Literature DB >> 34493080

Population-level consequences of inheritable somatic mutations and the evolution of mutation rates in plants.

Thomas Lesaffre1.   

Abstract

Inbreeding depression, that is the decrease in fitness of inbred relative to outbred individuals, was shown to increase strongly as life expectancy increases in plants. Because plants are thought to not have a separated germline, it was proposed that this pattern could be generated by somatic mutations accumulating during growth, since larger and more long-lived species have more opportunities for mutations to accumulate. A key determinant of the role of somatic mutations is the rate at which they occur, which probably differs between species because mutation rates may evolve differently in species with constrasting life histories. In this paper, I study the evolution of the mutation rates in plants, and consider the population-level consequences of inheritable somatic mutations given this evolution. I show that despite substantially lower somatic and meiotic mutation rates, more long-lived species still tend to accumulate larger amounts of deleterious mutations because of the increased number of opportunities they have to acquire mutations during growth, leading to higher levels of inbreeding depression in these species. However, the magnitude of this increase depends strongly on how mutagenic meiosis is relative to growth, to the point of being close to non-existent in some situations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  growth; inbreeding depression; life history; mutation rate; somatic mutations

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34493080      PMCID: PMC8424331          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.530


  28 in total

Review 1.  The genetics of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; John H Willis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Elevated Mutagenicity in Meiosis and Its Mechanism.

Authors:  Ayelet Arbel-Eden; Giora Simchen
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Patterns of Stem Cell Divisions Contribute to Plant Longevity.

Authors:  Agata Burian; Pierre Barbier de Reuille; Cris Kuhlemeier
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Inbreeding and variance effective numbers in populations with overlapping generations.

Authors:  J Felsenstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Mutation Rate Evolution in Partially Selfing and Partially Asexual Organisms.

Authors:  Camille Gervais; Denis Roze
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Low number of fixed somatic mutations in a long-lived oak tree.

Authors:  Emanuel Schmid-Siegert; Namrata Sarkar; Christian Iseli; Sandra Calderon; Caroline Gouhier-Darimont; Jacqueline Chrast; Pietro Cattaneo; Frédéric Schütz; Laurent Farinelli; Marco Pagni; Michel Schneider; Jérémie Voumard; Michel Jaboyedoff; Christian Fankhauser; Christian S Hardtke; Laurent Keller; John R Pannell; Alexandre Reymond; Marc Robinson-Rechavi; Ioannis Xenarios; Philippe Reymond
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 15.793

7.  Evolutionary consequences of mutation and selection within an individual.

Authors:  S P Otto; M E Orive
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Somatic deleterious mutation rate in a woody plant: estimation from phenotypic data.

Authors:  K Bobiwash; S T Schultz; D J Schoen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  The architecture of intra-organism mutation rate variation in plants.

Authors:  Long Wang; Yilun Ji; Yingwen Hu; Huaying Hu; Xianqin Jia; Mengmeng Jiang; Xiaohui Zhang; Lina Zhao; Yanchun Zhang; Yanxiao Jia; Chao Qin; Luyao Yu; Ju Huang; Sihai Yang; Laurence D Hurst; Dacheng Tian
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Do plants have a segregated germline?

Authors:  Robert Lanfear
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.