| Literature DB >> 34500834 |
Fenghua Kang1,2,3, Sha Zhang1,2,3, Dekun Chen1,2,3, Jianbing Tan1,2,3, Min Kuang1,2,3, Jinlin Zhang1,2,3, Guangyuan Zeng1,2,3, Kangping Xu1,2,3, Zhenxing Zou1,2,3, Guishan Tan1,2,3.
Abstract
Four new biflavonoids (1-4) were isolated from Selaginella doederleinii together with a known biflavonoid derivative (5). Their structures contained a rare linker of individual flavones to each other by direct C-3-O-C-4''' bonds, and were elucidated by extensive spectroscopic data, including HRESIMS, NMR and ECD data. All isolates significantly inhibited the proliferation of NSCLC cells (IC50 = 2.3-8.4 μM) with low toxicity to non-cancer MRC-5 cells, superior to the clinically used drug DDP. Furthermore, the most active compound 3 suppressed XIAP and survivin expression, promoted upregulation of caspase-3/cleaved-caspase-3, as well as induced cell apoptosis and cycle arrest in A549 cells. Together, our findings suggest that 3 may be worth studying further for intervention of NSCLC.Entities:
Keywords: Selaginella doederleinii; antiproliferative activity; apoptosis; biflavonoid; cell cycle
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34500834 PMCID: PMC8434134 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26175401
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structures of compounds 1–5.
1H NMR spectral data for compounds 1–4 in DMSO-d6 (δ in ppm, and J in Hz).
| Position | 1 a | 2 a | 3 a | 4 b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 6.24, d (2.0) | 6.05, d (2.0) | 6.26, d (2.0) | 6.24, d (1.6) |
| 8 | 6.54, d (2.0) | 6.32, d (2.0) | 6.55, d (2.0) | 6.54, d (1.6) |
| 7-OCH3 | 3.87, s | |||
| 2′/6′ | 7.87, d (8.5) | 7.78, d (9.0) | 7.84, d (9.0) | 7.87, d (8.8) |
| 3′/5′ | 6.89, d (8.5) | 6.84, d (9.0) | 6.89, d (9.0) | 6.89, d (8.8) |
| 2″ | 5.50, dd (13.0, 3.0) | 5.46, dd (12.8, 2.4) | ||
| 3″ | 3.26, dd (17.0, 3.0) | 6.77, s | 6.95, s | 3.24, dd (16.8, 2.4) |
| 2.71, dd (17.0, 3.0) | 2.72, dd, (16.8, 2.4) | |||
| 6″ | 5.89, d (2.0) | 6.40, d (2.0) | ||
| 8″ | 5.90, d (2.0) | 6.43, s | 6.78, d (2.0) | 5.99, s |
| 6″-CH3 | 1.97, s | 1.88, s | ||
| 2′′′/6′′′ | 7.45, d (8.5) | 7.95, d (8.5) | 8.04, d (9.0) | 7.44, d (8.8) |
| 3′′′/5′′′ | 7.10, d (8.5) | 7.19, d (8.5) | 7.27, d (9.0) | 7.10, d (8.8) |
| 5-OH | 12.30, s | 12.21, br s | 12.24, s | 12.31, br s |
| 7-OH | 10.96, br s | 10.89, br s | ||
| 4′-OH | 10.37, br s | 10.38, br s | 10.39, br s | |
| 5″-OH | 12.14, s | 13.07, br s | 12.88, s | 12.40, s |
| 7″-OH | 10.82, br s | 11.04, br s | 10.89, br s |
a Measured at 500 MHz; b Measured at 800 MHz.
13C NMR spectral data for compounds 1–4 in DMSO-d6.
