fig. 4Comparison of changes in biomarker levels between patients stratified according to type of hemorrhagic transformation (no hemorrhage, hemorrhagic infarction, or parenchymal hemorrhage).
Associations between biomarker levels and clinical outcomes
| Time points | Death or disability ( | Any hemorrhagic transformation ( | Parenchymal hemorrhage ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||
| NfL | T1 | 0.64 (0.35–1.17) | 0.94 (0.45–1.98) | |
| T2 | 0.65 (0.37–1.16) | 0.96 (0.48–1.94) | ||
| T3 | 0.74 (0.39–1.42) | 1.35 (0.64–2.84) | ||
| All | 0.67 (0.40–1.15) | 1.05 (0.44–2.55) | ||
| GFAP | T1 | 1.42 (0.73–2.78) | 1.01 (0.53–1.91) | 0.90 (0.36–2.26) |
| T2 | 1.49 (0.75–2.97) | 1.19 (0.64–2.24) | 1.21 (0.55–2.70) | |
| T3 | 1.28 (0.84–1.95) | |||
| All | 1.18 (0.91–1.52) | 1.21 (0.96–1.53) | 1.29 (0.97–1.70) | |
| Tau | T1 | 1.19 (0.66–2.14) | 0.57 (0.29–1.11) | |
| T2 | 1.13 (0.50–2.55) | 0.73 (0.30–1.78) | ||
| T3 | 1.14 (0.70–1.86) | 0.85 (0.53–1.39) | 1.10 (0.57–2.14) | |
| All | 1.11 (0.76–1.63) | 0.63 (0.38–1.07) | 0.79 (0.46–1.36) | |
| UCHL1 | T1 | 0.83 (0.19–3.70) | 0.84 (0.16–4.49) | 0.22 (0.03–1.85) |
| T2 | 2.60 (0.53–12.64) | 1.04 (0.20–5.35) | 0.60 (0.08–4.46) | |
| T3 | 2.73 (0.88–8.51) | 2.64 (0.83–8.41) | ||
| All | 1.76 (0.59–5.23) | 1.38 (0.53–3.61) | 1.56 (0.56–4.31) |
Covariates adjusted for in the logistic regression models were age, sex, NIHSS score, atrial fibrillation, and successful recanalization for death or disability; age, sex, hypertension, and NIHSS score for any hemorrhagic transformation; and none for parenchymal hemorrhage. Generalized linear mixed models were employed to model all of the time points together. Bold type indicates significant results (P < 0.05). *False discovery rate–adjusted P < 0.05