| Literature DB >> 34503492 |
Hemakumar M Reddy1,2, Rupa Bhattacharya1,3, Shrish Tiwari1, Kankadeb Mishra1,4, Pranatharthi Annapurna1,5, Zeenath Jehan1,6, Nissankararao Mary Praveena1, Jomini Liza Alex1, Vishnu M Dhople1,7, Lalji Singh1, Mahadevan Sivaramakrishnan1,8, Anurag Chaturvedi1,9, Nandini Rangaraj1, Thomas Michael Shiju1,10, Badanapuram Sreedevi1, Sachin Kumar1, Ram Reddy Dereddi1,11, Sunayana M Rayabandla1,12, Rachel A Jesudasan13,14,15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deciphering the functions of Y chromosome in mammals has been slow owing to the presence of repeats. Some of these repeats transcribe coding RNAs, the roles of which have been studied. Functions of the noncoding transcripts from Y chromosomal repeats however, remain unclear. While a majority of the genes expressed during spermatogenesis are autosomal, mice with different deletions of the long arm of the Y chromosome (Yq) were previously also shown to be characterized by subfertility, sterility and sperm abnormalities, suggesting the presence of effectors of spermatogenesis at this location. Here we report a set of novel noncoding RNAs from mouse Yq and explore their connection to some of the autosomal genes expressed in testis.Entities:
Keywords: Alternative splicing; Autosomal gene regulation; Comparative sperm proteomics; Long noncoding RNA; Male sterility; Mouse Y chromosome; Pirmy; Pirmy-like RNAs; piRNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34503492 PMCID: PMC8428117 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-021-01125-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biol ISSN: 1741-7007 Impact factor: 7.431
Fig. 1Analysis of M34 (DQ907163) and identification of a novel noncoding RNA. A Localization by FISH of the genomic clone, M34 to mouse Y long arm in multiple copies spanning its entire length. B Mouse genome map view of M34 BLAST hits (NCBI build 38.1), showing Y chromosomal localization further indicating male-specificity of these repeats. C Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using M34 elicits signals in adult mouse testis. Green fluorescence represents signal from M34, nuclei are counterstained with Propidium iodide (red). Yellow indicates co-localization. D Hybridization of M34 onto RNase-treated testis sections does not show signals, indicating that the signals in panel C are due to the presence of M34-derived RNA E Sequence analysis of the 9.5 kb M34 shows presence of incomplete copies of different repeats like long terminal repeats (LTRs), long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs), short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs), endogenous retroviral sequences (ERVK) and simple sequence repeats in both direct and reverse orientations in the clone. ESTs matching to M34 are marked as dotted arrows at the 3′ end. ES cell EST (CA533654) was used as the probe to identify Pirmy. F Y-specific localization of Pirmy cDNA clone (DQ907162) on a mouse metaphase spread by FISH, showing the presence of multiple copies. G Partial homology between Sly and Pirmy (DQ907162), indicating identification of a novel cDNA. Homology region is highlighted in green rectangles. Purple arrow shows the homology to M34. H The consensus splice signal sequences (AG/GT) at all intron- exon junctions of DQ907162 (see also Data Sheet)
Fig. 2Identification of multiple splice variants of Pirmy. A RT-PCR amplification of Pirmy showed multiple amplicons in both testis and brain. The RT-PCR products from testis were cloned and sequenced to identify the splice variants. NTC is the non-template control. Bottom panel shows Gapdh control for checking the integrity and quality of RNA. B Colour coded line diagram showing extensive alternative splicing of Pirmy. The 80 splice variants (DQ907162, FJ541103-FJ541181) depicted here localize to Y: 4341127-4381724 (GRC m39). Each exon is represented by the same colour in different isoforms. Sizes of the exons are to scale. Top two lines show the representation of all exons present at this locus according to their order in the genomic sequence as e1, e2, etc. Line 2 indicates the nucleotide positions of each exon in a scenario where all the exons are present. The exons have been arranged in linear order. C BLAST analysis against mouse genome localizes the splice variants of Pirmy to NT_166343.2
Fig. 3Representation of 28 Pirmy-like RNAs (FJ541075-FJ541102). Top two lines show the representation of all exons present together according to their order in the Pirmy-like RNAs as e1, e2, etc. Putative nucleotide positions in a scenario wherein all the exons are present are indicated. Different Pirmy-like RNAs have been arranged in linear order. Exons in dashed lines are specific to these 28 Pirmy-like RNAs, whereas other exons are common to Pirmy splice variants (Fig. 2) and the Pirmy-like RNAs
