Yogendra Kumar Saini1, Pawan Singhal1, K P Surendra Prabhu2, Sushmitha Nagaraj1, Shivam Sharma1, Rajeev Yadav3, Bhawani Singh Aeron4, Sudeep Munjal5, Man Prakash Sharma1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Various ossicular reconstruction materials and techniques have been described in literature using autologous ossicle, cortical bone, autologous cartilage, synthetic materials and implants like total/partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP/PORP) etc., but it has always been a topic of controversy in terms of the efficacy, longevity and complications of the material or method used.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective, interventional, comparative, double-blind randomized control study which was done at a tertiary care center to compare outcomes of conventional and carved conchal cartilage (vertical strut) type III Tympanoplasty in terms of graft uptake and hearing gain. A total number of 52 cases were enrolled, randomized and allocated to 2 groups (26 each) i.e. group A (conventional type III) and group B (vertical strut technique).
RESULTS: Graft uptake was seen in 25 (96.16%) patients in group B while it was observed in 23 (88.5%) cases in group A. Hearing gains were also better in group B.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that Vertical Strut technique can be studied further as it gives better gains in Air Conduction threshold and A-B Gap along with graft uptake as it provides better middle ear space and ossicular / tympanic membrane interface resulting in better hearing. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2021.
INTRODUCTION: Various ossicular reconstruction materials and techniques have been described in literature using autologous ossicle, cortical bone, autologous cartilage, synthetic materials and implants like total/partial ossicular replacement prosthesis (TORP/PORP) etc., but it has always been a topic of controversy in terms of the efficacy, longevity and complications of the material or method used.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective, interventional, comparative, double-blind randomized control study which was done at a tertiary care center to compare outcomes of conventional and carved conchal cartilage (vertical strut) type III Tympanoplasty in terms of graft uptake and hearing gain. A total number of 52 cases were enrolled, randomized and allocated to 2 groups (26 each) i.e. group A (conventional type III) and group B (vertical strut technique).
RESULTS: Graft uptake was seen in 25 (96.16%) patients in group B while it was observed in 23 (88.5%) cases in group A. Hearing gains were also better in group B.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that Vertical Strut technique can be studied further as it gives better gains in Air Conduction threshold and A-B Gap along with graft uptake as it provides better middle ear space and ossicular / tympanic membrane interface resulting in better hearing. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2021.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hearing gain; Ossiculoplasty; Tympanoplasty; Vertical strut; Vertical strut ossiculoplasty
Year: 2021
PMID： 34471627 PMCID： PMC8364591 DOI： 10.1007/s12070-021-02614-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ISSN： 2231-3796