| Literature DB >> 34504910 |
Kenji Fukushima1, Noriko Itaba2, Yohei Kono2, Shizuma Okazaki2, Shinpei Enokida3, Naomi Kuranobu1, Jun Murakami1, Makoto Enokida3, Hideki Nagashima3, Susumu Kanzaki1,4, Noriyuki Namba1, Goshi Shiota2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Transplantation of IC-2-engineered bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell (BM-MSC) sheets (IC-2 sheets) was previously reported to potentially reduce liver fibrosis.Entities:
Keywords: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BM-MSCs, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells; C3, complement C3; CCl4, carbon tetrachloride; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; EDTA, ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid; FACS, Fluorescence-activated cell sorter; FALD, fontan-associated liver disease; GAPDH, Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HCC, hepatic cellular carcinoma; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; HSCs, hepatic stellate cells; Hepatic cell sheets; IgG, immunoglobulin G; LC, liver cirrhosis; MMP-14, matrix metalloproteinase; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; Matrix metalloproteinase-14; Mesenchymal stem cells; Wnt/β-catenin signal inhibitor; chronic liver injury; hBM-MNCs, human bone marrow mononuclear cells; iPS cells, induced pluripotent stem cells; αSMA, α-smooth muscle actin
Year: 2021 PMID: 34504910 PMCID: PMC8399086 DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2021.08.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regen Ther ISSN: 2352-3204 Impact factor: 3.419
Fig. 1Characterization of cell surface markers of MSCs by flow cytometry. (a) Representative histogram of the FACS of cell surface marker expression on BM-MSCs used in the present study. BM-MSCs from Lonza 22, Lonza 26, and Lonza 30 at passage 3 were labeled with FITC-coupled antibodies against CD34, CD45, CD90, CD105, and HLA-DR. Shaded areas indicated staining with antibodies against the indicat antigens, and solid lines indicate background fluorescence stained with isotype control. (b) Grouped bar chart showing quantitation of cell surface markers on each lot of three donors-derived BM-MSCs. The data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent FACS analyses. (c) The growth curve of the ten lots of BM-MSCs from L21 (Lonza 21) to L30 (Lonza 30). Cell culture was started at a cell density of 5.0 × 103 to 1.0 × 104 cells/cm2 (P0) and passaged every 3–4 days to P1, P2, and P3.
Fig. 2Regression of liver fibrosis by IC-2 sheets. (a) Micrographs of liver sections subjected to Azan staining. The individual number of the mouse (lot number of the cell sheet) is described on the left side of each micrograph (scale bar = 100 μm). (b) Sirius Red staining (scale bar = 100 μm). (c) The proportions of Azan-stained fibrotic areas of two groups (4–5 fields per each mouse in 3 mice were measured). (d) The proportions of Sirius Red-stained fibrotic areas of two groups (4–5 fields per mouse in 3 mice were measured). (e) Hydroxyproline contents in the liver. The number of mice examined in the sham, sheets, and CCl₄(−) groups were 22, 26, and 3, respectively. ∗P < 0.05 examined by Steel test. (f) α-SMA expression in recipient liver tissues was measured by western blotting. Sham and sheets represent the sham and IC-2 sheets groups, respectively. (g) Serum aspartic aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and total bilirubin were shown. The number of mice examined in the sham, sheets, and CCl₄(−) groups was 22, 26, and 3, respectively, except 24 of the total bilirubin in the sheets group. The results are expressed as mean ± S.D. ∗∗P < 0.01 examined by Student's t-test.
Univariate analysis between hepatic hydroxyproline contents and cell sheets-secreted factors.
| Parameter | Univariate analysis | |
|---|---|---|
| β-value | ||
| MMP-1 (fg/cell) | −0.214 | 0.351 |
| MMP-2 activity (fg/cell) | −0.338 | 0.135 |
| MMP-13 activity (fg/cell) | −0.331 | 0.143 |
| MMP-14 (fg/cell) | −0.578 | 0.012∗ |
| Thioredoxin (fg/cell) | −0.006 | 0.98 |
| Amphiregulin (fg/cell) | −0.215 | 0.349 |
| C3 (pg/cell) | −0.226 | 0.325 |
MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; ∗P < 0.05.
Fig. 3Secreted MMP-14 from IC-2 sheets is inversely correlated with hepatic hydroxyproline contents. Secreted MMP-14 contents in the conditioned media during manufacturing IC-2 sheets from days 4–7 were measured and expressed as per cell. Hepatic hydroxyproline contents at 7 days after transplantation were analyzed.
Univariate analysis between hepatic hydroxyproline contents and factors in lysates of cell sheets.
| Parameter | Univariate analysis | |
|---|---|---|
| β- value | ||
| MMP-1 activity (RFU/cell) | −0.238 | 0.299 |
| MMP-2 activity (fg/cell) | −0.266 | 0.245 |
| MMP-13 activity (fg/cell) | −0.482 | 0.043∗ |
| MMP-14 activity (RFU/cell) | −0.380 | 0.089 |
| Thioredoxin (fg/cell) | −0.516 | 0.017∗ |
MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; RFU, relative fluorescence units; ∗P < 0.05.
Fig. 4Cell viability and Wnt/β-catenin signal intensity in response to IC-2. (a) Cell viability by WST assay in various concentrations of IC-2 (n = 3). Mean ± SD, ∗P < 0.05, and ∗∗P < 0.01 compared with 0.1% DMSO, examined by Dunnett's test. (b) Wnt/β-catenin signal intensity in response to various concentrations of IC-2 by reporter assay (n = 3). Mean ± SD, ∗P < 0.05, and ∗∗P < 0.01 compared with 0.1% DMSO, examined by Dunnett's test. Relative luciferase activity was expressed as corrected firefly luciferase activity with the internal control renilla luciferase activity calculated against 0.1% DMSO.
Fig. 5MMP-14 in response IC-2 in BM-MSCs from the elderly. (a) Secreted MMP-14 in the culture supernatant of BM-MSCs from the elderly in IC-2-contained medium (n = 3). The supernatants of 3 days culture (day 4–7) and 2 days culture (day 7–9) culture were collected from BM-MSCs at 7 and 9 days after IC-2 treatments, respectively. Mean ± SD, ∗P < 0.05, and ∗∗P < 0.01 compared with DMSO (+) examined by Dunnett's test. (b) Intracellular MMP-14 contents of BM-MSCs from the elderly with IC-2 treatment (n = 3). Cells were harvested and examined at end point of culture (day 9). Mean ± SD, ∗P < 0.05, and ∗∗P < 0.01 compared with DMSO (+) examined by Dunnett's test. (c) MMP-14 mRNA expression of BM-MSCs from the elderly after IC-2 treatment (n = 3). Mean ± SD, ∗P < 0.05, and ∗∗P < 0.01 compared to DMSO treatment, examined by Dunnett's test.