| Literature DB >> 34474667 |
Mariell Hoffmann1, Sandra Stengel2, Johanna Forstner2, Annika Baldauf2, Gunter Laux2, Frank Aluttis2, Markus Qreini2, Peter Engeser2, Joachim Szecsenyi2, Frank Peters-Klimm2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead from asymptomatic through to critical disease in a dynamic and unpredictable course within a few days. The challenge in outpatient monitoring the highly contagious COVID-19 disease during the ongoing pandemic is to filter severe courses followed by admission to hospital with the aim of preventing an overburdening of clinics. However, little is known of the effect of risk factors on the course of the infection of outpatient patients. To support general practices in managing high risk patients, we designed a COVID-19 surveillance and care tool (CovidCare). It includes an initial assessment of yet known risk factors and symptoms and a continuous telephone monitoring of signs and symptoms. This study aims to investigate the effects of different risk factors on the course of the COVID-19 disease, utilisation of different health care services and to gain insights into the utilisation of CovidCare in general practices.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Care tool; General practitioner; Management; Outpatient sector; Pandemic; Surveillance tool; Symptom diary
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34474667 PMCID: PMC8412868 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01515-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Fam Pract ISSN: 1471-2296 Impact factor: 2.497
Concept of the process evaluation
| Outcomes | Indicators (examples) | Methods/Instruments |
|---|---|---|
1) Reach The extent to which patients are reached by the implementation of CovidCare as well as the number of patients who are willing or refused to participate in CovidCare. | • How have patients been approached • Number of patients approached • Number of patients willing to participate in CovidCare • Patients: Reasons for refusal and drop-out, exclusion rate • Number of contacts per patient (i.e. telephone monitoring, particularly in the critical phase as defined by the RKI as a proxy whether GPs treat their patients according to guidelines) • Characteristics of participating patients | S, I, DB |
2) Efficacy The efficacy of the CovidCare-module includes positive and negative impacts/effects for patients and HCP as well as the patients’ quality of life and the patients and the HCP’s satisfaction with the intervention. | • Positive and negative effects on patients’ quality of life, perception of (quality of) care, disease coping • Effects on health care personnel in managing Covid-19 patients • Satisfaction of HCP and patients with CovidCare • Comparison with patients with Covid-19/suspected cases but WITHOUT additional risk factors or aged >50 | S, I, DB |
3) Adoption Adoption refers to the number of HCP and practices who agree to use the CovidCare-module and aims to understand the reasons for (not) participating in the intervention. | • Reasons for (not) participating in CovidCare; comparing characteristics of participants and non-participants (HCP, practices and patients) • Characteristics of participating HCP and practices • Barriers and facilitators | I, S, DB |
4) Implementation Implementation refers to the extent to which CovidCare is used delivered as intended. | • Problems, time, and cost of the intervention • Adaptions that were necessary to implement/use CovidCare in daily practice | I, S, DB |
5) Maintenance The extent to which the CovidCare-module became part of the daily practice routines of the individual HCP and the GP’s practice. | • Factors that facilitate the uptake of the intervention/ implementation into routine care • Suggestions for improving the intervention in order to enable CovidCare to become part of organizational practice | I |
DB database, HCP health care personnel, I interviews, S survey