Literature DB >> 20733143

Disability status at 1 month is a reliable proxy for final ischemic stroke outcome.

Bruce Ovbiagele1, Patrick D Lyden, Jeffrey L Saver.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Three months is the standard timepoint for assessing final functional status after acute ischemic stroke in phase 3 clinical trials. Earlier reliable timepoints for outcome ascertainment would facilitate care quality improvement programs that employ administrative datasets and reduce the loss to follow-up observed in many stroke clinical trials. We assessed whether day 30 global disability status reliably predicts final 3-month disability outcome among acute stroke patients.
METHODS: Data of 5,997 subjects in acute stroke trials conducted between 1998 and 2006 from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive dataset were partitioned into a derivation cohort (n = 4,051) and a validation cohort (n = 1,946). Global disability was assessed with modified Rankin Scale (mRS). To evaluate the association of day 30 vs day 90 mRS, weighted kappa agreement was computed and then adjusted using multivariable ordinal logistic modeling.
RESULTS: Overall, mean age was 67.6 +/- 12.4 years; 2,541 (45.2%) were women. Day 30 mRS score correlated strongly with day 90 (r = 0.87, p < 0.001); weighted kappa agreement was 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.85-0.87, p < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, day 30 mRS was the dominant variable associated with day 90 mRS, accounting for 65.6% of the variance. Nine other baseline variables were associated with outcome, but collectively explained only an additional 1.8% of the variance.
CONCLUSIONS: After an index ischemic stroke, global disability status at 1 month reliably estimates final 3-month disability outcomes. One-month disability status alone may be dependable and efficient as an outcome measure in stroke quality improvement programs and select clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20733143      PMCID: PMC2931650          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181eee426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  17 in total

1.  Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis.

Authors:  J RANKIN
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  1957-05       Impact factor: 0.729

Review 2.  Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis.

Authors:  Jamie L Banks; Charles A Marotta
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales.

Authors:  Scott E Kasner
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 44.182

4.  Quality of life of stroke survivors.

Authors:  P Kim; S Warren; H Madill; M Hadley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Sex-based differences in response to recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke: a pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  David M Kent; Lori Lyn Price; Peter Ringleb; Michael D Hill; Harry P Selker
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Predicting major neurological improvement with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator treatment of stroke.

Authors:  Devin L Brown; Karen C Johnston; Douglas P Wagner; E Clarke Haley
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 7.  Novel end point analytic techniques and interpreting shifts across the entire range of outcome scales in acute stroke trials.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Burden of first-ever ischemic stroke in the oldest old: evidence from a population-based study.

Authors:  C Marini; M Baldassarre; T Russo; F De Santis; S Sacco; I Ciancarelli; A Carolei
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Stroke incidence, prevalence, and survival: secular trends in Rochester, Minnesota, through 1989.

Authors:  R D Brown; J P Whisnant; J D Sicks; W M O'Fallon; D O Wiebers
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  The Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive.

Authors:  Myzoon Ali; Philip M W Bath; John Curram; Stephen M Davis; Hans-Christoph Diener; Geoffrey A Donnan; Marc Fisher; Barbara A Gregson; James Grotta; Werner Hacke; Michael G Hennerici; Marc Hommel; Markku Kaste; John R Marler; Ralph L Sacco; Philip Teal; Nils-Gunnar Wahlgren; Steven Warach; Christopher J Weir; Kennedy R Lees
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  14 in total

1.  Natural History of Infratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhages: Two Subgroups with Distinct Presentations and Outcomes.

Authors:  Viren D Patel; Roxanna M Garcia; Dionne E Swor; Eric M Liotta; Matthew B Maas; Andrew Naidech
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 2.  Addressing post-stroke care in rural areas with Peru as a case study. Placing emphasis on evidence-based pragmatism.

Authors:  J Jaime Miranda; Miguel G Moscoso; Lijing L Yan; Francisco Diez-Canseco; Germán Málaga; Hector H Garcia; Bruce Ovbiagele
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.181

3.  Web-Based Assessment of Outcomes After Subarachnoid and Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A New Patient Centered Option for Outcomes Assessment.

Authors:  Andrew M Naidech; Jennifer L Beaumont; Michael Berman; Eric Liotta; Matthew B Maas; Shyam Prabhakaran; Konrad Kording; Jane Holl; David Cella
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number as a Marker and Mediator of Stroke Prognosis: Observational and Mendelian Randomization Analyses.

Authors:  Michael Robert Chong; Sukrit Narula; Robert Morton; Conor Judge; Loubna Akhabir; Nathan Cawte; Nazia Pathan; Ricky Lali; Pedrum Mohammadi-Shemirani; Ashkan Shoamanesh; Martin O'Donnell; Salim Yusuf; Peter Langhorne; Guillaume Paré
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Variability of the Modified Rankin Scale Score Between Day 90 and 1 Year After Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Adam de Havenon; David L Tirschwell; Laura Heitsch; Steven C Cramer; Robynne Braun; John Cole; Vivek Reddy; Jennifer J Majersik; Arne Lindgren; Bradford B Worrall
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-06

6.  Generalisations of a Bayesian decision-theoretic randomisation procedure and the impact of delayed responses.

Authors:  S Faye Williamson; Peter Jacko; Thomas Jaki
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 2.035

7.  Intracerebral hemorrhage and delirium symptoms. Length of stay, function, and quality of life in a 114-patient cohort.

Authors:  Andrew M Naidech; Jennifer L Beaumont; Neil F Rosenberg; Matthew B Maas; Adam R Kosteva; Michael L Ault; David Cella; E Wesley Ely
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Evaluation of machine learning methods to stroke outcome prediction using a nationwide disease registry.

Authors:  Ching-Heng Lin; Kai-Cheng Hsu; Kory R Johnson; Yang C Fann; Chon-Haw Tsai; Yu Sun; Li-Ming Lien; Wei-Lun Chang; Po-Lin Chen; Cheng-Li Lin; Chung Y Hsu
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Stroke: Stroke outcomes after 90 days—out of sight, out of mind?

Authors:  Mary Joan MacLeod; Melanie Turner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  Predicting 90-day modified Rankin Scale score with discharge information in acute ischaemic stroke patients following treatment.

Authors:  Andrew K ElHabr; Jeffrey M Katz; Jason Wang; Mehrad Bastani; Gabriela Martinez; Michele Gribko; Danny R Hughes; Pina Sanelli
Journal:  BMJ Neurol Open       Date:  2021-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.