Literature DB >> 22963366

Development of Land Use Regression models for PM(2.5), PM(2.5) absorbance, PM(10) and PM(coarse) in 20 European study areas; results of the ESCAPE project.

Marloes Eeftens1, Rob Beelen, Kees de Hoogh, Tom Bellander, Giulia Cesaroni, Marta Cirach, Christophe Declercq, Audrius Dėdelė, Evi Dons, Audrey de Nazelle, Konstantina Dimakopoulou, Kirsten Eriksen, Grégoire Falq, Paul Fischer, Claudia Galassi, Regina Gražulevičienė, Joachim Heinrich, Barbara Hoffmann, Michael Jerrett, Dirk Keidel, Michal Korek, Timo Lanki, Sarah Lindley, Christian Madsen, Anna Mölter, Gizella Nádor, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Michael Nonnemacher, Xanthi Pedeli, Ole Raaschou-Nielsen, Evridiki Patelarou, Ulrich Quass, Andrea Ranzi, Christian Schindler, Morgane Stempfelet, Euripides Stephanou, Dorothea Sugiri, Ming-Yi Tsai, Tarja Yli-Tuomi, Mihály J Varró, Danielle Vienneau, Stephanie von Klot, Kathrin Wolf, Bert Brunekreef, Gerard Hoek.   

Abstract

Land Use Regression (LUR) models have been used increasingly for modeling small-scale spatial variation in air pollution concentrations and estimating individual exposure for participants of cohort studies. Within the ESCAPE project, concentrations of PM(2.5), PM(2.5) absorbance, PM(10), and PM(coarse) were measured in 20 European study areas at 20 sites per area. GIS-derived predictor variables (e.g., traffic intensity, population, and land-use) were evaluated to model spatial variation of annual average concentrations for each study area. The median model explained variance (R(2)) was 71% for PM(2.5) (range across study areas 35-94%). Model R(2) was higher for PM(2.5) absorbance (median 89%, range 56-97%) and lower for PM(coarse) (median 68%, range 32- 81%). Models included between two and five predictor variables, with various traffic indicators as the most common predictors. Lower R(2) was related to small concentration variability or limited availability of predictor variables, especially traffic intensity. Cross validation R(2) results were on average 8-11% lower than model R(2). Careful selection of monitoring sites, examination of influential observations and skewed variable distributions were essential for developing stable LUR models. The final LUR models are used to estimate air pollution concentrations at the home addresses of participants in the health studies involved in ESCAPE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22963366     DOI: 10.1021/es301948k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  208 in total

1.  Air quality, stroke, and coronary events: results of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study from the Ruhr Region.

Authors:  Barbara Hoffmann; Gudrun Weinmayr; Frauke Hennig; Kateryna Fuks; Susanne Moebus; Christian Weimar; Nico Dragano; Dirk M Hermann; Hagen Kälsch; Amir A Mahabadi; Raimund Erbel; Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Exposure assessment models for elemental components of particulate matter in an urban environment: A comparison of regression and random forest approaches.

Authors:  Cole Brokamp; Roman Jandarov; M B Rao; Grace LeMasters; Patrick Ryan
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Applying land use regression model to estimate spatial variation of PM₂.₅ in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Jiansheng Wu; Jiacheng Li; Jian Peng; Weifeng Li; Guang Xu; Chengcheng Dong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Expert position paper on air pollution and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  David E Newby; Pier M Mannucci; Grethe S Tell; Andrea A Baccarelli; Robert D Brook; Ken Donaldson; Francesco Forastiere; Massimo Franchini; Oscar H Franco; Ian Graham; Gerard Hoek; Barbara Hoffmann; Marc F Hoylaerts; Nino Künzli; Nicholas Mills; Juha Pekkanen; Annette Peters; Massimo F Piepoli; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Robert F Storey
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Spatial modeling of PM2.5 concentrations with a multifactoral radial basis function neural network.

Authors:  Bin Zou; Min Wang; Neng Wan; J Gaines Wilson; Xin Fang; Yuqi Tang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  An ensemble-based model of PM2.5 concentration across the contiguous United States with high spatiotemporal resolution.

Authors:  Qian Di; Heresh Amini; Liuhua Shi; Itai Kloog; Rachel Silvern; James Kelly; M Benjamin Sabath; Christine Choirat; Petros Koutrakis; Alexei Lyapustin; Yujie Wang; Loretta J Mickley; Joel Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  Associations of air pollution with obesity and body fat percentage, and modification by polygenic risk score for BMI in the UK Biobank.

Authors:  Melissa A Furlong; Yann C Klimentidis
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Analysis of black carbon on filters by image-based reflectance.

Authors:  Matthew Jeronimo; Quinn Stewart; Andrew T Weakley; Jason Giacomo; Xiaolu Zhang; Nicole Hyslop; Ann M Dillner; Matthew Shupler; Michael Brauer
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Estrogen receptor beta polymorphisms and cognitive performance in women: associations and modifications by genetic and environmental influences.

Authors:  Karin Fehsel; Tamara Schikowski; Michaela Jänner; Anke Hüls; Mohammed Voussoughi; Thomas Schulte; Andrea Vierkötter; Tom Teichert; Christian Herder; Dorothea Sugiri; Ursula Krämer; Christian Luckhaus
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Constrained Source Apportionment of Coarse Particulate Matter and Selected Trace Elements in Three Cities from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Timothy M Sturtz; Sara D Adar; Timothy Gould; Timothy V Larson
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.798

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.