| Literature DB >> 34486655 |
Clair A Kronk1, Avery R Everhart2,3, Florence Ashley3,4, Hale M Thompson5, Theodore E Schall6, Teddy G Goetz7, Laurel Hiatt8, Zackary Derrick9, Roz Queen10, A Ram11, E Mae Guthman3,12, Olivia M Danforth13, Elle Lett3,14, Emery Potter15, Simón E D Sun3,16,17, Zack Marshall18, Ryan Karnoski3,19.
Abstract
There are over 1 million transgender people living in the United States, and 33% report negative experiences with a healthcare provider, many of which are connected to data representation in electronic health records (EHRs). We present recommendations and common pitfalls involving sex- and gender-related data collection in EHRs. Our recommendations leverage the needs of patients, medical providers, and researchers to optimize both individual patient experiences and the efficacy and reproducibility of EHR population-based studies. We also briefly discuss adequate additions to the EHR considering name and pronoun usage. We add the disclaimer that these questions are more complex than commonly assumed. We conclude that collaborations between local transgender and gender-diverse persons and medical providers as well as open inclusion of transgender and gender-diverse individuals on terminology and standards boards is crucial to shifting the paradigm in transgender and gender-diverse health.Entities:
Keywords: bioethics; electronic health records; gender and sexual minorities; transgender persons
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34486655 PMCID: PMC8757312 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc ISSN: 1067-5027 Impact factor: 7.942