Literature DB >> 34487211

Variations of Phyllosphere and Rhizosphere Microbial Communities of Pinus koraiensis Infected by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus.

Jiaojiao Deng1, Dapao Yu1, Wangming Zhou1, Li Zhou2, Wenxu Zhu3.   

Abstract

Pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, as one of the greatest threats to pine trees, is spreading all over the world. Plant microorganisms play an important role in the pathogenesis of nematodes. The phyllosphere and rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities associated with healthy Pinus koraiensis (PKa) and P. koraiensis infected by B. xylophilus at the early (PKb) and last (PKc) stages were analyzed. Our results demonstrated that pine wood nematode (PWD) could increase the phyllosphere bacterial Pielou_e, Shannon, and Simpson index; phyllosphere fungal Chao 1 index, as well as rhizosphere bacterial Pielou_e, Shannon, and Simpson index; and rhizosphere fungal Pielou_e, Shannon, and Simpson index. What's more, slight shifts of the microbial diversity were observed at the early stage of infection, and the microbial diversity increased significantly as the symptoms of infection worsened. With the infection of B. xylophilus in P. koraiensis, Bradyrhizobium (rhizosphere bacteria), Massilia (phyllosphere bacteria), and Phaeosphaeriaceae (phyllosphere fungi) were the major contributors to the differences in community compositions among different treatments. With the infection of PWD, most of the bacterial groups tended to be co-excluding rather than co-occurring. These changes would correlate with microbial ability to suppress plant pathogen, enhancing the understanding of disease development and providing guidelines to pave the way for its possible management.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Network interactions; Phyllosphere microorganism; Pine wood nematode; Pinus koraiensis; Rhizosphere microorganism

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34487211     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-021-01850-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  36 in total

1.  Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria.

Authors:  Noah Fierer; Mark A Bradford; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Application of natural blends of phytochemicals derived from the root exudates of Arabidopsis to the soil reveal that phenolic-related compounds predominantly modulate the soil microbiome.

Authors:  Dayakar V Badri; Jacqueline M Chaparro; Ruifu Zhang; Qirong Shen; Jorge M Vivanco
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Rhizosphere microbes as essential partners for plant stress tolerance.

Authors:  Axel de Zelicourt; Mohamed Al-Yousif; Heribert Hirt
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 13.164

4.  Biodiversity acts as insurance of productivity of bacterial communities under abiotic perturbations.

Authors:  Ashutosh Awasthi; Mangal Singh; Sumit K Soni; Rakshapal Singh; Alok Kalra
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Native soils with their microbiotas elicit a state of alert in tomato plants.

Authors:  Matteo Chialva; Alessandra Salvioli di Fossalunga; Stefania Daghino; Stefano Ghignone; Paolo Bagnaresi; Marco Chiapello; Mara Novero; Davide Spadaro; Silvia Perotto; Paola Bonfante
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Emergent simplicity in microbial community assembly.

Authors:  Joshua E Goldford; Nanxi Lu; Djordje Bajić; Sylvie Estrela; Mikhail Tikhonov; Alicia Sanchez-Gorostiaga; Daniel Segrè; Pankaj Mehta; Alvaro Sanchez
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Molecular ecological network analyses.

Authors:  Ye Deng; Yi-Huei Jiang; Yunfeng Yang; Zhili He; Feng Luo; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Microbial community overlap between the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of three plants from Yongxing Island, South China Sea.

Authors:  Lijun Bao; Wenyang Cai; Jianxi Cao; Xiaofen Zhang; Jinhong Liu; Hao Chen; Yuansong Wei; Xuliang Zhuang; Guoqiang Zhuang; Zhihui Bai
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 9.  Scientists' warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change.

Authors:  Ricardo Cavicchioli; William J Ripple; Kenneth N Timmis; Farooq Azam; Lars R Bakken; Matthew Baylis; Michael J Behrenfeld; Antje Boetius; Philip W Boyd; Aimée T Classen; Thomas W Crowther; Roberto Danovaro; Christine M Foreman; Jef Huisman; David A Hutchins; Janet K Jansson; David M Karl; Britt Koskella; David B Mark Welch; Jennifer B H Martiny; Mary Ann Moran; Victoria J Orphan; David S Reay; Justin V Remais; Virginia I Rich; Brajesh K Singh; Lisa Y Stein; Frank J Stewart; Matthew B Sullivan; Madeleine J H van Oppen; Scott C Weaver; Eric A Webb; Nicole S Webster
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 60.633

10.  Bacterial communities in the rhizosphere, phyllosphere and endosphere of tomato plants.

Authors:  Chun-Juan Dong; Ling-Ling Wang; Qian Li; Qing-Mao Shang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Community composition and trophic mode diversity of fungi associated with fruiting body of medicinal Sanghuangporus vaninii.

Authors:  Yanjun Ma; Weiqian Gao; Fan Zhang; Xuetai Zhu; Weibao Kong; Shiquan Niu; Kun Gao; Hongqin Yang
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.465

2.  Effects on community composition and function Pinus massoniana infected by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus.

Authors:  Xin Hao; Xuefeng Liu; Jie Chen; Bowen Wang; Yang Li; Yi Ye; Wei Ma; Ling Ma
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.465

3.  Study on the differences of phyllosphere microorganisms between poplar hybrid offspring and their parents.

Authors:  Changjun Ding; Weixi Zhang; Yanbo Wang; Mi Ding; Xiaojiang Wang; Aiping Li; Dejun Liang; Xiaohua Su
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.