Literature DB >> 34505960

Deep Learning: a Promising Method for Histological Class Prediction of Breast Tumors in Mammography.

Raluca-Elena Nica1,2, Mircea-Sebastian Șerbănescu3, Lucian-Mihai Florescu2,4, Georgiana-Cristiana Camen2,4, Costin Teodor Streba5,6, Ioana-Andreea Gheonea2,4.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to determine if the pathology depicted on a mammogram is either benign or malignant (ductal or non-ductal carcinoma) using deep learning and artificial intelligence techniques. A total of 559 patients underwent breast ultrasound, mammography, and ultrasound-guided breast biopsy. Based on the histopathological results, the patients were divided into three categories: benign, ductal carcinomas, and non-ductal carcinomas. The mammograms in the cranio-caudal view underwent pre-processing and segmentation. Given the large variability of the areola, an algorithm was used to remove it and the adjacent skin. Therefore, patients with breast lesions close to the skin were removed. The remaining breast image was resized on the Y axis to a square image and then resized to 512 × 512 pixels. A variable square of 322,622 pixels was searched inside every image to identify the lesion. Each image was rotated with no information loss. For data augmentation, each image was rotated 360 times and a crop of 227 × 227 pixels was saved, resulting in a total of 201,240 images. The reason why our images were cropped at this size is because the deep learning algorithm transfer learning used from AlexNet network has an input image size of 227 × 227. The mean accuracy was 95.8344% ± 6.3720% and mean AUC 0.9910% ± 0.0366%, computed on 100 runs of the algorithm. Based on the results, the proposed solution can be used as a non-invasive and highly accurate computer-aided system based on deep learning that can classify breast lesions based on changes identified on mammograms in the cranio-caudal view.
© 2021. Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Machine learning; Mammography

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34505960      PMCID: PMC8554900          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00508-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.903


  15 in total

1.  Sonoelastography of breast lesions: a prospective study of 215 cases with histopathological correlation.

Authors:  Ioana Andreea Gheonea; Liliana Donoiu; D Camen; Florina Carmen Popescu; Simona Bondari
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.033

Review 2.  Breast cancer in the 21st century: from early detection to new therapies.

Authors:  J A Merino Bonilla; M Torres Tabanera; L H Ros Mendoza
Journal:  Radiologia       Date:  2017-07-14

3.  A deep learning approach for the analysis of masses in mammograms with minimal user intervention.

Authors:  Neeraj Dhungel; Gustavo Carneiro; Andrew P Bradley
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Stand-Alone Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection in Mammography: Comparison With 101 Radiologists.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz; Kristina Lång; Albert Gubern-Merida; Mireille Broeders; Gisella Gennaro; Paola Clauser; Thomas H Helbich; Margarita Chevalier; Tao Tan; Thomas Mertelmeier; Matthew G Wallis; Ingvar Andersson; Sophia Zackrisson; Ritse M Mann; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions.

Authors:  Thijs Kooi; Geert Litjens; Bram van Ginneken; Albert Gubern-Mérida; Clara I Sánchez; Ritse Mann; Ard den Heeten; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective.

Authors:  Aly A Mohamed; Yahong Luo; Hong Peng; Rachel C Jankowitz; Shandong Wu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Anxiety prior to breast biopsy: Relationships with length of time from breast biopsy recommendation to biopsy procedure and psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Melissa A Hayes Balmadrid; Rebecca A Shelby; Anava A Wren; Lauren S Miller; Sora C Yoon; Jay A Baker; Liz A Wildermann; Mary Scott Soo
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2015-09-30

8.  Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables.

Authors:  Aruna Venkatesan; Philip Chu; Karla Kerlikowske; Edward A Sickles; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Differential diagnosis of breast lesions using ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Ioana Andreea Gheonea; Zoia Stoica; Simona Bondari
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2011-10

10.  Deep convolutional neural networks for mammography: advances, challenges and applications.

Authors:  Dina Abdelhafiz; Clifford Yang; Reda Ammar; Sheida Nabavi
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  Covid-19 Pandemic Impact on Breast Cancer Detection-The Major Effects Over an Early Diagnosis.

Authors:  Raluca-Elena Nica; Georgiana-Cristiana Camen; Mircea-Sebastian Şerbănescu; Lucian-Mihai Florescu; Ioana-Andreea Gheonea
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2021-12-31

2.  Deep learning with transfer learning in pathology. Case study: classification of basal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Raluca Maria Bungărdean; Mircea Sebastian Şerbănescu; Costin Teodor Streba; Maria Crişan
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.833

3.  Federated Learning Approach with Pre-Trained Deep Learning Models for COVID-19 Detection from Unsegmented CT images.

Authors:  Lucian Mihai Florescu; Costin Teodor Streba; Mircea-Sebastian Şerbănescu; Mădălin Mămuleanu; Dan Nicolae Florescu; Rossy Vlăduţ Teică; Raluca Elena Nica; Ioana Andreea Gheonea
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.