Literature DB >> 34487546

Mask-induced Koebner phenomenon in an inverse psoriatic patient during COVID-19 pandemic.

Xiao Sun1,2, Ling Chen3, Zhu Shen1,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Koebner phenomenon; case report; inverse psoriasis; mask; skin barrier

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34487546      PMCID: PMC8653386          DOI: 10.1111/cod.13967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.419


× No keyword cloud information.
Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, people have worn masks to protect their respiratory system. However, wearing masks for a long time may cause health consequences to the skin. Here we describe a case of mask‐induced Koebner phenomenon in an inverse psoriatic patient during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

CASE REPORT

A 19‐year‐old man developed well‐defined erythematous patches covered with scales in both of his ear grooves for 4 months, which worsened 4 weeks ago. The skin lesions appeared in mask‐lace covered areas (Figure 1A,B, Figure S1). Meanwhile, the patient also had lesions on his scalp, belly button, perineum, and axillae (Figures S1 and S2).
FIGURE 1

Mask‐induced Koebner phenomenon and recommendations for wearing masks. (A,B) Clinical manifestations of the patient in his ear grooves. (C,D) His improvement after treatments. (E) Recommendations for wearing masks for such patient. Upper left, a common thin‐lace and ear‐loop style mask; bottom two on the left, a mask with wider laces and corresponding lower pressure; upper right, an ear loop‐style mask modified with a plastic handle; bottom right, a head‐strap mask

Mask‐induced Koebner phenomenon and recommendations for wearing masks. (A,B) Clinical manifestations of the patient in his ear grooves. (C,D) His improvement after treatments. (E) Recommendations for wearing masks for such patient. Upper left, a common thin‐lace and ear‐loop style mask; bottom two on the left, a mask with wider laces and corresponding lower pressure; upper right, an ear loop‐style mask modified with a plastic handle; bottom right, a head‐strap mask He had a 1‐year history of inverse psoriasis. Before the first onset of psoriasis in the ear grooves, he had worn a mask almost every day, especially when riding on the subway. His lesions in the ear grooves were aggravated after his participation in military training at the university 4 weeks ago. He sweated a lot during military training and did not wear a mask. The patient has no family history of psoriasis and has no other special physical abnormalities. The diagnosis of inverse psoriasis in the ear grooves by mask laces was made. He was prescribed topical tacrolimus ointment in the ear grooves and body folds, and calcipotriol betamethasone gel on the scalp. Meanwhile, he was advised to avoid using ear‐hook masks. Two weeks later, the skin lesions in the ear grooves turned into pale red patches, and scales disappeared (Figure 1C,D). Most of the skin lesions in the body folds improved significantly (Figures S2 and S3).

DISCUSSION

The Koebner phenomenon was first described in 1876 by Heinrich Koebner. This phenomenon is described as the following: after nonspecific damage (such as trauma, sun exposure, some skin diseases, and so on), previously unaffected skin can develop skin lesions identical to existing skin diseases. Mask‐induced Koebner phenomenon during the COVID‐19 pandemic needs our attention. In this case, the appearance of psoriasis skin lesions caused by mask laces on both side of the cefalo‐auricular folds is a Koebner phenomenon. The ear grooves in close contact with the mask laces are exposed to an inflammatory micro‐environment, which may be similar to the sweaty and humid environment of the folds of the body. The disruption of a functional and structural permeability barrier is an important factor in the Koebner reaction of psoriasis. Therefore, changes in the local micro‐environment coupled with external stimulus from the mask laces caused the patient's Koebner reaction. Wearing a mask is inevitable throughout the COVID‐19 pandemic. People with inverse psoriasis, in addition to getting medical treatment, should be advised to use masks that are less irritating to ear grooves in order to avoid Koebner phenomena. For example, (i) masks with wider laces and corresponding lower pressure on the skin of the ear grooves (Figure 1E, bottom two on the left). Moreover, unlike thin‐lace masks (Figure 1E, upper left), the connection point between the laces and the mask body is on the outside of the mask for the wide one. In this way, the body of the mask can act as a buffer, so the external force of the laces on the ear grooves will be relatively lower; (ii) masks with the laces made of special materials (eg, softer or less irritating) that can reduce the friction or stimuli of the mask laces on the skin; (iii) masks with a head strap that can avoid the irritation of the mask laces to the ears (Figure 1E, bottom right); (iv) ear loop‐style masks modified with a plastic handle can also reduce local pressure and friction on the ear groove (Figure 1E, upper right) ; and (v) mask‐free breaks as frequent as possible can also be helpful. During this long‐term COVID‐19 pandemic, we should pay more attention to the skin damage caused or aggravated by common protective facilities, especially masks. The above are the recommendations we provide to patients with inverse psoriasis or patients in atopic/sensitive states who are worried about the ear skin external stimulations. These recommendations clearly need further improvements.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. Appendix S1. Supporting information Click here for additional data file.
  8 in total

1.  Stratum corneum structure and function correlates with phenotype in psoriasis.

Authors:  R Ghadially; J T Reed; P M Elias
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 8.551

2.  British Society for Cutaneous Allergy advice on skin damage from FFP3 masks.

Authors:  Deirdre Buckley; Natalie Stone
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-06-09

3.  Mask-induced Koebner phenomenon in an inverse psoriatic patient during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Xiao Sun; Ling Chen; Zhu Shen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.419

4.  COVID-19 pandemic and the skin: what should dermatologists know?

Authors:  Razvigor Darlenski; Nikolai Tsankov
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.541

5.  Mask-induced Koebner phenomenon and its clinical phenotypes: A multicenter, real-life study focusing on 873 dermatological consultations during COVID-19 pandemics.

Authors:  Giovanni Damiani; Laura Cristina Gironi; Khalaf Kridin; Alessia Pacifico; Alessandra Buja; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Magdalena Spalkowska; Paolo Daniele Maria Pigatto; Pierachille Santus; Paola Savoia
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.858

6.  Rational use of face masks in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Shuo Feng; Chen Shen; Nan Xia; Wei Song; Mengzhen Fan; Benjamin J Cowling
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 30.700

7.  Short-term skin reactions following use of N95 respirators and medical masks.

Authors:  Wei Hua; Ying Zuo; Ruoyu Wan; Lidan Xiong; Jie Tang; Lin Zou; Xiaohong Shu; Li Li
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 6.419

8.  Wearing the N95 mask with a plastic handle reduces pressure injury.

Authors:  Wanting Jiang; Wenwen Cao; Qian Liu
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 11.527

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Mask-induced Koebner phenomenon in an inverse psoriatic patient during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Xiao Sun; Ling Chen; Zhu Shen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.419

2.  Enhanced Fluctuations in Facial Pore Size, Redness, and TEWL Caused by Mask Usage Are Normalized by the Application of a Moisturizer.

Authors:  Kukizo Miyamoto; Yoko Munakata; Xianghong Yan; Gaku Tsuji; Masutaka Furue
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.