Literature DB >> 34484897

Variability of the Modified Rankin Scale Score Between Day 90 and 1 Year After Ischemic Stroke.

Adam de Havenon1, David L Tirschwell1, Laura Heitsch1, Steven C Cramer1, Robynne Braun1, John Cole1, Vivek Reddy1, Jennifer J Majersik1, Arne Lindgren1, Bradford B Worrall1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Studies indicate that the functional outcome evolves in the year after ischemic stroke onset. However, the traditional outcome measure in stroke trials is the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days from onset. To determine mRS fluctuations in the first year after stroke, we examined data from 3 major stroke trials.
METHODS: In a secondary analysis, we evaluated intrapatient mRS between 90 days and 1 year from stroke onset, the mRS shift (∆mRS = 1 year-day 90), and the trials' primary outcome at day 90 and 1 year.
RESULTS: We included 624 patients from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study, 587 from Albumin Treatment for Acute Ischaemic Stroke, and 611 from Interventional Management of Stroke III, for which the proportion of patients with a ∆mRS change between day 90 and 1 year was 36.5%, 41.7%, and 36.0%. However, the trials' primary outcomes did not differ at 1 year vs 90 days. Similar findings were seen in a second cohort where we pooled the trials and excluded patients with recurrent stroke or death during the follow-up. In those 1,314 patients, 544 (41.4%) had a ∆mRS change, of which 379 (28.9%) had improvement and 165 (12.5%) had worsening, apart from death.
CONCLUSION: We describe the patient-level spectrum of mRS change from day 90 to 1 year after ischemic stroke in 3 high-quality randomized trials. The patient-level shifts consisted of a sufficiently counterbalanced number of mRS improvements and declines, which masked clinical evolution occurring in over one-third of patients. These results may have important implications, both for clinical trial design and outcome adjudication in stroke research and duration of rehabilitative therapy.
© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34484897      PMCID: PMC8382369          DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract        ISSN: 2163-0402


  13 in total

1.  Long term outcome after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Simon Fleminger; Jennie Ponsford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-17

2.  The case for modality-specific outcome measures in clinical trials of stroke recovery-promoting agents.

Authors:  Steven C Cramer; Walter J Koroshetz; Seth P Finklestein
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  The Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale as prognostic tools for long-term outcomes after stroke: a qualitative review of the literature.

Authors:  Krista F Huybrechts; J Jaime Caro
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.580

4.  Two-Year Outcome after Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Lucie A van den Berg; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Olvert A Berkhemer; Puck S S Fransen; Debbie Beumer; Hester F Lingsma; Charles B L M Majoie; Diederik W J Dippel; Aad van der Lugt; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Wim H van Zwam; Yvo B W E M Roos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Stroke Recovery Genetics.

Authors:  Arne Lindgren; Jane Maguire
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Disability status at 1 month is a reliable proxy for final ischemic stroke outcome.

Authors:  Bruce Ovbiagele; Patrick D Lyden; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  A standardized approach to the Fugl-Meyer assessment and its implications for clinical trials.

Authors:  Jill See; Lucy Dodakian; Cathy Chou; Vicky Chan; Alison McKenzie; David J Reinkensmeyer; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 8.  Time course of recovery following poor-grade SAH: the incidence of delayed improvement and implications for SAH outcome study design.

Authors:  David A Wilson; Peter Nakaji; Felipe C Albuquerque; Cameron G McDougall; Joseph M Zabramski; Robert F Spetzler
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 9.  Recovery and Rehabilitation after Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Michael F Saulle; Heidi M Schambra
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.420

10.  Long-term functional recovery after first ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Study.

Authors:  Mandip S Dhamoon; Yeseon Park Moon; Myunghee C Paik; Bernadette Boden-Albala; Tatjana Rundek; Ralph L Sacco; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  2 in total

1.  Intense Arm Rehabilitation Therapy Improves the Modified Rankin Scale Score: Association Between Gains in Impairment and Function.

Authors:  Steven C Cramer; Vu Le; Jeffrey L Saver; Lucy Dodakian; Jill See; Renee Augsburger; Alison McKenzie; Robert J Zhou; Nina L Chiu; Jutta Heckhausen; Jessica M Cassidy; Walt Scacchi; Megan Therese Smith; A M Barrett; Jayme Knutson; Dylan Edwards; David Putrino; Kunal Agrawal; Kenneth Ngo; Elliot J Roth; David L Tirschwell; Michelle L Woodbury; Ross Zafonte; Wenle Zhao; Judith Spilker; Steven L Wolf; Joseph P Broderick; Scott Janis
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  A differential of the left eye and right eye neurological pupil index is associated with discharge modified Rankin scores in neurologically injured patients.

Authors:  Claudio M Privitera; Sanjay V Neerukonda; Venkatesh Aiyagari; Shoji Yokobori; Ava M Puccio; Nathan J Schneider; Sonja E Stutzman; DaiWai M Olson
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.903

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.