Literature DB >> 34488197

Virtual bronchoscopy-guided lung SAbR: dosimetric implications of using AAA versus Acuros XB to calculate dose in airways.

P Kinkopf1, A Modiri1, Kun-Chang Yu2, Y Yan3, P Mohindra1, R Timmerman3, A Sawant1, E Vicente1.   

Abstract

In previous works, we showed that incorporating individual airways as organs-at-risk (OARs) in the treatment of lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) patients potentially mitigates post-SAbR radiation injury. However, the performance of common clinical dose calculation algorithms in airways has not been thoroughly studied. Airways are of particular concern because their small size and the density differences they create have the potential to hinder dose calculation accuracy. To address this gap in knowledge, here we investigate dosimetric accuracy in airways of two commonly used dose calculation algorithms, the anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and Acuros-XB (AXB), recreating clinical treatment plans on a cohort of four SAbR patients. A virtual bronchoscopy software was used to delineate 856 airways on a high-resolution breath-hold CT (BHCT) image acquired for each patient. The planning target volumes (PTVs) and standard thoracic OARs were contoured on an average CT (AVG) image over the breathing cycle. Conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans were recreated on the BHCT image and on the AVG image, for a total of four plan types per patient. Dose calculations were performed using AAA and AXB, and the differences in maximum and mean dose in each structure were calculated. The median differences in maximum dose among all airways were ≤0.3Gy in magnitude for all four plan types. With airways grouped by dose-to-structure or diameter, median dose differences were still ≤0.5Gy in magnitude, with no clear dependence on airway size. These results, along with our previous airway radiosensitivity works, suggest that dose differences between AAA and AXB correspond to an airway collapse variation ≤0.7% in magnitude. This variation in airway injury risk can be considered as not clinically relevant, and the use of either AAA or AXB is therefore appropriate when including patient airways as individual OARs so as to reduce risk of radiation-induced lung toxicity.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AAA; acuros; airways; dose calculation; functional avoidance radiotherapy planning

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34488197      PMCID: PMC8796430          DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac240c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express        ISSN: 2057-1976


  26 in total

1.  Robust 3-D airway tree segmentation for image-guided peripheral bronchoscopy.

Authors:  Michael W Graham; Jason D Gibbs; Duane C Cornish; William E Higgins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.

Authors:  Ann Van Esch; Laura Tillikainen; Jukka Pyykkonen; Mikko Tenhunen; Hannu Helminen; Sami Siljamäki; Jyrki Alakuijala; Marta Paiusco; Mauro Lori; Dominique P Huyskens
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dosimetric validation of Acuros XB with Monte Carlo methods for photon dose calculations.

Authors:  K Bush; I M Gagne; S Zavgorodni; W Ansbacher; W Beckham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Dose--volume metrics associated with radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Yukinori Matsuo; Keiko Shibuya; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Masaru Narabayashi; Katsuyuki Sakanaka; Nami Ueki; Ken Miyagi; Yoshiki Norihisa; Takashi Mizowaki; Yasushi Nagata; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Excessive toxicity when treating central tumors in a phase II study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Robert Timmerman; Ronald McGarry; Constantin Yiannoutsos; Lech Papiez; Kathy Tudor; Jill DeLuca; Marvene Ewing; Ramzi Abdulrahman; Colleen DesRosiers; Mark Williams; James Fletcher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Algorithms used in heterogeneous dose calculations show systematic differences as measured with the Radiological Physics Center's anthropomorphic thorax phantom used for RTOG credentialing.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Paola Alvarez; Andrea Molineu; Carrie Amador; James Galvin; David S Followill
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Validation of the Acuros XB dose calculation algorithm versus Monte Carlo for clinical treatment plans.

Authors:  Lone Hoffmann; Markus Alber; Matthias Söhn; Ulrik Vindelev Elstrøm
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Systemic review of the patterns of failure following stereotactic body radiation therapy in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: clinical implications.

Authors:  Alexander Chi; Zhongxing Liao; Nam P Nguyen; Jiahong Xu; Baldassarre Stea; Ritsuko Komaki
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  On the use of AAA and AcurosXB algorithms for three different stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) techniques: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT).

Authors:  Abdulrahman Tajaldeen; Prabhakar Ramachandran; Salem Alghamdi; Moshi Geso
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-03-23

10.  Dosimetric accuracy and clinical quality of Acuros XB and AAA dose calculation algorithm for stereotactic and conventional lung volumetric modulated arc therapy plans.

Authors:  Petra S Kroon; Sandra Hol; Marion Essers
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.