| Literature DB >> 34508087 |
Lisa M Bebell1, Kathy Burgoine2, Mercedeh Movassagh3, Christine Hehnly4, Lijun Zhang4, Kim Moran4, Kathryn Sheldon5, Shamim A Sinnar5, Edith Mbabazi-Kabachelor6, Elias Kumbakumba7, Joel Bazira8, Moses Ochora7, Ronnie Mulondo6, Brian Kaaya Nsubuga6, Andrew D Weeks9, Melissa Gladstone9, Peter Olupot-Olupot2,10, Joseph Ngonzi11, Drucilla J Roberts12, Frederick A Meier13, Rafael A Irizarry3, James R Broach4, Steven J Schiff14, Joseph N Paulson15.
Abstract
The composition of the maternal vaginal microbiome influences the duration of pregnancy, onset of labor, and even neonatal outcomes. Maternal microbiome research in sub-Saharan Africa has focused on non-pregnant and postpartum composition of the vaginal microbiome. Here we aimed to illustrate the relationship between the vaginal microbiome of 99 laboring Ugandan women and intrapartum fever using routine microbiology and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing from two hypervariable regions (V1-V2 and V3-V4). To describe the vaginal microbes associated with vaginal microbial communities, we pursued two approaches: hierarchical clustering methods and a novel Grades of Membership (GoM) modeling approach for vaginal microbiome characterization. Leveraging GoM models, we created a basis composed of a preassigned number of microbial topics whose linear combination optimally represents each patient yielding more comprehensive associations and characterization between maternal clinical features and the microbial communities. Using a random forest model, we showed that by including microbial topic models we improved upon clinical variables to predict maternal fever. Overall, we found a higher prevalence of Granulicatella, Streptococcus, Fusobacterium, Anaerococcus, Sneathia, Clostridium, Gemella, Mobiluncus, and Veillonella genera in febrile mothers, and higher prevalence of Lactobacillus genera (in particular L. crispatus and L. jensenii), Acinobacter, Aerococcus, and Prevotella species in afebrile mothers. By including clinical variables with microbial topics in this model, we observed young maternal age, fever reported earlier in the pregnancy, longer labor duration, and microbial communities with reduced Lactobacillus diversity were associated with intrapartum fever. These results better defined relationships between the presence or absence of intrapartum fever, demographics, peripartum course, and vaginal microbial topics, and expanded our understanding of the impact of the microbiome on maternal and potentially neonatal outcome risk.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34508087 PMCID: PMC8433417 DOI: 10.1038/s41522-021-00244-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes ISSN: 2055-5008 Impact factor: 7.290
Overview clinical characterization of febrile vs. afebrile.
| Characteristic | Afebrile | Febrile | Odds ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total ( | Univariate | ||
| Average temperature at recruitment (mean, SD) | 36.6 (0.3) | 38.3 (0.2) | – |
| Age in years (median, IQR) | 26 (7) | 22 (6.3) | 0.03 (0.00, 0.26) |
| HIV infected | 5 (10%) | 5 (10%) | 1.00 (0.26, 3.83) |
| Parity (mean, SD) | 2.8 (1.9) | 2.3 (2) | 0.61 (0.28,1.32) |
| Self-reported fever in the last 7 days prior to delivery (%) | 4 (6%) | 25 (50%) | 10.56 (3.56, 39.08) |
| Self-reported vaginal infection in last 1 month (%)b | 3 (6%) | 3 (10%) | 1.70 (0.39, 8.71) |
| Intrapartum antimicrobial use (%)c | 2 (4%) | 5 (11%) | 2.82 (0.57, 20.47) |
| Hours in labor (median, IQR) | 18 (38) | 33 (30) | 1.19 (0.98,1.46) |
| Cesarean delivery (%) | 11 (22%) | 24 (48%) | 3.19 (1.36, 7.84) |
| Malaria RDT or blood smear positive in labor (%)d | 4 (8%) | 16 (32%) | 5.05 (1.68, 18.92) |
| Sample collection site (%) | 24 (48%) | 25 (50%) | 1.04 (0.47, 2.30) |
| Maternal CMV viral load (%) | 16 (32%) | 17 (34%) | 1.06 (0.45, 2.47) |
Odds ratio for hours in labor was estimated for every 10 h. The sample site collection was Mbale vs. Mbarara.
IQR interquartile range.
aN = (49,49).
bN = (48,49).
cN = (46,44).
dN = (47,50).
