OBJECTIVE: We aimed to present a novel semiautomated tool for orbital fracture size measurement and to compare the variability of the proposed method with traditional manual measurements. METHODS: Maximal anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimensions of orbital fractures from computed tomography images were measured for 15 patients with unilateral orbital fractures by 2 surgeons manually and with a semiautomatic software. Variability was assessed with Bland-Altman limits of agreement plots and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The intra-observer ICCs in manual and automatic measurements were high, >0.9. The inter-observer ICCs in manual measurements were 0.926 (AP) and 0.631 (ML) and in automatic measurements 0.989 (AP) and 0.989 (ML). The ICCs for manual and semiautomated variability were 0.899 (AP) and 0.669 (ML). The differences were thus particularly pronounced in the ML dimensions. In addition, with the semiautomated technique, a total fracture area could be measured and compared with the total area of the bony orbit and a 3-dimensional reformatted image could be generated. CONCLUSIONS: Intra- and inter-observer variability proved to be very low for measuring fracture maximal AP length and ML width, making both the manual and the semiautomatic methods feasible clinically. The semiautomatic fracture size analysis allows better observer-independent repeatability for fracture size measurements and provides the possibility for total fracture area measurements at any orbital bony site, even in challenging nonplanar topography.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to present a novel semiautomated tool for orbital fracture size measurement and to compare the variability of the proposed method with traditional manual measurements. METHODS: Maximal anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimensions of orbital fractures from computed tomography images were measured for 15 patients with unilateral orbital fractures by 2 surgeons manually and with a semiautomatic software. Variability was assessed with Bland-Altman limits of agreement plots and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: The intra-observer ICCs in manual and automatic measurements were high, >0.9. The inter-observer ICCs in manual measurements were 0.926 (AP) and 0.631 (ML) and in automatic measurements 0.989 (AP) and 0.989 (ML). The ICCs for manual and semiautomated variability were 0.899 (AP) and 0.669 (ML). The differences were thus particularly pronounced in the ML dimensions. In addition, with the semiautomated technique, a total fracture area could be measured and compared with the total area of the bony orbit and a 3-dimensional reformatted image could be generated. CONCLUSIONS: Intra- and inter-observer variability proved to be very low for measuring fracture maximal AP length and ML width, making both the manual and the semiautomatic methods feasible clinically. The semiautomatic fracture size analysis allows better observer-independent repeatability for fracture size measurements and provides the possibility for total fracture area measurements at any orbital bony site, even in challenging nonplanar topography.
Authors: Thomas Schouman; Delphine S Courvoisier; Benoit Imholz; Christopher Van Issum; Paolo Scolozzi Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 3.528