Fig. 4Sperm proteins are deregulated in XYRIIIqdel mice. A Sperm lysates from the wild type XYRIII strain and the mutant XYRIIIqdel mice were separated by 2D-PAGE in the pI ranges of 4–7 and 5–8 on 8–20% gradient gels (see also Additional file 10: Fig. S5A). Five differentially expressed proteins, D1 to D5 - Calreticulin, SPINK2 variant 2, SPINK2 variant 3, SOD and FABP9 respectively, were identified by mass spectrometry analysis in the 4–7 pI range, of which 4 were upregulated (upward arrow) and one downregulated (downward arrow). Three proteins, A, B and C—spot A, SDF2L1 and MAST were not detectable in the 5–8 pI range in XYRIIIqdel compared to the XYRIII sperm lysate. B List of the differentially expressed proteins identified in the proteomics screen is given in the table along with MS tags and N-terminal sequences. Genes corresponding to all the differentially expressed proteins in XYRIIIqdel localized to different autosomes
Fig. 5Localization of Pirmy transcripts to UTRs of deregulated genes. Panel A shows the UTR regions of the deregulated genes identified in the proteomics screen with the sequences homologous to Pirmy and Pirmy-like RNAs highlighted in red. Both +/+ and +/− homologies are observed. The splice isoforms of Pirmy and Pirmy-like RNAs are indicated in brown and the gene names in green colour. Seven homologous stretches were found in the 3′UTR of the spot A hypothetical protein. B Two deregulated genes (aromatase and caldendrin) were identified independent of the proteomics screen, which also harbour homology to Pirmy-like RNAs. C Acrosin identified from literature survey also harbours homologies to Pirmy and Pirmy-like RNAs. Acrosin harboured four homologous stretches in its 3′UTR
Fig. 6Identification of piRNAs in Pirmy and Pirmy-like transcripts. A Short stretches of homology identified in the UTRs are represented on the set of 28 Pirmy-like RNAs. The boxes highlighted in black match within exons and boxes highlighted in red match the exon-exon junctions. Line 1 indicates the nucleotide positions as in Fig. 3. B Pie chart shows ~ 81% of the matches within exons and ~ 19% at exon-exon junctions. C Use of sequences homologous to 3′ UTRs of a hypothetical protein (SpotA4), Sod, Bche, PLA2G12B and Spn as probes (Additional file 13: Fig. S6) on small RNA northern blots (3 experiments) shows testis-specific signals of ~ 30 nt size (indicated by arrows), which correspond to the size of piRNAs. Control blot using a scrambled oligonucleotide probe shows no signal at ~ 30 nt size. D Hybridization using probes from sense (S) and antisense (AS) strands of Sod and Bche (Additional file 13: Fig. S6) shows differential transcription from the two strands under identical conditions. Lower panels in C, D show loading control using U6 probe (B—brain, K—kidney, T—testis, Ladder—decade marker). E, F EMSA using RNA oligonucleotide sequences from FJ541077 (E) and FJ541118 (F) that have homology to UTRs of the genes of hypothetical protein spot A (A4) and Sod respectively. These oligonucleotides and piR1, a known piRNA, showed the shift in mobility with recombinant MIWI protein. Gel shifts obtained with RNA oligonucleotides from spotA4 and Sod were competed out by cold piR1 and vice versa. Pre-incubation with MIWI antibody abolished the gel shift whereas pre-incubation with argonaute 3 antibody (ARG) did not, indicating specificity of binding. The small RNA northern blots, EMSA experiments were repeated three times each. G Schematic representation of 3′UTR reporter constructs. H The concentration-dependent reduction in luciferase expression when target UTRs of Sod and PLA2G12B are treated with antagopirs (0–20 nM). A non-target UTR (Cdc2l1) did not show a difference (n = 3; *** P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05)
| Forward | 5′GTG CGG TTG TGA AGG TGT TC3′ | |
|---|---|---|
Forward Reverse | 5′ACG GGA AGC TCA CTG GCA TGG3′ 5′CAA CAG CGA CAC CCA CTC CTC3′ |
| Sr. No | Antibody | Primary antibody dilution | Secondary antibody dilution |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | SOD | 1:2000 | 1:3000 |
| 2. | FABP9 | 1:3000 along with 1/20 blocking agent | 1:5000 along with 1/50 blocking agent |
| Riken cDNA 1700001 L19 (Q9DAR0) (A) | Forward reverse | 5′CGA GGG CCA GAC AGG GAT TG3′ |
|---|---|---|
| Forward reverse | 5′ACT TCC CGT CGC CGC TAT C-3′ 5′TGA CCG ACA GGA ACA CAG AGG3′ | |
| Forward reverse | 5′CAG CAT CGA GCA GAA GTA TAA GC3′ 5′TGG GTG GAG TTA TTG CAG TAG3′ | |
| Calreticulin (D1) | Forward reverse | 5′GGA AAC CAC GTC AAA TTG 3′ 5′-GGT GAT GAG GAA ATT GTC-3′ |
| Forward reverse | 5′GGC TAC TTG ACC ACT GC3′ 5′TTT GAG AAT CGG AAG AGT C3′ | |
| Forward reverse | 5′TTC CGA ACA CCA GAC TG3′ 5′ATG GCT ACC GTC CTC C3′ | |
| Forward reverse | 5′TGA AGT CGC AGG AGA CAA CCT3′ 5′ATG GCC TTC CGT GTT CCT A3′ |