Fig. 1Overall pipeline and structure for 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing (16S rRNA-seq) of maternal vaginal samples.
a Maternal vaginal samples were collected from two hospital sites in Uganda (Mbarara and Mbale) and were categorized by intrapartum fever status. DNA was extracted and samples underwent library preparation and sequencing on two ribosomal hypervariable regions V1–V2 and V3–V4. The sequence output was pre-processed utilizing the QIIME1 pipeline (“Methods”) and samples were further processed for downstream differential abundance (DA) and modeling in concordance with various clinical and technical variables. b Percentage abundance of bacteria on the genus level based on the febrile status of samples. c Mean percent abundance of bacteria (agglomerated on the genus level) by enrollment site. (g_) denotes the bacteria naming based on genus taxonomic level.
Fig. 2Vaginal bacterial community characterization heatmaps of intrapartum Ugandan women through hierarchical clustering.
Vaginal bacterial community classification through selected bacteria after Kruskal–Wallis (KW) test. KW_Communities_V34 are the communities identified by bacteria selected from the KW test. Color of the heatmap represents log10 normalized counts of species and yellow represents zero counts. Annotations are as follows: KW_Communities_V34 is the vaginal community identified from V3–V4 regions through hierarchical clustering followed by bacteria selected by KW test. CMV_Vag represents CMV status of the vaginal samples identified by PCR; LP_Batch is the library preparation batch; Seq_Batch is the sequencing batch, which the samples were processed in; Labor_Fever is the fever status of the laboring woman (see “Methods” for definitions; SSITE is the sample collection site (Mbarara or Mbale).
Fig. 3Structure of vaginal microbiome based on diversity estimates.
a α-Diversity estimation (Shannon, Simpson) jitter boxplot of maternal cohort when fever status is considered utilizing V3–V4 regions (upper and lower quartiles are shown by whiskers and center line represents the median α-diversity). b α-Diversity estimation, jitter boxplot of maternal cohort when sample community assignment is taken into account; CMT denotes community (1–5) (upper and lower quartiles are shown by whiskers and center line represents the median α-diversity). c β-Diversity of maternal sample cohort shown by non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). Samples are colored based on the maternal fever status (febrile, afebrile), goodness of fit stress = 0.2. d β-Diversity of maternal sample cohort by NMDS. Samples are colored by community assignment through hierarchical clustering goodness of fit stress = 0.18.
Fig. 4Differential vaginal bacterial presence in febrile vs. afebrile laboring women utilizing V1–V2 and V3–V4 hypervariable regions.
a Volcano plot representing differentially abundant bacteria in febrile vs. afebrile women using V3–V4 regions. Orange points signify P < 0.05 and labeled red points bacterial OTUs with adjusted P < 0.05 (Bonferroni correction). s_ represent species level and g_ denotes genus level classification of OTUs. b α-Diversity across the V1–V2 vs. V3–V4 assay. c Count per OTU in relevance to assay. d Spearman’s correlations of samples above zero counts in both V1–V2 and V3–V4 regions (OTUs agglomerated at species level). Spearman’s correlation measures are between (−1,1). e Heatmap table of differentially abundant bacterial OTU concordance utilizing V1–V2 and V3–V4 regions from DeSeq2 analysis (P < 0.05) (it is noteworthy that the figure is portrayed in increase and decrease in bacteria with and without covariates (site and community assignment CMT) in the Deseq2 model, respectively.
Fig. 5GoM models and random forest for maternal febrile status prediction.
a Cluster number determination for the data set utilizing the elbow method, which maximized the variance of rate of decline changes as a second derivative. b The sample weight value (ω) of the topic model for the V3–V4 data set. Every row represents a participant’s vaginal swab sample. Every color represents the ratio in which the sample belongs to that particular cluster determined by the model. c Theta (θ) value for every feature (on species taxonomic rank) contributing to the formation of the clusters of GoM models. The heatmap score is a row wise z-score normalized value for every feature in each cluster. d Feature importance for maternal fever status determination utilizing clinical features in addition to topic model clusters and communities identified by hierarchical clustering result of 1000 rounds of random training and test set modeling (CMT 1–5 denote communities identified in hierarchical clustering formatted as binary 1–5 (present absence feature) feature. e Receiver operator curve (ROC) for 1000 rounds of random resampling of training and test set of the RF model for maternal fever status identification using all (both clinical and microbial features), clinical, and microbial features.