| Literature DB >> 34471502 |
Hao Zhang1, Yue-Bei Luo2, Wantao Wu3, Liyang Zhang1, Zeyu Wang1, Ziyu Dai1, Songshan Feng1, Hui Cao4, Quan Cheng1,5,6, Zhixiong Liu1,6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gliomas are one of the most common types of primary tumors in central nervous system. Previous studies have found that macrophages actively participate in tumor growth.Entities:
Keywords: ACC, Adrenocortical carcinoma; BBB, brain blood barrier; BLCA, Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma; BRCA, Breast invasive carcinoma; CDF, cumulative distribution function; CESC, Cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma; CGGA, Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas; CHOL, Cholangiocarcinoma; CNA, copy number alternations; CNV, copy number variation; COAD, Colon adenocarcinoma; CSF-1, colony-stimulating factor-1; DLBC, Lymphoid Neoplasm Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma; DMP, differentially methylated position; ESCA, Esophageal carcinoma; GBM, glioblastoma; GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus; GO, gene ontology; GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis; GSVA, gene set variation analysis; Glioma microenvironment; HNSC, Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma; IGR, intergenic region; IHC, immunohistochemistry; IL, interleukin; Immunotherapy; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes; KICH, Kidney Chromophobe; KIRC, Kidney renal clear cell carcinoma; KIRP, Kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma; LGG, low grade glioma; LIHC, Liver hepatocellular carcinoma; LUAD, Lung adenocarcinoma; LUSC, Lung squamous cell carcinoma; MMP-2, matrix metalloproteinase-2; MT1, MMP membrane type 1 matrix metalloprotease; Machine learning; Macrophage; OV, Ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma; PAAD, Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; PAM, partition around medoids; PCA, principal component analysis; PCPG, Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma; PRAD, Prostate adenocarcinoma; Prognostic model; READ, Rectum adenocarcinoma; SARC, Sarcoma; SKCM, Skin Cutaneous Melanoma; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; SNV, single-nucleotide variant; STAD, Stomach adenocarcinoma; SVM, Support Vector Machines; TAM, tumor associated macrophage; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; TGF-β, tumor growth factor-β; THCA, Thyroid carcinoma; THYM, Thymoma; TIMP-2, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2; TLR2, toll-like receptor 2; TME, tumor microenvironment; TNFα, tumor necrosis factor α; TSS, transcription start site; UCEC, Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma; UCS, Uterine Carcinosarcoma; WGCNA, weighted gene co-expression network analysis; pamr, prediction analysis for microarrays
Year: 2021 PMID: 34471502 PMCID: PMC8383063 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Struct Biotechnol J ISSN: 2001-0370 Impact factor: 7.271
Fig. 1Construction and validation of M2 macrophage-related clusters based on machine learning. A, clustering dendrogram demonstrating good separation of the two clusters determined via PAM algorithm by traits. B, sample clustering by PCA in the TCGA dataset. C, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the two clusters. D, validation of clustering by pamr. E, selection of optimal threshold and exhibition of misclassification error. F, heatmap illustrating the differentiation power of 13 genes, red dots and green dots representing samples classified by genes. G, validation of clustering by neural network. H, validation of clustering by SVM. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 2Characterization of the two clusters. A, dendrogram correlating the levels of 64 cell types and clusters in TCGA. B, ESTIMATEScores, ImuneScores and StromalScores of the two clusters in TCGA. C, molecule levels in the pathways involved in immune checkpoint pathways in TCGA.
Fig. 3Genomic features of the two clusters. A, global CNV profile of the two cluster. B, distribution of gain or loss of function mutation in the two clusters. C, list of the most frequently altered genes in clusters 1 and 2.
Fig. 4Methylation characteristics of the two clusters. A, clustering dendrogram by DMPs showing good separation of the two clusters by clinical and genetic traits. B, volcano plot of DMPs and their position in genes. C, Manhattan plot of the genome-wide DNA differential methylation. D, GSEA of the two clusters. E, GO functional enrichment analysis. F, comparison of enrichment scores of several immune cell types in the two clusters. *** p < 0.001.
Fig. 5Characterization of the MScore. A, dendrogram correlating the MScores and 64 cell types. B, GO functional enrichment analysis correlating different immune regulatory processes with MScores. C, survival analyses of MScores in pan-glioma, LGG and GBM groups from TCGA. D, Hazard ratios of MScores in different cancer types based on univariate Cox regression analysis. GBM, Glioblastoma multiforme; LGG, Brain Lower Grade Glioma; CHOL, Cholangiocarcinoma; OV, Ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma; LIHC, Liver hepatocellular carcinoma; ESCA, Esophageal carcinoma; PAAD, Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; STAD, Stomach adenocarcinoma; COAD, Colon adenocarcinoma; KIRC, Kidney renal clear cell carcinoma; READ, Rectum adenocarcinoma; PCPG, Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma; HNSC, Head and Neck squamous cell carcinoma; CESC, Cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma; LUSC, Lung squamous cell carcinoma; KIRP, Kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma; KICH, Kidney Chromophobe; BRCA, Breast invasive carcinoma; THCA, Thyroid carcinoma; DLBC, Lymphoid Neoplasm Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma; SKCM, Skin Cutaneous Melanoma; BLCA, Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma; SARC, Sarcoma; THYM, Thymoma; LUAD, Lung adenocarcinoma; UCEC, Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma; UCS, Uterine Carcinosarcoma; ACC, Adrenocortical carcinoma; PRAD, Prostate adenocarcinoma. E, GO enrich functional analysis of MScores in several cancer types. F, MScore discriminating survival probabilities in Xiangya glioma cohort. G, CD163 staining for 25 LGG samples and 15 GBM samples. IHC against CD163 molecule demonstrating the different M2 macrophage densities in the two MScore groups.
Fig. 6MScores discriminating survival probabilities in the majority of glioma cohorts.
Fig. 7Predictive value of MScore in immunotherapy response. A, Kaplan-Meier curve of high and low MScore groups in IMvigor210 cohort. B, rain-cloud plot showing MScores of CR, PR, PD and SD groups. CR, complete response; PR, partial response; PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease. C, the bar chart showing proportions of high and low MScores. D, the bar chart showing proportions of CR/PR and SD/PD patients in high and low MScore groups. E, Constitution of the four therapeutic response types in high and low MScore groups. F. comparison of collective CD274 levels in the two MScore groups. G, Survival analysis of MScores in a melanoma cohort. H, Proportions of high and low MScores in different response groups. I, proportions of different response groups in high and low MScore groups. J, physiologic functions of M2 macrophages. CR, complete response; NS, not significant; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial; SD, stable disease. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001.