| Literature DB >> 34498494 |
Zhebin Yu1,2, Susan Peters1, Loes van Boxmeer3, George S Downward1,4, Gerard Hoek1, Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou5, Marc G Weisskopf6,7, Johnni Hansen8, Leonard H van den Berg3, Roel C H Vermeulen1,4.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34498494 PMCID: PMC8428046 DOI: 10.1289/EHP9131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Association between long-term exposure to air pollution and ALS in single-pollutant models.
| Exposure (IQR) | Average exposure level | OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case ( | Control ( | |||
|
|
| 1.10 (1.04, 1.16) | 0.001 | |
|
|
| 1.05 (0.92, 1.10) | 0.153 | |
|
|
| 1.06 (1.00, 1.12) |
| |
|
|
| 1.19 (1.10, 1.28) |
| |
|
|
| 1.25 (1.15, 1.34) |
| |
|
|
| 1.14 (1.07, 1.22) |
| |
| UFPs (1,240) |
|
| 1.11 (1.05, 1.16) |
|
|
|
| 1.18 (1.10, 1.27) |
| |
|
|
| 1.08 (1.02, 1.15) | 0.019 | |
|
|
| 1.22 (1.13, 1.31) |
| |
|
|
| 1.16 (1.09, 1.24) |
| |
|
|
| 0.98 (0.90, 1.07) | 0.764 | |
|
|
| 1.09 (1.02, 1.17) | 0.008 | |
|
|
| 1.15 (1.05, 1.25) | 0.004 | |
|
|
| 1.17 (1.07, 1.28) | 0.001 | |
|
|
| 1.10 (1.02, 1.18) | 0.021 | |
|
|
| 1.08 (1.01, 1.15) | 0.034 | |
|
|
| 1.12 (1.05, 1.19) | 0.003 | |
|
|
| 1.18 (1.11, 1.25) |
| |
|
|
| 1.15 (1.05, 1.25) | 0.004 | |
|
|
| 1.14 (1.05, 1.23) | 0.004 | |
|
|
| 0.96 (0.88, 1.04) | 0.315 | |
|
|
| 0.99 (0.91, 1.08) | 0.857 | |
| OP ESR (171.9) |
|
| 1.14 (1.06, 1.23) | 0.032 |
| OP DTT (0.2) |
|
| 1.01 (0.93, 1.09) | 0.343 |
Note: ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; CI, confidence interval; Cu, copper; Fe, iron; IQR, interquartile range; K, potassium; Ni, nickel; , nitrogen dioxide; , nitrogen oxides; , particulate matter with aerodynamic ; , particulate matter with aerodynamic ; , ; , particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter between and ; OP DTT, oxidative potential metric with dithiothreitol; OP ESR, oxidative potential metric with electron spin resonance; OR, odds ratio; S, sulfur; SES, socioeconomic status; Si, silicon; UFPs, ultrafine particles; V, vanadium; Zn, zinc.
Units are for , , , and ; for absorbance; particle for UFPs; for all PM elemental constituents; atomic units for OP ESR; and mol for OP DTT.
Results were adjusted for sex, age (age in y at diagnosis for cases and at recruitment for controls), education level, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and area SES using unconditional logistic regression models; ORs are presented as per IQR increment.
-Values corrected for multiple testing using Benjamini and Hochberg method (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995) are presented.
Figure 1.Two-pollutant model with the main effects of PM mass, absorbance, , , UFPs, PM OP, and PM elemental compositions. The x-axis represents the estimate of certain air pollution constituents, the y-axis represents the pollutants adjusted in the two-pollutant models. All results were adjusted for sex, age, education level, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and area SES using unconditional logistic regression models. The model adjusted for and is difficult to interpret because is the sum of these two. The models including both and are also difficult to interpret because is included in . Red dots stand for single-pollutant models; blue triangles stand for two-pollutant models. Numeric data of this figure are presented in supporting information at https://github.com/kevininef/Airpollution-ALS. Note: Cu, copper; Fe, iron; K, potassium; Ni, nickel; , nitrogen dioxide; , nitrogen oxides; OP DTT, oxidative potential metric with dithiothreitol; OP ESR, oxidative potential metric with electron spin resonance; PM, particulate matter; , particulate matter with aerodynamic ; , particulate matter with aerodynamic ; , ; , particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter between and ; PM OP, particulate matter oxidative potential; S, sulfur; SES, socioeconomic status; Si, silicon; UFPs, ultrafine particles; V, vanadium; Zn, zinc.