| Literature DB >> 34477998 |
Stefan Zielen1, Ruth Pia Duecker2, Sandra Woelke1, Helena Donath1, Sharhzad Bakhtiar3, Aileen Buecker1, Hermann Kreyenberg3, Sabine Huenecke3, Peter Bader3, Nizar Mahlaoui4, Stephan Ehl5, Sabine M El-Helou5,6,7, Barbara Pietrucha8, Alessandro Plebani9, Michiel van der Flier10, Koen van Aerde11, Sara S Kilic12, Shereen M Reda13, Larysa Kostyuchenko14, Elizabeth McDermott15, Nermeen Galal16, Claudio Pignata17, Juan Luis Santos Pérez18, Hans-Juergen Laws19, Tim Niehues20, Necil Kutukculer21, Markus G Seidel22, Laura Marques23, Peter Ciznar24, John David M Edgar25, Pere Soler-Palacín26, Horst von Bernuth27,28,29, Renate Krueger27, Isabelle Meyts30, Ulrich Baumann31, Maria Kanariou32, Bodo Grimbacher5,6,33, Fabian Hauck34, Dagmar Graf35, Luis Ignacio Gonzalez Granado36, Seraina Prader37, Ismail Reisli38, Mary Slatter39, Carlos Rodríguez-Gallego40, Peter D Arkwright41, Claire Bethune42, Elena Deripapa43, Svetlana O Sharapova44, Kai Lehmberg45, E Graham Davies46, Catharina Schuetz47, Gerhard Kindle5,48, Ralf Schubert1.
Abstract
Patients with ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) suffer from progressive cerebellar ataxia, immunodeficiency, respiratory failure, and cancer susceptibility. From a clinical point of view, A-T patients with IgA deficiency show more symptoms and may have a poorer prognosis. In this study, we analyzed mortality and immunity data of 659 A-T patients with regard to IgA deficiency collected from the European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) registry and from 66 patients with classical A-T who attended at the Frankfurt Goethe-University between 2012 and 2018. We studied peripheral B- and T-cell subsets and T-cell repertoire of the Frankfurt cohort and survival rates of all A-T patients in the ESID registry. Patients with A-T have significant alterations in their lymphocyte phenotypes. All subsets (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, CD4/CD45RA, and CD8/CD45RA) were significantly diminished compared to standard values. Patients with IgA deficiency (n = 35) had significantly lower lymphocyte counts compared to A-T patients without IgA deficiency (n = 31) due to a further decrease of naïve CD4 T-cells, central memory CD4 cells, and regulatory T-cells. Although both patient groups showed affected TCR-ß repertoires compared to controls, no differences could be detected between patients with and without IgA deficiency. Overall survival of patients with IgA deficiency was significantly diminished. For the first time, our data show that patients with IgA deficiency have significantly lower lymphocyte counts and subsets, which are accompanied with reduced survival, compared to A-T patients without IgA deficiency. IgA, a simple surrogate marker, is indicating the poorest prognosis for classical A-T patients. Both non-interventional clinical trials were registered at clinicaltrials.gov 2012 (Susceptibility to infections in ataxia-telangiectasia; NCT02345135) and 2017 (Susceptibility to Infections, tumor risk and liver disease in patients with ataxia-telangiectasia; NCT03357978).Entities:
Keywords: Ataxia-telangiectasia; IgA deficiency; Immunodeficiency; Immunoglobulins; Lymphopenia; Mortality
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34477998 PMCID: PMC8604875 DOI: 10.1007/s10875-021-01090-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Immunol ISSN: 0271-9142 Impact factor: 8.317
Fig. 1IgA deficiency influences survival in A-T. a Flow chart of the analyzed patients from the ESID registry. b Survival of patients with deficient IgA and patients with no deficient IgA. IgA < 0.07 g/L was defined as IgA deficient, and IgA ≥ 0.07 g/L was defined as no deficient IgA values below the age-appropriate normal range were defined as partial. † number of deceased patients
A-T patients from the ESID-registry
| All patients | no deficient IgA (IgA ≥ 0.07 g/L) | IgA deficient (IgA < 0.07 g/L) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients (n) | 461 | 300 | 161 | – |
| Age (years) | 19 (4–59) | 21 (5–59) | 17 (4–49) | 0.0001 |
| Sex (M/F) | 238/223 | 158/142 | 80/81 | n.s |
| IgA (g/L) | 0.25 (0.0–20.8) | 0.70 (0.07–20.8) | 0.06 (0.0–0.069) | 0.0001 |
| IgG (g/L) | 9.04 (0.08 – 31.5) | 9.1 (0.08 – 31.05) | 9.03 (0.08–21.2) | n.s |
