Literature DB >> 34487147

Short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer (the KLASS-04 trial).

D J Park1,2, Y-W Kim3, H-K Yang1, K W Ryu3, S-U Han4, H-H Kim2, W-J Hyung5, J H Park6, Y-S Suh1,2, O K Kwon7, H M Yoon3, W Kim8, Y-K Park9, S-H Kong1, S H Ahn2, H-J Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There remain concerns about the safety and functional benefit of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LPPG) compared with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG). This study evaluated short-term outcomes of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing LPPG with LDG for gastric cancer.
METHODS: The Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS)-04 trial was an investigator-initiated, open-label, parallel-assigned, superiority, multicentre RCT in Korea. Patients with cT1N0M0 cancer located in the middle third of the stomach at least 5 cm from the pylorus were randomized to undergo LPPG or LDG. Participants, care givers and those assessing the outcomes were not blinded to group assignment. Outcomes were 30-day postoperative morbidity rate and death at 90 days.
RESULTS: Some 256 patients from nine institutions were randomized (LPPG 129 patients, LDG 127 patients) between July 2015 and July 2017 and outcomes for 253 patients were analysed. Postoperative complications within 30 days were seen in 19.3 and 15.5 per cent in the LPPG and LDG groups respectively (P = 0·419). Postoperative pyloric stenosis was observed in nine (7.2 per cent) and two (1·5 per cent) patients in the LPPG and LDG groups (P = 0·026) respectively. In multivariable analysis higher BMI was a risk factor for postoperative complications (odds ratio 1·17, 95 per cent c.i. 1·04 to 1·32; P = 0·011). Death at 90 days was zero in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Postoperative complications and mortality was comparable in patients undergoing LPPG and LDG. Registration number: NCT02595086 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34487147     DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  5 in total

1.  Intracorporeal hand-sewn anastomosis following pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: surgical technique and short-term surgical outcome.

Authors:  Masaki Aizawa; Hiroshi Yabusaki; Atsushi Matsuki; Takeo Bamba; Satoru Nakagawa
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Postoperative quality of life after gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients: a prospective longitudinal observation study.

Authors:  Chao-Jie Wang; Yun-Suhk Suh; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Ji-Hyeon Park; Shin-Hoo Park; Jong-Ho Choi; Fadhel Alzahrani; Khalid Alzahrani; Seong-Ho Kong; Do-Joong Park; Hui Cao; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 1.766

3.  Signature and Prediction of Perigastric Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Gastric Cancer and Total Gastrectomy: Is Total Gastrectomy Always Necessary?

Authors:  Chun-Dong Zhang; Hiroharu Yamashita; Yasuhiro Okumura; Koichi Yagi; Susumu Aikou; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Pathological and oncological outcomes of pylorus-preserving versus conventional distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sen Hou; Fan Liu; Zhidong Gao; Yingjiang Ye
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.253

Review 5.  Function-Preserving Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Hiramatsu; Hirotoshi Kikuchi; Hiroya Takeuchi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.