| Position | 1 a | 2 a | 3 a | 4 b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 160.7 | 161.5 | 160.8 | 161.1 |
| 3 | 132.1 | 131.8 | 131.8 | 132.4 |
| 4 | 176.4 | 175.6 | 176.1 | 176.8 |
| 5 | 161.3 | 161.5 | 161.3 | 161.6 |
| 6 | 99.0 | 100.7 | 99.1 | 99.3 |
| 7 | 164.6 | 163.2 | 164.7 | 165.0 |
| 8 | 94.2 | 95.3 | 93.0 | 94.6 |
| 9 | 156.9 | 156.6 | 156.9 | 157.2 |
| 10 | 104.3 | 104.4 | 104.3 | 104.6 |
| 7-OCH3 | 56.2 | |||
| 1′ | 120.0 | 120.0 | 119.9 | 120.3 |
| 2′/6′ | 130.3 | 130.4 | 130.3 | 130.6 |
| 3′/5′ | 115.9 | 116.3 | 115.9 | 116.2 |
| 4′ | 157.1 | 155.8 | 157.2 | 157.5 |
| 2″ | 78.2 | 162.6 | 163.5 | 78.5 |
| 3″ | 42.1 | 104.4 | 104.5 | 42.5 |
| 4″ | 196.2 | 181.7 | 182.2 | 196.7 |
| 5″ | 163.6 | 158.8 | 161.3 | 161.2 |
| 6″ | 96.0 | 107.8 | 98.2 | 103.8 |
| 7″ | 166.8 | 165.4 | 165.4 | 165.1 |
| 8″ | 95.1 | 93.8 | 94.4 | 94.7 |
| 9″ | 163.0 | 157.6 | 157.5 | 160.7 |
| 10″ | 101.9 | 103.3 | 104.9 | 101.9 |
| 6″-CH3 | 8.0 | 7.4 | ||
| 1′′′ | 132.7 | 125.5 | 125.0 | 133.2 |
| 2′′′/6′′′ | 128.6 | 128.7 | 128.8 | 128.9 |
| 3′′′/5′′′ | 115.1 | 116.1 | 115.9 | 115.4 |
| 4′′′ | 157.1 | 160.0 | 159.8 | 157.2 |
a Measured at 125 MHz; b Measured at 200 MHz.
Figure 2CD spectrum of compound 1 (in MeOH).
Figure 3Key 1H-1H COSY and HMBC correlations of compounds 1–4.
Figure 4CD spectrum of compound 4 (in MeOH).
Antiproliferative activity of compounds 1–5.
| Compounds | IC50 (μM) a | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| A549 | H1299 | MRC-5 | |
|
| 3.1 c,d | 7.3 c,d | >100 |
|
| 2.8 c,d | 7.3 c,d | >100 |
|
| 2.3 c,d | 4.0 c,d | >100 |
|
| 3.1 c,d | 6.8 c,d | 58.2 |
|
| 7.9 c,d | 8.4 c,d | 36.8 |
| DDP b | 13.3 | 24.5 | 49.0 |
a IC50 values represent the mean of independent triplicate experiments (n = 3), and the statistically significant differences were analyzed using Mann-Whitney; b DDP: Cis-platin used as a positive control; c p < 0.001 vs the DDP group; d p < 0.001 vs the MRC-5 group.
Figure 5Antiproliferative activity of compounds 1–5 against two NSCLC cell lines (A549 and H1299) as well as non-cancer MRC-5 cells.
Figure 6Morphological changes of A549 cells. (A) The cell lines were exposed to equimolar (3 μM) concentration of compounds 1–3, following 24 h treatment, versus control group (untreated cells). Scale bars, 50 μm. White arrows show the apoptosis cells. (B) Quantitative analysis of live cells. Data are expressed as means from three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001 vs the 0 h group.
Figure 7Compounds 1–3 induced A549 cell apoptosis. (A) The representational pictures of flow cytometry in cell apoptosis with or without indicated compound 3 μM for 24 h. (B) Apoptosis rates of compounds 1–3 as well as control group. (C) The expression of apoptosis related proteins after the treatment of compound 1–3 for 24 h by Western blot assay. Data are expressed as means of the percentages of apoptotic cells from three independent experiments. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs control group.
Figure 8Effects of compounds 1–3 on expression of XIAP and survivin. A549 cells were treated with vehicle or the indicated compound for 24 h, and the relative levels of XIAP and survivin were determined by Western blot assays using GAPDH as a control. (A) Representative expression of XIAP and survivin. (B) Quantitative analysis of XIAP. (C) Quantitative analysis of survivin. Data are expressed as means from three independent experiments. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs control group.
Figure 9Cell cycle analysis of A549 cells after treatment with compound 3. After 24 h of treatment, cells were labeled with PI (Propidium Iodide) and cell cycle analysis was performed using flow cytometry. (A) Representative histograms. (B) Quantitative analysis. Data are expressed as means from three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001 vs control group.