| Literature DB >> 34488651 |
Akito Yoshiko1, Takashi Kaji2, Tsuyoshi Kozuka2, Takayuki Sawazaki2, Hiroshi Akima3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Higher muscle echo intensity (EI) reflects higher content of fat and/or connective tissue within skeletal muscle, eventually inducing lower muscle strength, physical dysfunction, and metabolic impairment. Continuous exercise decreases muscle EI in older individuals; however, it is not well understood how several months' rehabilitation exercise affects gradation-based EI. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of 6 months of rehabilitation exercise on gradation-based higher and lower EI in older men and women.Entities:
Keywords: Elderly individuals; Gradation-based echo intensity; Muscle thickness; Rehabilitation exercise
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34488651 PMCID: PMC8422694 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02423-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 3.921
Fig. 1Representative ultrasound images in anterior, lateral, and posterior regions. A and D are the anterior, B and E are the lateral, and C and F are the posterior regions. Surface muscles (rectus femoris from A, vastus lateralis from B and biceps femoris from C) are traced using dotted lines in D, E, and F. Muscle echo intensities, and cross-sectional areas (CSAs) are measured from the dotted-line tracked region. Arrows show the thickness of the subcutaneous fat and muscle. G, H, and I is histograms of the ROI’s pixel intensity from rectus femoris (G), vastus lateralis (H) and biceps femoris (I). SF-A, subcutaneous fat thickness of the anterior region; RF, rectus femoris; VI-A, vastus intermedius of the anterior region; SF-L, subcutaneous fat thickness of the lateral region; VL, vastus lateralis; VI-L, vastus intermedius of the lateral region; SF-P, subcutaneous fat thickness of the posterior region; BF, biceps femoris. White bars are 1 cm in scale
Subcutaneous fat thickness and muscle thickness taken by ultrasonography at before and after the 6 months rehabilitation exercise
| Before ( | After (n = 27) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior (cm) | 1.19 | ± | 0.23 | 1.37 | ± | 0.24 |
| Lateral (cm) | 0.62 | ± | 0.29 | 0.59 | ± | 0.28 |
| Posterior (cm) | 0.71 | ± | 0.29 | 0.73 | ± | 0.28 |
| Thigh muscles (cm) | 0.71 | ± | 0.25 | 0.71 | ± | 0.25 |
| Rectus femoris (cm) | 1.14 | ± | 0.27 | 1.23 | ± | 0.28* |
| Vastus lateralis (cm) | 1.31 | ± | 0.35 | 1.37 | ± | 0.34 |
| Vastus intermedius anterior (cm) | 0.99 | ± | 0.29 | 1.09 | ± | 0.35* |
| Vastus intermedius lateral (cm) | 0.86 | ± | 0.34 | 0.94 | ± | 0.30* |
| Biceps femoris (cm) | 1.67 | ± | 0.34 | 2.00 | ± | 0.38* |
| Thigh muscles (cm) | 1.19 | ± | 0.23 | 1.37 | ± | 0.24* |
Values are shown as mean ± SD
*P < 0.05 vs. Before
Average echo intensity and cross-sectional area of the region of interest (ROI) at before and after the 6 months rehabilitation exercise
| Before (n = 27) | After (n = 27) | %change | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rectus femoris (a.u.) | 4.47 | ± | 1.09 | 4.39 | ± | 0.89* | 0.27 | ± | 13.79 |
| Vastus lateralis (a.u.) | 66.99 | ± | 14.97 | 56.08 | ± | 17.28* | −16.85 | ± | 15.70 |
| Biceps femoris (a.u.) | 59.12 | ± | 13.24 | 42.04 | ± | 13.43* | −28.43 | ± | 21.01 |
| Thigh muscles (a.u.) | 67.20 | ± | 10.59 | 52.71 | ± | 13.10* | −22.04 | ± | 12.57 |
| Rectus femoris (cm2) | 3.67 | ± | 1.01 | 3.51 | ± | 0.84 | −1.19 | ± | 20.37 |
| Vastus lateralis (cm2) | 4.89 | ± | 1.73 | 4.68 | ± | 1.39 | −1.56 | ± | 17.87 |
| Biceps femoris (cm2) | 4.86 | ± | 1.41 | 4.99 | ± | 1.32 | 8.99 | ± | 35.12 |
| Thigh muscles (cm2) | 4.47 | ± | 1.09 | 4.39 | ± | 0.89 | 0.27 | ± | 13.79 |
Values are shown as mean ± SD
*P < 0.05 vs. Before
Fig. 2Gradation-based echo intensity (EI) cross-sectional areas before and after the 6 months rehabilitation exercise. * P < 0.05 vs. before