| Literature DB >> 34469542 |
Hui Yang1, Songlin Yang1,2, Fei Fan1,2, Yun Li1,2, Shaoxing Dai1, Xin Zhou1, Cynthia C Steiner3, Bretton Coppedge3, Christian Roos4, Xianghai Cai5, David M Irwin6, Peng Shi1,7.
Abstract
Bitter taste receptors serve as a vital component in the defense system against toxin intake by animals, and the family of genes encoding these receptors has been demonstrated, usually by family size variance, to correlate with dietary preference. However, few systematic studies of specific Tas2R to unveil their functional evolution have been conducted. Here, we surveyed Tas2R16 across all major clades of primates and reported a rare case of a convergent change to increase sensitivity to β-glucopyranosides in human and a New World monkey, the white-faced saki. Combining analyses at multiple levels, we demonstrate that a parallel amino acid substitution (K172N) shared by these two species is responsible for this functional convergence of Tas2R16. Considering the specialized feeding preference of the white-faced saki, the K172N change likely played an important adaptive role in its early evolution to avoid potentially toxic cyanogenic glycosides, as suggested for the human TAS2R16 gene.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Pithecia pitheciazzm321990 ; Tas2R16; adaptive evolution; bitter taste receptors; convergent evolution; human; white-faced saki
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34469542 PMCID: PMC8662605 DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msab263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Evol ISSN: 0737-4038 Impact factor: 16.240
Fig. 1Amino acid states at site 172 of Tas2R16 in primate species involved in this study and their in vitro function in representative species. (A) Phylogeny of the 41 primate species involved in this study. Amino acid states at site 172 of Tas2R16 in each species are mapped along the phylogenetic tree. The two branches that experienced parallel evolution are underlined. Asterisk indicates the sequence contains premature stop codons. (B) Half maximal effective concentrations (EC50) for salicin and helicin in representative primate Tas2R16s. States for the amino acid at site 172 and the EC50 for salicin and helicin for each Tas2R16 assayed are mapped along with the accepted phylogeny. Residues on interior nodes indicate inferred ancestral states. The two branches that experienced parallel evolution are underlined. #, Data are from Imai and Itoigawa ; ND, not determined; -, nonresponsive.
Likelihood Ratio Tests for Positive Selection in Primate Tas2R16s.
| Models | ln | ω(d | Models’ Comparison |
| Positively Selected Sites (BEB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1a (NearlyNeutral) | −6,553.715264 | 0.7523 | |||
| M2a (PositiveSelection) | −6,533.193751 | 1.0219 | M1a versus M2a | 1.22E−09 | 179Q 182T 198F 255R |
| M7 (beta) | −6,555.454121 | 0.7404 | |||
| M8 (beta&ω) | −6,533.011973 | 0.9962 | M7 versus M8 | 1.79E−10 | 82T 174H 179Q 180A 182T 198F 255R |
BEB= Bayes Empirical Bayes analysis. Amino acids with posterior probability >0.95 are listed.
Fig. 2Concentration−response curves and EC50 comparisons of wild-type and N172K mutated white-faced saki Tas2R16 for salicin (A) and helicin (B). Response curves of wild-type and N172K mutated Tas2R16 are represented by solid and dotted lines, respectively. **, Differences are significant at the 1% level (P < 0.01).
Fig. 3Binding mode and energy change for salicin to the white-faced saki Tas2R16. (A) Overview of the binding mode for salicin to saki Tas2R16. Secondary structural elements are colored from blue (N-terminus) to red (C-terminus). Potential binding sites are highlighted. Transmembrane domains are labeled as TM1−TM7. (B) Corresponding interaction diagram for the Tas2R16−salicin complex. Residues with green labels are involved in hydrogen bonds. Red radial lines denote hydrophobic interactions, and green lines represent hydrogen bonds. All distances are in Å. (C) Close-up view of the binding sites and mutated region of saki Tas2R16. Wild-type and mutant structures are colored in green and red, respectively. Salicin is colored in orange. The side chains of the residues in the mutant region are shown as sticks. Yellow lines and the numbers represent the minimum distances between salicin and the residues. All distances are in Å. (D) Boxplot showing the binding energy change between the wildtype (WT) and N172K mutant (MUT).