Literature DB >> 29061386

Principal component analysis and neural predictors of emotion regulation.

Heide Klumpp1, Runa Bhaumik2, Kerry L Kinney3, Jacklynn M Fitzgerald4.   

Abstract

Reappraisal, a cognitive approach intended to alter an emotional response, is generally associated with prefrontal cortical recruitment and decreased limbic activity. However, the extent to which neurofunctional activity predicts successful reappraisal is unclear. During fMRI, 60 healthy participants completed a reappraisal paradigm, which included reappraising negative images to reduce emotional reactivity ('ReappNeg') and viewing negative images and experiencing the negative affect they evoke ('LookNeg'). After each trial, participants rated their emotional response on a Likert-type scale where higher values indicated more negative affect. Reappraisal ability was based on a difference value (ΔReappNeg-LookNeg) such that negative values signified successful reappraisal ('SR'; n=38) and positive values, unsuccessful reappraisal ('USR'; n=22). Neural activity based on ReappNeg-LookNeg conditions from 37 regions of interest encompassing cortical and limbic areas was submitted to Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Resulting PCA factors were submitted to discriminant function analysis to evaluate which factor(s) predicted SR and USR groups. Results showed a factor with high loadings for certain frontal areas (e.g., left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex) and limbic regions (e.g., bilateral amygdala) predicted 71.1% of cases in the SR group and 68.2% of cases in the USR group. Additionally, successful reappraisal corresponded with more activation in the factor with high loadings for frontal areas and less activity in the factor associated with limbic regions. Results are consistent with studies of individual differences where more prefrontal engagement and less limbic activity is associated with effectual reappraisal, but for the first time, a neural 'signature' for successful reappraisal has been demonstrated.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Cognitive reappraisal; Emotion; Frontal; Limbic; Neuroimaging; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29061386      PMCID: PMC5815323          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  36 in total

1.  Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.

Authors:  James J Gross; Oliver P John
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

Review 2.  Emotion regulation and mental health: recent findings, current challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Matthias Berking; Peggilee Wupperman
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.741

3.  Confirmatory factor and measurement invariance analyses of the emotion regulation questionnaire.

Authors:  Stephen E Melka; Steven L Lancaster; Andrew R Bryant; Benjamin F Rodriguez
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2011-09-16

Review 4.  Changing views of emotion regulation and neurobiological models of the mechanism of action of psychotherapy.

Authors:  Irene Messina; Marco Sambin; Petra Beschoner; Roberto Viviani
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  The cognitive control of emotion.

Authors:  Kevin N Ochsner; James J Gross
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Prefrontal engagement by cognitive reappraisal of negative faces.

Authors:  Brady D Nelson; Daniel A Fitzgerald; Heide Klumpp; Stewart A Shankman; K Luan Phan
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Emotion Regulatory Brain Function and SSRI Treatment in PTSD: Neural Correlates and Predictors of Change.

Authors:  Annmarie MacNamara; Christine A Rabinak; Amy E Kennedy; Daniel A Fitzgerald; Israel Liberzon; Murray B Stein; K Luan Phan
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Understanding reappraisal as a multicomponent process: The psychological health benefits of attempting to use reappraisal depend on reappraisal success.

Authors:  Brett Q Ford; Helena R Karnilowicz; Iris B Mauss
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2017-03-30

9.  Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression.

Authors:  Andrew T Drysdale; Logan Grosenick; Jonathan Downar; Katharine Dunlop; Farrokh Mansouri; Yue Meng; Robert N Fetcho; Benjamin Zebley; Desmond J Oathes; Amit Etkin; Alan F Schatzberg; Keith Sudheimer; Jennifer Keller; Helen S Mayberg; Faith M Gunning; George S Alexopoulos; Michael D Fox; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Henning U Voss; B J Casey; Marc J Dubin; Conor Liston
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 10.  A systematic review of neurobiological and clinical features of mindfulness meditations.

Authors:  A Chiesa; A Serretti
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  3 in total

1.  Distinct neural engagement during implicit and explicit regulation of negative stimuli.

Authors:  Jacklynn M Fitzgerald; Kerry L Kinney; K Luan Phan; Heide Klumpp
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Should we keep some distance from distancing? Regulatory and post-regulatory effects of emotion downregulation.

Authors:  Kersten Diers; Denise Dörfel; Anne Gärtner; Sabine Schönfeld; Henrik Walter; Alexander Strobel; Burkhard Brocke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Principal component analysis and brain-based predictors of emotion regulation in anxiety and depression.

Authors:  Heide Klumpp; Kerry L Kinney; Runa Bhaumik; Jacklynn M Fitzgerald
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 10.592

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.