Literature DB >> 28932980

Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective.

Aly A Mohamed1, Yahong Luo2, Hong Peng1,3, Rachel C Jankowitz4,5, Shandong Wu6,7,8.   

Abstract

Mammographic breast density has been established as an independent risk marker for developing breast cancer. Breast density assessment is a routine clinical need in breast cancer screening and current standard is using the Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS) criteria including four qualitative categories (i.e., fatty, scattered density, heterogeneously dense, or extremely dense). In each mammogram examination, a breast is typically imaged with two different views, i.e., the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view and cranial caudal (CC) view. The BI-RADS-based breast density assessment is a qualitative process made by visual observation of both the MLO and CC views by radiologists, where there is a notable inter- and intra-reader variability. In order to maintain consistency and accuracy in BI-RADS-based breast density assessment, gaining understanding on radiologists' reading behaviors will be educational. In this study, we proposed to leverage the newly emerged deep learning approach to investigate how the MLO and CC view images of a mammogram examination may have been clinically used by radiologists in coming up with a BI-RADS density category. We implemented a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning model, aimed at distinguishing the breast density categories using a large (15,415 images) set of real-world clinical mammogram images. Our results showed that the classification of density categories (in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) using MLO view images is significantly higher than that using the CC view. This indicates that most likely it is the MLO view that the radiologists have predominately used to determine the breast density BI-RADS categories. Our study holds a potential to further interpret radiologists' reading characteristics, enhance personalized clinical training to radiologists, and ultimately reduce reader variations in breast density assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast density; Deep learning; Digital mammography; Radiology; Reading behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28932980      PMCID: PMC6113143          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-0022-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  11 in total

1.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment.

Authors:  W A Berg; C Campassi; P Langenberg; M J Sexton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  A CNN Regression Approach for Real-Time 2D/3D Registration.

Authors:  Z Jane Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 3.  Applications and literature review of the BI-RADS classification.

Authors:  S Obenauer; K P Hermann; E Grabbe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  ROC methodology in radiologic imaging.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Unsupervised Deep Learning Applied to Breast Density Segmentation and Mammographic Risk Scoring.

Authors:  Michiel Kallenberg; Kersten Petersen; Mads Nielsen; Andrew Y Ng; Christian Igel; Celine M Vachon; Katharina Holland; Rikke Rass Winkel; Nico Karssemeijer; Martin Lillholm
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Mammographic density-a review on the current understanding of its association with breast cancer.

Authors:  C W Huo; G L Chew; K L Britt; W V Ingman; M A Henderson; J L Hopper; E W Thompson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning.

Authors:  Hoo-Chang Shin; Holger R Roth; Mingchen Gao; Le Lu; Ziyue Xu; Isabella Nogues; Jianhua Yao; Daniel Mollura; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis with Deep Learning Architecture: Applications to Breast Lesions in US Images and Pulmonary Nodules in CT Scans.

Authors:  Jie-Zhi Cheng; Dong Ni; Yi-Hong Chou; Jing Qin; Chui-Mei Tiu; Yeun-Chung Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Dinggang Shen; Chung-Ming Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

1.  Prediction of reader estimates of mammographic density using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Georgia V Ionescu; Martin Fergie; Michael Berks; Elaine F Harkness; Johan Hulleman; Adam R Brentnall; Jack Cuzick; D Gareth Evans; Susan M Astley
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-01-31

Review 2.  CAD and AI for breast cancer-recent development and challenges.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Ravi K Samala; Lubomir M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Deep Learning: a Promising Method for Histological Class Prediction of Breast Tumors in Mammography.

Authors:  Raluca-Elena Nica; Mircea-Sebastian Șerbănescu; Lucian-Mihai Florescu; Georgiana-Cristiana Camen; Costin Teodor Streba; Ioana-Andreea Gheonea
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.903

4.  Deep learning modeling using normal mammograms for predicting breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Dooman Arefan; Aly A Mohamed; Wendie A Berg; Margarita L Zuley; Jules H Sumkin; Shandong Wu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence and convolution neural networks assessing mammographic images: a narrative literature review.

Authors:  Dennis Jay Wong; Ziba Gandomkar; Wan-Jing Wu; Guijing Zhang; Wushuang Gao; Xiaoying He; Yunuo Wang; Warren Reed
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-03-05

Review 6.  The Right Direction Needed to Develop White-Box Deep Learning in Radiology, Pathology, and Ophthalmology: A Short Review.

Authors:  Yoichi Hayashi
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2019-04-16

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence in mammographic phenotyping of breast cancer risk: a narrative review.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Shyam Desai; Vinayak S Ahluwalia; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 8.408

8.  Evolution of research trends in artificial intelligence for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis over the past two decades: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Asif Hassan Syed; Tabrej Khan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.