Literature DB >> 12150530

Dimensional stability of the free fascia grafts: an animal experiment.

Shabbir Indorewala1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: It appears that autologous free fascia grafts (fascia lata and temporal fascia) change their dimensions during the vital first 5 days of healing. Poor dimensional stability of these grafts can be an important reason for failure of complete closure of tympanic membrane perforations in tympanoplasty operations. There has been no study regarding this dimensional instability. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospectively dimensional instability of the free fascia grafts studied in 14 mongrel dogs.
METHODS: Fourteen healthy Mongrel dogs were operated on twice. During the first surgery, fascia lata and temporal fascia grafts of measured dimensions (length, breadth, and thickness) were implanted in the subcutaneous pockets on the thoraco-abdominal wall of the same dog (autograft). Five dogs were operated on again after 2 days, and 7 dogs were operated on again after 5 days to harvest the implanted grafts. The dimensions of the harvested grafts were noted. Changes with respect to their implant dimensions after 2 days and after 5 days were calculated.
RESULTS: It was found that free fascia lata exhibits significantly superior dimensional stability when compared with free temporal fascia during the early healing phase, before graft integration has occurred. Shrinking and thickening of temporal fascia are greater and are also most unpredictable.
CONCLUSIONS: Poor dimensional stability of temporal fascia may compromise a well-sealed perforation at the time of surgery, and it may reopen by the 5th day. This must be one of the causes of failure of tympanoplasty, which needs to be studied further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12150530     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200204000-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  17 in total

1.  Island cartilage tympanoplasty in revision cases: anatomic and functional results.

Authors:  Xabier Altuna; Juan José Navarro; Jesús Algaba
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia.

Authors:  Arman Tek; Murat Karaman; Celil Uslu; Tülay Habeşoğlu; Yasin Kılıçarslan; Ruhi Durmuş; Senem Esen; Erol Egeli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Cartilage "shield" tympanoplasty: an effective and practical technique.

Authors:  Emilia Iacovou; Efthymios Kyrodimos; Aristides Sismanis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Repair of subtotal tympanic membrane perforation by ultrathin cartilage shield: evaluation of take rate and hearing result.

Authors:  Khaled M Mokbel; El-Saeed M Thabet
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Indian Perspectives on Graft Materials Used for Repair of Tympanic Membrane.

Authors:  Manu Malhotra; Saurabh Varshney; Rashmi Malhotra; Poonam Joshi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-07-01

6.  The wheel-shaped composite cartilage graft (WsCCG) and temporalis fascia for type 1 tympanoplasty: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Ejder Ciğer; Mustafa Koray Balcı; Akif İşlek; Kazım Önal
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Inci Alkan Demirpehlivan; Kazim Onal; Secil Arslanoglu; Murat Songu; Ejder Ciger; Nazan Can
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforations: a comparison with the temporalis fascia technique.

Authors:  K Cagdas Kazikdas; Kazim Onal; Ismail Boyraz; Erdem Karabulut
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Is cartilage better than temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty? Implications for current surgical practice.

Authors:  Emily Iacovou; Petros V Vlastarakos; George Papacharalampous; Efthymios Kyrodimos; Thomas P Nikolopoulos
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Cartilage graft or fascia in tympanoplasty in patients with low middle ear risk index (anatomical and audological results).

Authors:  Elif Ersoy Callioglu; B Tijen Ceylan; Gokhan Kuran; Sule Demirci; Kamil Gokce Tulaci; Refik Caylan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.