| Literature DB >> 34481957 |
Nathaly Limon-De La Rosa1, Eduardo Cervantes-Alvarez2, Nalu Navarro-Alvarez3.
Abstract
It has been recently reported that patients with cirrhosis have significantly higher mortality following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavrisu 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection compared with those without.1,2 Specifically, it was demonstrated that mortality was greater in those with advanced cirrhosis (Child-Pugh B and C), and that from cirrhotic patients experiencing SARS-CoV-2 infection, close to half suffer acute decompensation including acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).2 Unfortunately, the presence of hepatic decompensation at baseline has been shown to be an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).1 Patients with decompensated cirrhosis contracting COVID-19 have a poor outcome, with an overall reported mortality of over 30%.1.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34481957 PMCID: PMC8410674 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.08.053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 1542-3565 Impact factor: 13.576
Anthropometric, Biochemical, and Clinical Characteristics of Cirrhotic Patients
| CC Patients (n = 8) | DC Patients (n = 36) | ACLF Patients (n = 35) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 4 (50.0) | 15 (41.7) | 13 (37.1) | .80 |
| Age, y | 57.0 (53.25–60.5) | 51.5 (41.0–58.75) | 51.0 (39.0–57.0) | .06 |
| Liver cirrhosis etiology | ||||
| Autoimmune | 1 (12.5) | 11 (30.6) | 18 (51.4) | .07 |
| HCV | 5 (62.5) | 11 (30.6) | 3 (8.6) | <.01 |
| Alcoholic liver disease | 1 (12.5) | 1 (2.8) | 2 (5.7) | .31 |
| NASH | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.8) | 2 (5.7) | .99 |
| Cryptogenic | 1 (12.5) | 8 (22.2) | 6 (17.1) | .92 |
| Other | 0 (0.0) | 4 (11.1) | 4 (11.4) | .99 |
| Pretransplantation clinical and laboratory data | ||||
| MELD-Na | 11 ± 3 | 18 ± 4 | 26 ± 6 | <.0001 |
| Encephalopathy | 0 (0.0) | 18 (50.0) | 28 (80.0) | <.0001 |
| Clinical ascites | 0 (0.0) | 25 (69.4) | 34 (97.1) | <.0001 |
| Total bilirubin, mg/dL | 1.14 (0.95–1.93) | 3.26 (2.13–5.10) | 10.62 (5.49–22.03) | <.0001 |
| Serum creatinine, mg/dL | 0.64 (0.55–0.70) | 0.69 (0.60–0.79) | 0.96 (0.78–1.32) | <.0001 |
| AST, U/L | 59.0 (47.0–112.50) | 70.0 (49.50–141.0) | 64.0 (40.0–144.0) | .75 |
| ALT, U/L | 55.3 (31.0–90.50) | 47.5 (32.50–85.15) | 33.0 (22.0–74.0) | .15 |
| INR | 1.2 (1.0–1.3) | 1.5 (1.3–1.6) | 1.7 (1.3–2.2) | <.001 |
| Leukocyte count (× 109/L) | 2.4 (2.0–3.9) | 3.8 (3.1–5.9) | 4.5 (2.9–5.6) | .07 |
Values are n (%) or median (interquartile range).
ACLF, acute-on-chronic liver failure; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CC, compensated cirrhosis; DC, decompensated cirrhosis; HCV, hepatitis C virus; INR, international normalized ratio; MELD-Na, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease–Sodium; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
Other etiologies include secondary biliary cirrhosis, drug-induced liver injury, and congenital liver diseases.
Statistical significance between groups CC and DC.
Statistical significance differences between groups CC and ACLF.
Statistical significance between groups DC and ACLF.
Figure 1ACE2, TMPRSS2, IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 hepatic mRNA levels in patients with cirrhosis. (A) ACE2 (left) and TMPRSS2 (right) expression in control (noncirrhotic; n = 36) and cirrhotic (n = 79) patients; and (B) ACE2 (left) and TMPRSS2 (right) expression when categorized by disease stage (compensated cirrhosis [CC], n = 8; decompensated cirrhosis [DC], n = 36; or ACLF, n = 35). (C) Correlation between hepatic ACE2 and TMPRSS2 gene expression. (D) IL-6 (left), IL-8 (middle), and MCP-1 (right) expression in control (noncirrhotic, n = 36) and cirrhotic (n = 79) patients. (A–D) Data in are shown as median with interquartile range. ∗∗P < .01, ∗∗∗∗P < .0001. (A, D) Mann-Whitney U test, (B) Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn post hoc test. IQR, interquartile range.
Supplementary Figure 1Correlation between angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2), and inflammatory markers interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) in patients with cirrhosis. Correlations between (A) ACE2 and (B) TMPRSS2 with IL-6 (left), IL-8 (middle), and MCP-1 (right) (Spearman’s coefficient).
| Primer | Forward | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
| 5′- GTTGCATATGCTATGAGGCAGT-3′ | 5′- TCAAATTAGCCACTCGCACA-3′ | |
| 5′- GGGAACGTCGATTCTTGC-3′ | 5′- CCCGTACACTCCTGGTCTG-3′ | |
| 5′-GAAAGTGGCTATGCAGTTTGAA-3′ | 5′-GAGGTAAGCCTACACTTTCCAAGA-3′ | |
| 5′-GAGCACTCCATAAGGCACAAA-3′ | 5′-ATGGTTCCTTCCGGTGGT-3′ | |
| 5′-TCAAACTGAAGCTCGCACTCT-3′ | 5′-GTGACTGGGGCATTGATTG-3′ | |
| 5′-CGATTGGATGGTTTAGTGAGG-3′ | 5′-AGTTCGACCGTCTTCTCAGC-3′ |