| IgG2 (g/L) | 0.69 (0.0–33.7) | 0.63 (0.0–30.0) | 0.85 (0.0–33.7) | n.s |
| IgG4 (g/L) | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| IgM (g/L) | 1.561 (0.08–55.5) | 1.57 (0.08–55.5) | 1.70 (0.10–26.7) | n.s |
| Lymphocytes (cells/µL) | 1560 (120–17,330) | 1600 (120–17,330) | 1495 (140–12,190) | n.s |
| α-feto-protein (ng/mL) | 145 (1.89–1190) | 158 (1.89–1190) | 123 (4.71–973) | n.s |
| CRP | n.d | n.d | n.d | |
| Granulomas | n.d | n.d | n.d |
* included patients with partial IgA-D (n = 149)
A-T patients from the Frankfurt cohort
| All patients | no deficient IgA (IgA ≥ 0.07 g/L) | IgA deficient (IgA < 0.07 g/L) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients (n) | 66 | 31 | 35 | – |
| Age (years) | 12 (1–39) | 15 (2–39) | 10 (1–38) | n.s |
| Sex (M/F) | 35/31 | 16/15 | 19/16 | – |
| IgA (g/L) | 0.06 (0.002–2.25) | 11.0 (0.3–2.25) | 0.05 (0.002–0.06) | 0.0001 |
| IgG (g/L) | 8.70 (0.66–21.5) | 8.34 (3.96–21.5) | 9.01 (0.66–20.6) | n.s |
| IgG2 (g/L) | 0.69 (0.11–6.98) | 0.64 (0.12–2.76) | 0.82 (0.11–6.98) | n.s |
| IgG4 (g/L) | 0.02 (0.00–0.42) | 0.03 (0.00–0.42) | 0.02 (0.00–0.23) | n.s |
| IgM (g/L) | 1.53 (0.17–5.45) | 1.67 (0.72–5.45) | 1.19 (0.17–2.73) | n.s |
| Lymphocytes (cells/µL) | 1335 (180–3660) | 1608 (595–3660) | 1142 (180–2700) | 0.01 |
| α-feto-protein (ng/mL) | 278 (28.7–1264) | 266 (28.7–1264) | 332 (49–1044) | n.s |
| CRP§ | 18 | 4 | 14 | 0.05 |
| Granulomas | 8 | 1 | 7 | 0.058 |
* included patients with partial IgA-D (n = 7), all of them aged above 12 years of age and an IgA level > 0.3 g/L. § number of episodes with a significant elevation of CRP > 2 mg/dL
Fig. 2Effect of IgA deficiency on survival of A-T patients with IgG2 deficiency. a Flow charts of the analyzed patient cohorts. b Survival of patients with deficient IgG2 and patients with no deficient IgG2. c Survival of patients with deficient IgG2 only and patients with deficient IgG2 and deficient IgA. IgA < 0.07 g/L, and IgG2 < 0.3 were defined as deficient. † number of deceased patients
Fig. 3Effect of IgA deficiency on survival of A-T patients with lymphopenia. a Flow charts of the analyzed patient cohorts. b Survival of patients with lymphopenia and patients with normal lymphocytes. c Survival of patients with lymphopenia only and patients with lymphopenia and deficient IgA. IgA < 0.07 g/L was defined as deficient. Lymphopenia was defined as ≤ 1,500 cells/µL. † number of deceased patients
Fig. 4Lymphocytes in A-T patients with deficient IgA (IgA-D) and no deficient IgA (noDef). Blood samples of A-T patients were analyzed for total numbers of a CD3+ T-cells, b CD19+ B-cells, c CD3-CD56+ NK-cells, d CD3+CD4+ helper T-cells, e CD3+CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells and f CD4+CD25brightCD127dim regulatory T-cells. IgA-D. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01
Fig. 5T-cell subpopulations in A-T patients with deficient IgA (IgA-D) and no deficient IgA (noDef). Blood samples of A-T patients were analyzed for total numbers of a CD4+CD45RA+CD62L+ naïve T-cells, b CD4+CD45RO+CD62L+ central memory (CM) T-cells c CD4+CD45RO+CD62L− effector memory (EM) T-cells, d CD4+CD45RA+CD62L− effector memory RA (EMRA) T-cells, e CD8+CD45RA+CD62L+ naïve T-cells, f CD8+CD45RO+CD62L+ central memory (CM) T-cells g CD8+CD45RO+CD62L− effector memory (EM) T-cells, h CD8+CD45RA+CD62L− effector memory RA (EMRA) T-cells. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01
Fig. 6T-cell rearrangement in A-T patients with deficient IgA (IgA-D), no deficient IgA (noDef) and controls. a CDR3 length distribution of the TCR-ß repertoire given as relative frequency (total = 1) for control, noDef, and IgA-D samples. b Calculated diversity index of controls and both patient groups. c Productive clonality score of controls and both patient groups. The clonality score is derived from the Shannon entropy, which is calculated from the frequencies of all productive sequences divided by the logarithm of the total number of unique productive sequences. This normalized entropy value is then inverted (1 — normalized entropy) to produce the clonality metric. Entropy was calculated by summing the frequency of each clone times the log (base 2) of the same frequency over all productive reads in a sample