Literature DB >> 34473749

Should we keep some distance from distancing? Regulatory and post-regulatory effects of emotion downregulation.

Kersten Diers1, Denise Dörfel1, Anne Gärtner1, Sabine Schönfeld1, Henrik Walter2, Alexander Strobel1, Burkhard Brocke1.   

Abstract

Emotion regulation is an indispensable part of mental health and adaptive behavior. Research into emotion regulation processes has largely focused on the concurrent effects of volitional emotion regulation. However, there is scarce evidence considering post-regulatory effects with regard to neural mechanisms and emotional experiences. Therefore, we compared concurrent effects of cognitive emotion regulation with effects at different (immediate, short- and long-term) time intervals. In an fMRI study with N = 46 (N = 30 at re-exposure) young healthy adults, we compared neuronal responses to negative and neutral pictures while participants had to distance themselves from or to actively permit emotions in response to these pictures. We investigated the temporal dynamics of activation changes related to regulation in cognitive control brain networks as well as in the amygdala during stimulation (concurrent effects, timepoint 1) and post-stimulation (immediate, timepoint 2), as well as during re-exposure with the same pictures after short (10 minutes, timepoint 3) and long (1 week, timepoint 4) time intervals. At timepoint 1, negative pictures (versus neutral pictures) elicited a strong response in regions of affective processing, including the amygdala. Distancing (as compared to permit) led to a decrease of this response, and to an increase of activation in the right middle frontal and inferior parietal cortex. We observed an interaction effect of time (stimulation vs. post-stimulation) and regulation (distance vs. permit), indicating a partial reversal of regulation effects during the post-stimulation phase (timepoint 2). Similarly, after 10 minutes (timepoint 3) and after 1 week (timepoint 4), activation in the amygdala was higher during pictures that participants were previously instructed to distance from as compared to permit. These results show that the temporal dynamics are highly variable both within experimental trials and across brain regions. This can even take the form of paradoxical aftereffects at immediate and persistent effects at prolonged time scales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34473749      PMCID: PMC8412372          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  51 in total

1.  Anxiety reduction through detachment: subjective, physiological, and neural effects.

Authors:  Raffael Kalisch; Katja Wiech; Hugo D Critchley; Ben Seymour; John P O'Doherty; David A Oakley; Philip Allen; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Impact of FAAH genetic variation on fronto-amygdala function during emotional processing.

Authors:  Anne Gärtner; Denise Dörfel; Kersten Diers; Stephanie H Witt; Alexander Strobel; Burkhard Brocke
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Amygdala response and functional connectivity during cognitive emotion regulation of aversive image sequences.

Authors:  Pegah Sarkheil; Martin Klasen; Frank Schneider; Rainer Goebel; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  Common and differential neural networks of emotion regulation by Detachment, Reinterpretation, Distraction, and Expressive Suppression: a comparative fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Denise Dörfel; Jan-Peter Lamke; Falk Hummel; Ullrich Wagner; Susanne Erk; Henrik Walter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology.

Authors:  J J Gross
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-01

6.  Principal component analysis and neural predictors of emotion regulation.

Authors:  Heide Klumpp; Runa Bhaumik; Kerry L Kinney; Jacklynn M Fitzgerald
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Acute and sustained effects of cognitive emotion regulation in major depression.

Authors:  Susanne Erk; Alexandra Mikschl; Sabine Stier; Angela Ciaramidaro; Volker Gapp; Bernhard Weber; Henrik Walter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A direct amygdala-motor pathway for emotional displays to influence action: A diffusion tensor imaging study.

Authors:  Julie Grèzes; Romain Valabrègue; Bahar Gholipour; Coralie Chevallier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Distinct contributions of the dorsolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex during emotion regulation.

Authors:  Armita Golkar; Tina B Lonsdorf; Andreas Olsson; Kara M Lindstrom; Jonathan Berrebi; Peter Fransson; Martin Schalling; Martin Ingvar; Arne Öhman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effective amygdala-prefrontal connectivity predicts individual differences in successful emotion regulation.

Authors:  Carmen Morawetz; Stefan Bode; Juergen Baudewig; Hauke R Heekeren
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.